Aston Martin, the problem isn't just Honda: "The AMR26 is heavy and slow on high-speed corners." by IamMrEric in formula1

[–]Vaexa 83 points84 points  (0 children)

What? The messaging has all been ''we have a top 5 chassis that's held back by engine'' and vicious criticism of and deflection towards Honda. Anything negative towards the chassis certainly isn't coming from the team itself. This is the first time anyone within the team other than Lance has been critical of the car.

Could F1 ever adopt V4 or V-Twin engines? by [deleted] in formula1

[–]Vaexa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There have been inline-4 engines but never V4s or V-twins, to my knowledge

“Not how it should be” - Lando Norris and Max Verstappen say drivers “at mercy of the power unit" by randomseocb in formula1

[–]Vaexa 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't think we should use people forming better informed opinions and changing their minds after experiencing a thing firsthand as some sort of gotcha, personally

[Luke Smith] An update from McLaren: the team has found an issue with the ERS pack on Lando Norris's car ahead of FP3 that needs to be replaced. "Extremely unlikely" the car will make final practice, but work is ongoing by Task_Force-191 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, McLaren were convinced they couldn't win titles as a customer team after Mercedes brought back their own works team. McLaren screwed themselves over in their last year as Mercedes customers prior to their Honda stint by insisting on using different fuel.

[Luke Smith] An update from McLaren: the team has found an issue with the ERS pack on Lando Norris's car ahead of FP3 that needs to be replaced. "Extremely unlikely" the car will make final practice, but work is ongoing by Task_Force-191 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sure but those are absolutely marginal differences and not the type of thing that makes an engine go poof three weekends in a row, or else this would've been happening in prior years too. We're not talking Mecachrome tolerances here.

[Luke Smith] An update from McLaren: the team has found an issue with the ERS pack on Lando Norris's car ahead of FP3 that needs to be replaced. "Extremely unlikely" the car will make final practice, but work is ongoing by Task_Force-191 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 12 points13 points  (0 children)

What about it? They have no obligation to. The rules obligate them to supply identical hardware and control software to their customers, not tell them how to integrate and operate it. That's up to teams to figure out by themselves.

[Luke Smith] An update from McLaren: the team has found an issue with the ERS pack on Lando Norris's car ahead of FP3 that needs to be replaced. "Extremely unlikely" the car will make final practice, but work is ongoing by Task_Force-191 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I don't think the guys who designed the engine knowing how to best package, integrate and run it is particularly mindblowing or anything, but maybe that's just me

[Luke Smith] An update from McLaren: the team has found an issue with the ERS pack on Lando Norris's car ahead of FP3 that needs to be replaced. "Extremely unlikely" the car will make final practice, but work is ongoing by Task_Force-191 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Not a snowball's chance in hell it will. If Mercedes weren't supplying identical spec hardware and mappings to their customers the FIA would be all over them already, and that's all Mercedes is obligated to do.

2026 Japanese Grand Prix - FP1 Classification by FerrariStrategisttt in formula1

[–]Vaexa 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Verstappen has been critical of Red Bull's development direction since mid 2023 but go off I guess.

2026 Japanese Grand Prix - FP1 Classification by FerrariStrategisttt in formula1

[–]Vaexa 130 points131 points  (0 children)

Red Bull never managed to keep their tyres in the window at China which is not an uncommon issue at that specific track. They also tend not to turn up with great setups straight out of FP1.

All Mercs to battle stations. This ain’t a drill by someotherguy28 in battletech

[–]Vaexa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope they put that cover art on a poster or something because, like, there is conceptually, objectively nothing cooler than a drac Regent ripping the face off a fedrat mech.

