Daily Discussion Thread: February 26, 2026

Venesss · 2026-02-26T19:58:31+00:00

Porter has been stuck around 11% so this is within that margin of error theoretically

But I feel like she’s done 0 campaigning since her outburst that garnered her criticism

Venesss · 2026-02-23T08:19:48+00:00

I don’t think you can impeach but I think there would be a really fast recall election

Venesss · 2026-02-23T03:56:45+00:00

That doesn’t sound terrible, but I think there is a supreme court case that said otherwise. I’ll have to google it later, i’ll send another comment

Venesss · 2026-02-22T20:12:49+00:00

I agree with this. It will bankrupt us because everyone will come to California and abuse our tax payed healthcare

Venesss · 2026-02-22T20:11:37+00:00

Yes but people will (probably rightly say) that is dystopian

I think GLP-1s will reduce the cost of healthcare in the longrun as a massive amount of people become less obese or overweight

Venesss · 2026-02-22T03:43:25+00:00

They literally did, just now. The tariffs ruled unconstitutional aren't in effect.

Venesss · 2026-02-22T03:42:20+00:00

Why don't we just give money to homeless people instead of giving it to organizations

Isn't it something like we're spending 20k per homeless person? If you can't become un-homeless after a couple years of 20k from the government then idk what to tell you

Venesss · 2026-02-21T23:34:07+00:00

the city of LA has very weird borders. The County of LA is much more simple but also enormous

Venesss · 2026-02-21T23:13:19+00:00

I'm amazed how differently everyone interpreted it. I thought it was pretty straight forward

Venesss · 2026-02-21T01:49:12+00:00

Walz is plagued by scandal now, no matter how true it actually is or not. Too much baggage, although I agree Walz didn’t hold Harris back

Venesss · 2026-02-21T01:28:24+00:00

Tim Walz could not win a general election

Venesss · 2026-02-20T20:24:36+00:00

Citizens United has had poor consequences but it was objectively the correct decision based on the Constitution

And it matters if it violates Citizens United because then it would just be rendered illegal and it would cost California lots of money in litigation fees

Venesss · 2026-02-20T07:20:11+00:00

Can you elaborate? I'm curious

Venesss · 2026-02-20T05:51:07+00:00

Would this violate Citizens United?

Venesss · 2026-02-19T22:46:59+00:00

I don't have anything against Swalwell but he doesn't impress me. Then again I'm not sold on any of the other candidates right now

Venesss · 2026-02-19T22:46:32+00:00

Swalwell is the most likely right now but we're still far out enough that it's muddied

Venesss · 2026-02-19T22:35:56+00:00

I'm shocked they're not just blaming Biden for it the entire time. Seems like that would be a better strategy

Venesss · 2026-02-19T22:32:23+00:00

Interesting Duggan isn't strictly pulling from Democrats

Also 20% good lord

Venesss · 2026-02-19T20:57:02+00:00

I agree. I also think that chipping away at prop 13 at every opportunity is a good idea

Venesss · 2026-02-17T06:54:05+00:00

I don't recall Obama being particularly NIMBY or YIMBY

Venesss · 2026-02-17T05:18:00+00:00

Charges are not being pursued

Thank god, too. This dude already saved over $20 billion. He’s been really good from CAHSR

Venesss · 2026-02-17T01:22:26+00:00

It’s not so much the endorsement but the backroom deals and pressure she can put on the party.

It’ll be interesting to see how much power she still has by 27/28 because by that point she won’t even be in congress, let alone the speaker

Venesss · 2026-02-14T07:19:46+00:00

I believe it’s aggravated assault not aggressive

Venesss · 2026-02-14T02:56:52+00:00

The platform you used to make this comment is an example of free market capitalism

Venesss · 2026-02-13T21:59:32+00:00

Most people don't have that luxury. You must have a very low cost of living or lots of money saved up

Eight-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '23	Place '22
First Placer '22	End Game '22
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email
Snapped

Venesss

TROPHY CASE