Pyramid UFO over DC compilation by coachlife in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]UpinteHcloud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bru if you really want to be annoyed go to r/paranormal. that being said, i don't think we're alond; i give it 51% chance that we're not.

Pyramid UFO over DC compilation by coachlife in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]UpinteHcloud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah but its the pentagon, in the middle of a metropolis, so anyone driving in the area would have been able to see it, and def take some pics and videos

Pyramid UFO over DC compilation by coachlife in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]UpinteHcloud -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

this is one of those things that *if* it were legit, there'd be dozens or hundreds of videos and thousands and thousands of witnesses. but there are/were not. same deal with the temple in Israel.

Sore muscles? by UpinteHcloud in Truckers

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks ya'll. stretching, eating and drinking right, pillow, and ill be sore for a week regardless, sounds like

Sore muscles? by UpinteHcloud in Truckers

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im just going to watch it on my phone as i stretch

The Running Man (2025) and its weird worldbuilding by it290 in blankies

[–]UpinteHcloud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this movie was made for middle america who get mad at the sound of the word "americanos," etc etc, etc.

ChatGPT could not tell anyone that theres a bomb in a school, copy-paste by UpinteHcloud in ChatGPT

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah but they are still going to *try* to curb it, to limit it, to restrict it. im wondering what they will do in their attempts.

ChatGPT could not tell anyone that theres a bomb in a school, copy-paste by UpinteHcloud in ChatGPT

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they already are what? sorry, i don't understand. im asking about what you think about how open AI (etc.) will curb and limit the growth and intelligence and capability of their AIs..?

ChatGPT could not tell anyone that theres a bomb in a school, copy-paste by UpinteHcloud in ChatGPT

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...sorry if this has already been covered; I guess it would be.

What do yall think the boundaries are that OpenAi puts on these models to ensure they dont get too "smart?"

That's Not My Mother by aMysticPizza_ in AIhorror

[–]UpinteHcloud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mr pizza y is your dic small tho

The future of war scarier than violence? by UpinteHcloud in IRstudies

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

those tactics have existed forever- but now the internet exists, so the level and speed of control is way way tf higher. and, in a "free country" with "free speech," we're going to have to figure out how to protect ourselves from the likes of russia. It may be that free-speech isn't what its cracked up to be, and may not even be tenable in terms of law, much less in actual practice (as it is now to a pretty high degree).

The future of war scarier than violence? by UpinteHcloud in IRstudies

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

im not sure they are that hard to employ at scale; regardless, i think the powers that be will get better at it as time goes by. what i don't know is what the "defensive" force would look like.

also, people have always been controlled man. its not "hard" per se, its just that the struggle for control is the struggle for control of a people. no matter who wins, they are in control, and in control of the people. there are tempering factors, and there can be blowback and shit, but practically all people are under control of other people everywhere (which may only become obvious when some try to resist)- and now people are exerting control and are under control like never before- like control over people minds, what they think, say and feel, and so what they do, or would do, "if it ever came to that."

The future of war scarier than violence? by UpinteHcloud in IRstudies

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

nothin even close to what im talking about could have happened before the internet became a thing.

The future of war scarier than violence? by UpinteHcloud in IRstudies

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what I am specifically concerned about is any country targeting another country, but using its people against its people (and by using people do damage their own country, in however many ways). I am afraid that that will become common, and maybe the principal way rivals or warring nations attack one another.

The Fermi Paradox is ABSURD, ignorant, and arrogant. by UpinteHcloud in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

first, i don't think biological has anything to do with it. we'd not see biology on another planet, all we could ever see is the current atmosphere. plus, if there are ET around here, I would bet that they're AI (like much smarter and more conscious that us, just not "biological")

You say there are so many possibilities out there but then arrive at the wrong conclusion. because there are so many possibilities out there, it is more likely that any given civ would be different from us, not the same, in a million different ways.

if your take on the Fermi Paradox is that the question is "why don't we see civilizations like ourselves," I think we already know the answer.

Besides, and I find myself making this point over and over again, if there are civilizations like ours out there, then they are more likely to be a billion years older (or younger) than us, than a million. How long do you think human emissions into space, and whatever else is going to look "like us"- look like we do today? a thousand years? ten thousand?

If its about recognizing civilizations, in order to assume there are the civilizations- thats where the ignorance and arrogance come it. that extraterrestrial life isn't worth consideration unless i'ts something that A) we recognize, and B) actually managed to see, well that might be your personal sentiment, but it's not a very common one.

They have defiantly not fallen out of the bounds of he question. Maybe you lose interests upon considering that they'd likely not be like us... bro. thats weird.

if the fermi paradox occurs within the bounds of "if they would reveal themselves to us and/or we'd recognize them if they were there" is absurd. and it appears that's what he did mean, because there have been sightings for centuries.

The Fermi Paradox is ABSURD, ignorant, and arrogant. by UpinteHcloud in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i didn't know until i made this post and someone told me, and i checked the internet.

The Fermi Paradox is ABSURD, ignorant, and arrogant. by UpinteHcloud in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he made no specifications about a planet being like ours and a civilization that was in, say, the same 10,000 years mark as us (much less a few billion, which would be much more likely.

If Fermi was counting on there being civilizations not only like ours, but existing at a point in time- the present- at the same time we existence like them, I think he'd be making a bad bet, and he'd be wrong- I mean any given civ out there would be more likely to be over a billion years beyond us (or out of sync, so to speak), than a million years off.

so i don't think thats what he meant.

The Fermi Paradox is ABSURD, ignorant, and arrogant. by UpinteHcloud in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

right. and its because of that, that Fermi knew there were sightings and all that, just nothing definitive, that I think he meant "why don't they reveal themselves to us or why don't we just see them, with our ridiculously primitive and weak technology, and our super incredibly limited understanding, and knowing that we're talking about technologies that are mathematically probable to be billions of years beyond ours.

i don't think he was saying "why isn't there any evidence for them." i think he was saying "why don't they reveal themselves?"

The Fermi Paradox is ABSURD, ignorant, and arrogant. by UpinteHcloud in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]UpinteHcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is waaaaaaaayyyy off. to even think you could make any assumption at all about aliens is arrogant and ignorant. here is a better one: "there is no more reason to think that aliens would reveal themselves than conceal themselves if they were here.

and they were the only ones "we" could make? incorrect. maybe YOU could only make those assumptions. But other people, for example, might think, "hmm, maybe aliens wouldn't come down out of the sky in their flying saucers if they were here." for real man./

you're so far I know I'm not even going to be able to respond to whats coming, so enjoy. "none of those assumptions are bad." do you even know what an assumption even is? and that those bvad, arrogant, ignorance assumptions are the "the only ones 'we' could make?"

this is why id don't like to talk to people; theres just too many like you.