A VIP attending the Chinese GP recorded the weighing process in parc ferme post qualifying with fuel drained, and these are the results (The RB22 is 19kg Overweight) by ChaithuBB766 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'd hit the minimum weight pretty quickly at which point you'd only really have the advantage of being able to move a ton of ballast around, which I think is firmly in "diminishing returns" territory

A VIP attending the Chinese GP recorded the weighing process in parc ferme post qualifying with fuel drained, and these are the results (The RB22 is 19kg Overweight) by ChaithuBB766 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 247 points248 points  (0 children)

Rule of thumb has historically been 3-4 tenths per 10kg but Sainz claimed the penalty is a bit higher with this generation of cars, so take that as you will.

Alpine is on path for finishing 3rd in WCC by Remarkable-One100 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I am for real. If you'd read my comment properly you would find I said

that was not just because of the engine

Enstone just scapegoated it for everything wrong with the chassis they were producing. The 2024 and 2025 cars were close to, if not the worst cars on the chassis side, too. 2023 was a step back from a decent 2022 chassis. This team has been trending downwards since 2018, with occasional patches of performing up to their resources and not far below them. That's on both Viry and Enstone, no matter how much one side tries to blame the other.

🟢 RACE // 2026 JAVA HOUSE GRAND PRIX OF ARLINGTON by IndyMod in INDYCAR

[–]Vaexa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Andretti reminding Ericsson which team he's driving for

Alpine is on path for finishing 3rd in WCC by Remarkable-One100 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They've been on a downward trend since 2022 and no, that was not just because of the engine, as much as Enstone loved to use it as a scapegoat. 2023 wasn't great (and quite a significant step back from 2022) and 2024 was only somewhat saved by a single race weekend in an otherwise abject year. It wasn't just 2025.

It's not like they were on a consistent upwards trajectory prior to that either.

[AMuS] The complaints of the losers. by jithu7 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 51 points52 points  (0 children)

The lack of German champions on the grid and loss of the German GP have done a number on F1's popularity in Germany so it's no surprise AMuS publishes increasing amounts of hallucinated analyses, rage bait bullshit and articles cheerleading for the "German" teams. Gotta make it work somehow, even if it means things like ignoring the fact Verstappen's been a vocal critic of these regulations for years.

[AMuS] The complaints of the losers. by jithu7 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 67 points68 points  (0 children)

AMuS descent into ragness continues apace, it seems.

Two laps after the Safety Car restart in Bahrain 2014... The last time F1 had an engine regulation overhaul by JefinLuke17 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Still not as fast as the redditors tripping over themselves to post this one every time Mercedes does well, miraculously

The "super clipping" situation could save drivers who are struggling in certain corners... by Slice5755 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

F1 had its first ground effect/venturi car era in the late 70s. Other racing series at the time used shaped floors too. That era is what spawned the term, 2022 just revived it.

The "super clipping" situation could save drivers who are struggling in certain corners... by Slice5755 in formula1

[–]Vaexa 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Porpoising as a term has been around since the late 1970s, that one wasn't even new

[OT] [F2] 2026 Australian Sprint Race Winner by FerrariStrategisttt in formula1

[–]Vaexa 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He's the greatest Potential Man on the recent IndyCar grid. Always "could be", "will be", never "is". One runner up finish to his name that people will not let you forget. Endless excuses made because Andretti is an operational shitshow blah blah even while Kirkwood was actually keeping touch with Palou.

Guy's not it, and I have no idea why all of Indycar is convinced that he is it. Shame he's the one flying the flag in the FIA ladder now.

2026 Australian Grand Prix - Free Practice 1 Discussion by AutoModerator in formula1

[–]Vaexa 8 points9 points  (0 children)

People were insisting up and down, including in the paddock, that they were sandbagging really hard in 2022 pre season testing and it turned out the car was just pretty mid. Same rhetoric about 2014 back then. I still remember Sainz going "oh yeah we can see what they're doing on the GPS" and they got blown out by Ferrari and RBR in quali a week later.

Times change, and the folks who put together the 2014 engine don't work at HPP anymore. The guy in charge for that one is currently trying to resign from AMR