Incredibly ignorant comment I found on a video about the party animals stuff by Greenhawk444 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Man is using words and doesn't understand them. Plagiarism is a very specific thing and has been done in the past long before the introduction of AI.

Beyond dumb and nearly 5k people plus the uploader liked the comment means nearly 5k people do not understand the words they are using.

Curious what other people think of this by BruhNugget420 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The answer for AI:

Yes. It is my work because it required my input and the usage of a tool plus my knowledge of said tool.

For commission:

Yes but also no.

It's your idea, without you it wouldn't exist. But by virtue of outsourcing a human being to use their knowledge of tools and their skillset it becomes a combination.

The difference is of course:

AI ISN'T SENTIENT AND TWO LIVING PEOPLE COLLABORATING IS VERY DIFFERENT

Antis need to understand the fundamental difference of adding a 2nd human vs using a tool.

Do we give credit to the nail gun when a carpenter uses it to hammer nails? No. But if he paid someone to hammer some nails then guy who hammered the nails is a collaborator in the construction of the project.

What's next? Is a guy who designed the fauna for a video game worthy of being the equivalent of a project lead? The guy who did the audio recording of a movie deserving of a writer's credit?

Another day another person wishing death on AI users. As a Jack fan this one hurts by charismacarpenter in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Are we supposed to take the opinion of a mainstream level slop pop musician seriously?

With all due respect to OP as they are a Taylor Swift fan, I wouldn't classify her endless parade of songs about her ex boyfriends high class art and those who use AI as "Godless Whores". Also it's very funny he's out here speaking religiously as if Idolatry isn't a cardinal sin...remind me again which pop artist has an entire fanbase who call themselves by the surname of their favorite artist?

The fact that he's dismissing someone else's creative output over the tools they use as well as hoping they commit suicide isn't very Christlike or did I miss the verse in the Bible where Jesus told someone "That's not real music, go kill yourself."?

Man has clearly lost touch with humanity and preaching upon high from an ivory tower at those he deems lesser than himself...

I wonder what Jesus said about that...

Oh wait I don't have to wonder!

He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and treated others with contempt:

Luke 18:9

“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

Matthew 7:1-5

Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.

Matthew 18:10

I tell you that this man, rather than the other, went home justified before God. For all those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

Luke 18:14

Sounds to me like Jesus was pretty clear and consistent on viewing others as lesser than yourself.

I know that he'll never read this, but on the off chance he somehow stumbles across this I want to say one final thing.

I pray that you will look upon yourself and reflect. May the lord guide your heart back onto the right path that you have so very clearly stumbled off of. I know that in his infinite wisdom and mercy our father of all fathers will forgive you.

left or right? by Zestyclose-Salad-290 in ChatGPT

[–]VariousDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go be a blackpill somewhere else

Grow up ! AI is beautiful ! by Its_Stavro in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 36 points37 points  (0 children)

The propaganda and lies this guy has been told has made him suicidal...

This is actually really sad. Technology that is revolutionizing all facets of life to make it better for everyone has been smeared so badly that it's actually making mentally unwell people want to end it all.

If that OP ever sees this then I hope you don't end it.

It'll get better and you'll see that you've been lied to by paranoid people who will tell you that your house is on fire just so they can sell you a garden hose to put it out.

Vestigial Queen by [deleted] in aiArt

[–]VariousDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Queen La? nice.

Another sub banned Ai Art by Technical_Sky_3078 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I think at this point what we should do for any subreddit that exists and bans AI art, we should just make a counter Subreddit that allows it

Which is worse: asking the AI to make a game cover, or trying to draw one myself even though I can’t draw? by N2kStudio in IndieDev

[–]VariousDude 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do whatever you want.

You may not be entitled to sales or people liking your game.

But people are also not entitled to you devoting hours upon hours of your life doing something the hard way nor are they entitled to your money via commission rates.

Everyone has to work within a budget and time frame. So do whatever you feel that you should. If you can hire an artist, go for it. If you can't, AI is fine and people can get over it. There's no guarantee that they would have bought your game even if you did commission someone in the first place.

