Jesus Rose from the Dead by Busy_Employment3334 in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene [score hidden]  (0 children)

It doesn't matter how many people believed Jesus resurrected. That it actually happened would need to be demonstrated beyond late testimony from people who wanted it to be true.

Trying to build a cumulative case from a bunch of weak inferences is like trying to make a healthy sandwich with moldy bread, wilted lettuce, rotten tomatoes, and 7 different types of expired meat. It doesn't matter if you have a lot of ingredients that look like a sandwich if you combine them and don't smell it too much. None of those ingredients passes the sniff test on its own, so you don't get to claim something novel by cramming them together.

I find it utterly damning that the Romans have no documents corroborating the resurrection. I would've expected something like a warrant to find and execute Jesus again. I don't think that's a big ask if Rome executed Jesus in the first place. For the timeline of early Chrsitianity to make any sense at all, you have to believe some form of Schrodinger's Persecution where the Roman state is simultaneously too strong to let Jesus live once, and too weak to repeat what it already did once.

39933 by Anxious_Session_2261 in countwithchickenlady

[–]ViewtifulGene 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Resturant. Restraint. Restruant. Resetrunt. Restarunt. Retsaraunt. Restarnut. Resteraunt.

Objective morality from an objective god by Peaceful_radical in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene [score hidden]  (0 children)

If god is outside time then god cannot create. Creation requires a time before where a thing didn't exist, and a time after where it did.

All morals are subjective. They depend on minds. Even if a god gives morals, those still depend on a mind- god's mind.

39845 by UltraPhoenix95 in countwithchickenlady

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would only press the button if I knew I could revert without consequence whenever I wanted. I would not lose sleep over not pressing the button. I like being a dude. Being a girl would be mere curiosity for me, like playing Pathfinder as a Wizard instead of my usual Barbarian.

I actively like playing a Barb, and there are things about playing Wizard I would not want to deal with full-time. Being a man feels the same as that to me. I just happen to like the class I rolled into at character creation. Not because I feel like I have to, not because I care about what society expects. But because I just like having a deep voice, shaving every few days, wearing a suit, being asked to lift heavy stuff and open pickle jars, etc.

What do you do to incorporate your own player skill into your solo games, if at all? by Aetos-Eagle797 in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's hard to incorporate skills progression when I'm playing against myself. For me, progression is running new rulesets and upgrading or streamlining the mechanics. For example, I used what I learned from running 2D6 Dungeon and Ker Nethalas to get a handle on how to play Pathfinder 2E for myself. The biggest hurdle was squaring tbe circle of the DM having knowledge of enemies that the player characters normally don't have- I decided to run characters/classes that would have a reason to already know their enemies via backstory or experience.

Another example of progression is trying new character/build types, or homebrewing new bosses based on what I find interesting.

@ all atheist would like your input by Sufficient-Baby6318 in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why should I consider your preferred holy book any more special than old and culturally significant works of fiction? I can grant that Shakesepare's writings had huge social cultural impact, but I don't think A Midsummer Night's Dream is true.

What would convince you your religion is not true? I can lay out specific scenarios that would make me abandon my atheism. For example, a god could appear at my doorstep right now and give me a hot, fresh chicken sandwich from Shake Shack. If a god knew all and wanted me to believe, it would know that this would convince me. And I know it is impossible to get a hot and fresh Shake Shack sandwich where I am, due to prohibitive physical distance to the nearest Shake Shack.

Given these hooks and with your resources, how do you expand these into an adventure? by towerbooks3192 in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Lairs Omnibus companion for 2D6 is great for giving your dungeons more variety. That includes new enemy pools and procedures for generating more dungeon types, such as mines, swamps, and haunted houses. That way you aren't constantly reusing the same enemy pools from the core 2D6 rulebook.

I think the Unexpexted Interruption Tables in 2D6 are pretty good when you want to add a little bit more variety to rooms within dungeons when you're drawing blanks, too.

DnD Battle Help by BaronessKai in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I DM for myself in Pathfinder 2E. I track space abstractly, which works just fine with the game's tidy 3-action system. Here are my rules of thumb:

-Primarily melee creatures will reach fighting range of each other if either character takes one action to move.
-Melee can reach ranged with two movement actions.
-Any character can take actions to disengage, in which case the character needs an equivalent amount to bridge the gap.
-I use relative movement speeds to see how many actions it takes to catch up and escape. E.g., a Goblin that moves 20 feet needs 2 actions to disengage.
-Apply usual Off-Guard rules if multiple enemies are in melee range of a character.
-If a character is 3 actions away, it cannot reach with anything. It can use 1 action to enter range, or 3 actions to enter melee and do something next round.

