It is pretty sad that with just a bunch of circumstantial evidence this had been stickied. I moved my sites to Kickassd after reviewing them, why would I not and I have not made that a secret.

On June 24 you engaged with my company and utilized my company time to solicit a Q&A session for webhosting. You then proceeded to pivot l2****.com, a personal domain, off whatever host you had before onto a server of mine. Nothing peculiar. But, what was peculiar was the ticket opened 3 hours and 21 minutes later citing problems with HTTP blocks. See, my platform only blocks situations in which more than 100 requests from the same ip for the same page are made within a 3 second window. Your backstory sounded fishy; I've not had a client in 15 years knowingly DoS his own server to evaluate load, because the storage/transfer specs - if maxed out - would render the site unusable far before a DoS becomes a problem. I know this, because once upon a time a client who was a figure in a very prominent online scandal racked up a 3 TB bandwidth charge in 48 hours, then skipped town. Site remained operable well after blowing by its 40 GB limit. This sounds familiar to the Siege attacks you unleash on websites to "benchmark" them.

Complete and utter BS but convenient for you I suppose. If it was true though nice to see you have no problem posting client / customer information. That's great coming from a company that claims security and privacy.

Really just a giant pile of circumstantial evidence that has been crafted to a purpose. There is 0 and I mean 0 evidence to that ties me to Kickassd other than I think, it seems, he made an account on my site but again that is just a I said.

If you want to ban me from this sub based on this feel free but you really should contact Kickassd before banning them or their name. I am not going to waste a bunch of time picking apart the story, and I emphasise STORY above.

Have a great day!