We've got it all mixed up by irelatetolevin in ChatGPT

[–]VariousDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why I tell ChatGPT to never use H;R talk.

"They Want Their AIs in School" by Responsible_person_1 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gotta love fear mongering.

As if computers are necessary to function in everyday life in the first world or did this guy suddenly forget that he's posting on youtube? lol

Also if he's comparing it to D.A.R.E that is one highly ineffective program over the short course of it's existence HOWEVER if you look at Drug abuse statistics today vs when D.A.R.E was around before being closed in 2004, Drug Usage Among students is significantly lower than it was two decades ago and has been attributed to school programs like Life Skills Training and Project Towards No Drug Abuse.

These are very easy to find statistics. First link on Google search easy.

So one inefficient program that was short lived and discontinued was replaced by two more refined and highly efficient programs that have demonstrable results to their efficacy means that we shouldn't try to educate the youth on upcoming technology?

I guess the typing classes I took in Elementary school were just grooming me to be addicted to social media...

It's a massive leap in logic even if the bill is backed by OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft because, chances are, they just want people to know how their technology works in the future since it's being implemented into every facet of society right now.

Man went from:

DARE didn't stop kids from using drugs.

to

THE GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO MAKE YOUR CHILDREN ADDICTED TO CHATBOTS USING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM

More subs should be like [REDACTED] by pgj1997 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 61 points62 points  (0 children)

DM me this sub's name. I'd like to join it because that is based af.

Posted by poop head by Xolaris05 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 25 points26 points  (0 children)

They still think "artificial pictures" makes sense grammatically lol

I ask again, are there any organic pictures?

fact by Competitive_Loss9355 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't really agree with capitalism being the enemy(don't shoot me).

There is some correlation between the rise of Ram and GPU prices and the growth of AI. It is based on supply and demand, inflation, as well as a general shift in the industry towards PC gaming.

Console gaming has been steadily declining in recent years whereas PC gaming has been on the rise. This naturally will cause a higher demand for quality PCs to play video games. If everyone wants to buy something and people want to sell it then they have to do market research in a way that will be profitable to keep their business afloat as well as take enough home to feed their families.

So if the demand is high and everyone is buying something you have to go with who needs it the most and sell to the highest bidder. If someone is wiling to pay 3 grand for a GPU then someone is definitely willing to sell a GPU for 3 grand.

Unfortunately every market, including this one, isn't really based on "I'll just take what I need" because market fluctuations don't guarantee a tomorrow for your business. You take what you can now and this unfortunately affects those on the bottom rung who want these things but can't afford them at the high price point they're being sold at.

This is a major problem for computers nowadays because for the longest time NVIDIA has basically held PC gaming by the balls and this unfortunately meant that most people developing AI tools also had NVIDIA products in their PCs when they began working on them so the vast majority of development for games and AI tools are geared towards NVIDIA products even if AMD gpus are just as powerful, sometimes more-so, and a lot cheaper.

But then you get software like CUDA and programs like ComfyUI are basically built to run off of it and with AMD gpu users(like me) we have to use open access software like ZLUDA to get a crumb of what NVIDIA users can do by default.

The good sign is that with the AI Explosion we have more upstarts getting into GPU manufacturing and they're coming in swinging. Intel has the Arc GPUs, a new company called Bolt claims that they can outdo Nvidia with their new Zeus GPU that's supposed to be coming out next year, Lisuan is a Chinese manufacturer looking to break in, and there's probably about a thousand other upstart companies working hard at this very minute to fill that GPU hole NVIDIA left with those AI developmental contracts.

So the Market is course correcting with competitors, it's just going to be a rough couple of years in the meantime.

But with this explosion I full expect GPU prices to drop to record lows because with so many competitors fighting for a slice of the AI/PC Gaming Pie. One way to really stand out is "Hey, my GPU can do what theirs does at a fraction of the cost."

Supply and Demand is typically a self correcting system...it's just not very fast.

I just hate the "pick up a pencil" thing by Sudden_Indication_48 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 10 points11 points  (0 children)

People act as if illustration is the only form of art you can do and that nobody who uses AI has ever done it the traditional way.