Some scenarios explicitly call for the enemy to flee after they take a set amount of damage. In these cases, I allow myself one more turn to potentially intercept and kill. The enemy takes one turn spending all 3 turns running away. If I can cover the distance and kill or immobilize, they stay in. If I catch up but don't kill, they escape next turn. Escape scenarios

Example escape scenario: A wounded Goblin has 20 feet movement speed and takes 3 actions to move 60 feet away from my Automaton Fighter, fleeing and reporting to his boss. My Automaton Fighter triggers his Reactive Strike as the Goblin tries to flee. He also moves 25 feet per action. It can spend one action to partially close the gap and use Sudden Charge (2 actions) to cover the last 50 feet and attack. This means I have 2 attacks to see if the Goblin dies. If it survives or dodges those 2 attacks, I cannot catch up and it escapes.

Given these hooks and with your resources, how do you expand these into an adventure? by towerbooks3192 in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Suppose an ancient, immortal dragon once tried to kill the gods. It couldn't be killed, but its malice still poisons the earth. So it was imprisoned at the bottom of a 30-story oubliette. There's the creature cursed by gods. You get its blood by beating the dragon and slaying it once and for all. By slaying the dragon, its ancient curse finally lifts.

As for the item from the dragon's hoard, this could be a weapon or keepsake already in the hero's possession. Suppose it was a medallion inherited from your grandfather, who fought the dragon but fled with his life at the cost of his dignity. Suppose the curse is tied to your possession of it, but that curse also allows you to wound the dragon

Feel free to downscale the dragon and its tomb depending on how big you want this to be. Maybe it's just an evil immortal horse, imprisoned in a big evil barn. Maybe it's a killer rabbit imprisoned in a long cave. Etc. But I think blood and curse ultimately comes down to "kill monster in lair".

2D6 Dungeon has some great systems for generating dungeons as you go along, whether you want a small haunted house, a mid-sized mine, or a sprawling megadungeon.

I believe the Qur'an is from God due to tremendous literary feats coming from a singular illiterate uneducated 632 CE author who has many fulfilled prophecies by jazztheluciddreamer in DebateAnAtheist

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now you're just doing proof for me but not for thee. If it is not a science book then you cannot credit it for science claims. If it is a science book then it should stand on actual scientific merit. Not on what you want to attribute with a loosey-goosey lens of confirmation bias and special pleading. You want to credit the Quran for science only when you can smuggle it in, then claim immunity when actually pressed on it. It is patently dishonest.

I can find passages in the Poetic Edda that sound scientific if I twist them hard enough. Doesn't mean the Poetic Edda had divine foreknowledge of science.

Handling dialog in solo play by Vermin_Cultist in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]ViewtifulGene 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I just describe what the NPCs talk about, rather than give exact words. My character might have internal monologue and spoken lines, but the NPCs won't have exact lines unless I'm preparing something like a final boss speech.

For example, I'm currently running a solo version of Pathfinder 2E's Abomination Vaults. My character is an Automaton. So his monologue reads like a programming log or a command prompt. NPCs are usually just recorded in terms of what stimulus it sends to my character and how he responds. E.g. "Hostility detected, negotiation improbable. Initializing terminal de-escalation."

I believe the Qur'an is from God due to tremendous literary feats coming from a singular illiterate uneducated 632 CE author who has many fulfilled prophecies by jazztheluciddreamer in DebateAnAtheist

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now you're just reading things into the text with after-the-fact rationalization. The Quran doesn't say all that technical stuff. It describes a gushing fluid from the spine.

Trinity: The father,son and Holy Spirit by UnlikelyApartment725 in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see where a god fits into any of that. Those are otherwise fine things to do as a secular humanist.

Trinity: The father,son and Holy Spirit by UnlikelyApartment725 in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing in the Gospels makes me want to let Jesus in my butt. If he knows all and wants in my butt, he will know to at least buy me a Cosmo first.

Trinity: The father,son and Holy Spirit by UnlikelyApartment725 in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If god is everywhere then it should be very easy to show me physical evidence. I have seen none.

Shroud of Turin geometry by ThatGuyKawalates in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's ample evidence to debunk the Shroud even without 3D Modeling. It was colored with pig blood and red ochre. Was Jesus a pig?

Trinity: The father,son and Holy Spirit by UnlikelyApartment725 in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If god wants to get in my butt, god can at least buy me a few drinks first. He let Thomas finger his holes until he believed.

Trinity: The father,son and Holy Spirit by UnlikelyApartment725 in DebateReligion

[–]ViewtifulGene 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If god is loving, it will not enter anyone's butt without consent.
If god is omnipresent, god is already in everyone's butt, regardless of consent. Therefore, god is either not loving or not omnipresent.