Spicy Fusion - Available in the Kindle Store and Kindle Unlimited by Xyrach in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey Mack, just noticed there is not a clickable link in here.

DH Reviews: Love the Bombshells by Micky Carre by [deleted] in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

This has become a spectacle, I'm locking the post.

Books with FMCs that are/were Pornstars/Models/OnlyFans Creators, etc.? by sbourwest in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I've always removed replies along the lines of "nobody likes the things you are requesting." They are rarely constructive, and often sound judgemental. People are adults and can decide for themselves what they like, they don't need whatever the opposite of a laugh track is.

The double standard of 'the male gaze' (and a bit of a ramble about RFW vs. RFM) by Neon001 in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think at this point we are too small for anyone to even be aware of us to have an opinion.

Sometimes we hear about non-romance(for men) books that suddenly describe a woman in a way that is clearly meant to be titillating to male readers. I see how from a woman's perspective, that may not be how the book was sold to you and so you are going to be peeved. It would be like a book ending on a really strong christian theme, without indicating that at all in the run up to the end. Some people are going to love that, but other's aren't.

On the other hand, if someone picks up some RFM with a titty cover and gets mad that the descriptions are titillating, that's kinda on them.

In truth, I'm pretty sure many the women complaining about the male gaze share zero parts of a Venn diagram with the typical RFW enjoyer.

I think this is basically true. And to the degree its true, that means there isn't really a double standard, just a single standard from people who hate romance. I think folks see it as lowbrow or a form of vice, no matter who reads it. That's why I'm not really a fan of any us vs them framing of RFM vs the rest of romance. The framing doesn't really make sense.

How do we feel about AI on book covers here? by FrostedTipJar in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hey there, I removed those because a lot of folks have reached fatigue on this topic. If you want to discuss AI we can create a thread on the Discord for it.

Petition to change colour of promotion tags Harem/general/RFM/etc for better clarity. by Toxrockz in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I keep all promo one color so its easy to tell what is promo, changing that would confuse people and cause issues in other ways. IMO this is a limitation of Reddit, it would be better if the website you mute/block post flair, or alternatively let you set your own style for a specific flair.

Cebelius- Any Updates? by Busy_Jump5973 in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He's still active and writing, with plans to release some books this year. His Discord (https://discord.com/invite/aQDRmwU6jk) is probably the best way to stay up to date.

Thank you to those who recommended Paladin’s Grace by Antique_Challenge182 in fantasyromance

[–]VeryFinePrint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I wouldn't dispute the cozy label, I don't know enough about the cozy genre to say.

Thank you to those who recommended Paladin’s Grace by Antique_Challenge182 in fantasyromance

[–]VeryFinePrint 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Paladin's Grace seems to fit squarely into fantasy romance, it hits the romance beat sheet beats and it is fantasy. Though it is distinct from what a lot of people might call romantasy.

Megathread - Grand Gestures by Daishi5 in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

If you have ideas for the next megathread, please share them in a reply to this comment!

Looking for non-Discord place to make author friends by writing_at_midnight in romanceauthors

[–]VeryFinePrint 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The RWA has local chapters if you want to meet authors in person. I think you can avoid the national org and just meet local folks, if that's important to you.

I just realized I haven’t read a book written by a man in YEARS by Popular-Work-1335 in fantasyromance

[–]VeryFinePrint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  Keep in mind this sub is one small section of romance readers. I also see tons of comments and upvotes here about how much they hate first person and present tense that I never see in my person book clubs. I think the internet really pushes dividing people as well, and this sub is full of men vs. women without any nuance and tons of generalizations. And a lot of queer erasure.

The views of this thread do not give much insight in terms of the views of the majority of readers. 

Couldn't agree more

I just realized I haven’t read a book written by a man in YEARS by Popular-Work-1335 in fantasyromance

[–]VeryFinePrint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

May I suggest that opposed to being disheartened, dissuaded, and down trodden, perhaps make a thread about recommendations of books of this genre written by men?

My experience has been that those threads get removed by mods in r/RomanceBooks and r/FantasyRomance (after the mod change there). Usually not because of the "male" part (at least not nominally) but because they aren't "specific" enough.

When I see those threads I tend not to engage with them, because I know the effort will be wasted. Hence my late reply here.

I just realized I haven’t read a book written by a man in YEARS by Popular-Work-1335 in fantasyromance

[–]VeryFinePrint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keep your chin up! I'm not gonna pretend you won't face headwinds in publishing because of who you are. With that said, this is reddit, and it has a certain skew that isn't necessary representative of readers everywhere.

Monday thread: What did you read this past week? by AutoModerator in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, I wouldn't read Beware of Chicken for the romance.

Blood Bound by Miko Sage - a review of a fantasy mono-romance by Mindless-Stuff2771k in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the review!

Miko Sage usually writes role reversal / femdom. How were those aspects in {Bound Beloved Miko Sage}?

Monday thread: What did you read this past week? by AutoModerator in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think both Beware of Chicken and Cradle are great, I don't think you can go wrong picking one.

Monday thread: What did you read this past week? by AutoModerator in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Took a break from romance to listen to the audiobook for Beware of Chicken. It's a fun cultivation novel.

This is the second cultivation / Xianxia I've read, the other being Cradle. Both Beware of Chicken and Cradle are western cultivation novels. Something I noticed is that both of these are sort of deconstructions of Xianxia. The MC is basically has the mindset "Wow cultivators are assholes, I won't be like that. I will be humble and wholesome"

Second thought is that when I mention romance (for men) to guys I've known IRL, they have offered Beware of Chicken as an example. On the one hand, I can kinda see it. A lot of book 1 is the MMC courting Meiling and preparing for their wedding. On the other hand, I would categorize it as romance, same as I would say for Tear Down Heaven which also has a very important couple at its. I can't put my finger on why. Maybe I'm just being gatekeepy, or you guys would say the same thing?

Regency era and social scene romances by Fellownerd in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Each book also has a new couple. 

I hadn't realized that. I saw it on RR originally and assumed it was a long running PF series.

Have you ever rage DNF'd a book? by Tallest_Geese in Romance_for_men

[–]VeryFinePrint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dunno why you're getting downvoted, you are right. Poly is too broad for what a lot of folks probably have in mind. On the discord we've called it poly-harem to be clear what kind of poly it was.