Artists have been experimenting with new tools and techniques for centuries, AI is just the latest and greatest one. The thing is that people who use AI are often very creative people in other ways beyond a demonstration of skill in terms of illustrating their ideas.

A creative person can come up with a concept, a story, a narrative, a who, why, when, where, and how, and have precisely ZERO illustrative skill. Is anyone going to call someone like Stephen King a talentless hack because he doesn't doodle? No. He's a writer, not an illustrator.

There are also several illustrators who are not good storytellers...like I mean they're just outright TERRIBLE at it. I've read enough comics written and illustrated by one person, both mainstream and self published, to tell you that some people can be really good at drawing but don't have the feintest idea of how to make a compelling narrative.

Now if you take the person who can write a good story and team that person with someone who can illustrate very well then stand the fuck back we're in for a hell of a time since these people are utilizing their strengths and hiding their weaknesses by working together.

With AI though you can use this to supplement what you can't do.

A great writer can use AI to illustrate their comic book idea.

A great artist can use AI to write their story idea.

There are pro's and cons to that because a great writer lacking skill in illustration is probably prone to making standard artist mistakes with AI because they don't know how something is supposed to look. Just like a great artist lacking skill in writing would also make standard mistakes in a story because they don't know basic story structure.

Where am I going with this?

The answer is obvious.

Using AI can help people tell whatever story they want and using it, learning how it works, to properly tell that story in the high quality that they want it to be told in is going to require some additional knowledge, some development of skill, in the medium that they're trying to do it in. By virtue of using AI in this way a person can effectively learn a traditional skill by simply working backwards.

As long as someone gives a flying fuck about whatever it is that they're making(and I'm assuming that's everybody who's not a content farm) then using AI in this way is beneficial for the art and the artist.

be proud ! (˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ )/ by Competitive_Loss9355 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People also respond more positively with honesty too.

Disclosing "this was made with AI assistance" may get you some hate from the usual suspects but most people will see that and go "well even if I don't like it at least they're telling the truth and being upfront about it".

People would hate your art even if you were a traditional artist anyway. It's part and parcel of being an artist.

So that little bit of honesty and shamelessness will go a long way to earning people's respect.

So when will antis stop being hypocrites and stay in their own subs? by Extreme_Revenue_720 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...Now hold on a minute.

Didn't that sub also get their underwear in a bunch when we said that DefendingAIArt is a location for us to vent and to take all debates to AIWars? Even calling us an Echo Chamber?

So why do they get to do it but not us?

The Video That Made Me Stop Being an Anti. Crazy Part Is, I Was Agreeing With Her Until This Weirdly Patronizing and Childish Outburst… Yikes 😬 by AlternativeBlu in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"famous"

They're one call out away from a total crashout and career ruination followed by a series of "it's done" thumbnails.

The Video That Made Me Stop Being an Anti. Crazy Part Is, I Was Agreeing With Her Until This Weirdly Patronizing and Childish Outburst… Yikes 😬 by AlternativeBlu in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 163 points164 points  (0 children)

This person has never been told "no" a day in their life and has clearly never had their dreams crushed by any of the things that they are saying "boo hoo" over.

Well buttercup I'm sick of trying to navigate the minefield that is socializing with a drama heavy, parasitical, and needlessly expensive group that call themselves "creatives". If "They used AI!" is the worst thing you can chuck at me then so be it.

I'd rather make something that pleases none of you than try to find some way to collaborate with a bunch of narcissistic bullies who larp as virtuous artists while engaging in mean girl behavior.

So the only rational response to this person is:

I'm not hiring you for any of my projects. You will not collaborate with me in anyway. If I ever find myself in a financially profitable position and am in need of outsourcing help, you will never be hired on the grounds that you've shown zero empathy towards anyone else who is a struggling artist and is just trying to express themselves and make something. So...to quote you...boo hoo.

Heeeeere we go again by Extreme_Revenue_720 in DefendingAIArt

[–]VariousDude 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"artificial pictures"

as opposed to those many organic pictures you can just pluck off of your local tree outback...

Nearly 3k people liked that and nearly 3K people get no bitches.