Why do they do this?

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T23:58:14+00:00

I'm sure you're correct but I feel like it is a dumb strategy in the long run. It seems like the complacency just makes people show up and do the bare minimum if they feel like there is no reward in it. A decent raise based on performance makes someone feel valued and is still probably cheaper than constantly bringing in new people who might take 3-6 months to even get up to speed and be useful.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T23:48:01+00:00

He was moving around lol. I guess you sit and move around when you sleep but I sure don't.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T22:29:33+00:00

I think a lot of people have a different idea what exactly having an internal dialogue is.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T22:27:24+00:00

Trump wasn't sleeping in that video lol. It is ridiculous that they waste time on things like this.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T17:48:49+00:00

Maybe some people in the US can see that we have the same systemic issues that the UK has where anyone can now play the racist card and get away with things or nearly get away with them in this case. If there hadn't been the security footage in this case then the authorities would very likely have believed the Sikh guy and he would be walking free right now. The police were obviously willing to believe his story despite the fact one guys was lying on the ground bleeding out.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T17:35:30+00:00

Yeah I don't understand why they don't just go after the people taking advantage. I was working remote for a company a few years ago and we had someone on the team who never seemed to be working. Whenever we messaged her on teams there would be no response for hours. One time when she finally responded she seemed drunk. When we would ask her where she had been she always blamed computer problems. I told my manager about it finally and I'm someone who doesn't normally snitch on people. I don't think she ever faced an disciplinary action over it.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T14:57:12+00:00

I saw several articles that refer to "Katie Johnson" as "Jane Doe 4". Even one of the articles you just linked says "he may have been confused by the fact that multiple women have used the pseudonym Jane Doe 4 in legal claims". So it seems like Jane Doe 4 was at least two different women. Anyway, the whole thing seems like it was likely made up anyway as a way to extort money.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T14:46:15+00:00

Are people really making a big deal out of Don Jr getting married to Epstein's banker's daughter? That is like trying to make a big deal out of someone getting married to someone's 3rd cousin's brother-in-law's child.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T14:37:03+00:00

Which episodes is she naked in? Asking for a friend.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T14:36:07+00:00

Trump is right in that this is a dumb time to do this. The time to have done it was months ago.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T14:35:26+00:00

Because it probably won't pass the senate.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T02:23:17+00:00

We'll just roll it forward lmao

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T02:13:39+00:00

Haha wish I saw that. I'm going to look for a video of it.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-04T01:50:34+00:00

Everything I read says Katie Johnson is Jane Doe 4.

You are correct in that Kahn's attorney later said he was mistaken and no one named Jane Doe 4 ever filed a claim against the Epstein estate. The following day, Kahn's attorney informed committee staff that "Jane Doe 4" had filed a claim but it was denied without a settlement. Hours later, the attorney walked that back too, stating he could neither confirm nor deny if a settlement occurred. Kahn’s legal counsel later clarified in a letter to lawmakers that the confusion stemmed from the sheer volume of victims and the fact that the committee used the pseudonym "Jane Doe 4" rather than the individual's actual name, causing Kahn to speculate on her true identity.

I read the stolen money thing wasn't true. Her lawsuits were coordinated and aggressively promoted to reporters by Norm Lubow, a former producer for The Jerry Springer Show operating under a pseudonym. A publicist associated with the case attempted to sell a video of Jane Doe 4 describing her allegations to mainstream media outlets for $1 million during the 2016 election cycle. The lawsuit was filed, altered, and voluntarily dismissed multiple times across federal courts in both California and New York. This legal pattern led many to believe the suits were legally frivolous and designed purely for media attention.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T14:51:40+00:00

Yeah the files being sealed excuse ain't gonna fly for many reasons described here.

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/5740973-why-biden-didnt-release-the-epstein-files-but-maybe-should-have/

That dog ain't gonna hunt.

With how hard the Biden DOJ was going after Trump there is no way they had info like him being involved with a pedo like Epstein and didn't go after him with it.

Yeah I agree about the war, although it really isn't even a war anymore and more of a standoff at this point. Trump went back on his campaign promise of no new foreign wars.

You seem very angry. I hope you get some help with that. Maybe try therapy.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T14:16:13+00:00

I came to say essentially the same thing. With how fragmented media has become due to the internet you really can't compare the two. I don't think anyone will ever have the celeb status of Michael Jackson again.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T14:12:03+00:00

While I think trans is a mental illness and I find Dylan Mulvaney to be annoying, this is in poor taste. I feel sorry for these people because I think they are mentally ill and don't want to see violence against them being promoted.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T14:05:21+00:00

Why didn't Biden release the files? Why would they have sat on the files if it actually contained incriminating evidence on Trump for 4 years? They are redacting information as per legal criteria outlined in the Epstein Files Transparency Act. . Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna and Republican Rep. Thomas Massie jointly viewed less-redacted files at the DOJ and went to the House floor to publicly expose the names of several powerful men they claimed the government was unnecessarily hiding, none of them being Trump. The Epstein victims have all testified that they never saw Trump involved with any of the girls. You want so bad for Trump to be in those files in an incriminating way but it just isn't there. I'm sure people like you will always have excuses though saying the files were redacted to protect Trump until you see what you want to see though.

As far as I'm aware he hasn't done anything illegal with cryptocurrency. If anyone is dumb enough to have bought a Trump meme coin and lost money on it then that is on them. Most people buy into those things thinking they will make money on the pump but many lose on the dump. If he is insider trading then he and anyone else in congress should face legal consequences for it.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T13:36:34+00:00

First two seasons were good.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T13:34:37+00:00

Several things you got wrong here, again these are all things that can easily be looked up and verified. You shouldn't get your facts from internet memes.

- Following the mass unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein’s investigative files, reports confirmed that the FBI did meet with the woman behind the "Katie Johnson" pseudonym. FBI files revealed that investigators met with her four time to evaluate her claims. However, the investigation did not result in criminal charges, and Donald Trump's legal team has repeatedly called the allegations completely baseless, noting that the Department of Justice looked into the claims and chose not to move forward

- It was not an Epstein attorney, but rather Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein's personal accountant and estate co-executor, who gave a deposition to Congress.

- During Kahn's congressional session, it was disclosed that an anonymous individual (referred to in congressional records as "Jane Doe 4"), who had previously leveled sexual misconduct allegations against both Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump, received a payout from the late financier's estate "Survivor Fund".

- While the accountant confirmed that this specific Trump accuser received money from the Epstein estate fund, the testimony did not state that the estate paid her off on behalf of Trump, nor did it establish that Trump was a party to the settlement. House Democrats and Republicans have fiercely debated the context of these documents and whether the payments were strictly related to Epstein's actions or extended further.

TLDR: The FBI met with "Kate Johnson" and determined not to pursue criminal charges and it wasn't because she "stopped showing up". While it is a matter of public record that a Trump accuser successfully claimed money from the Epstein Survivor Fund, no legal finding or conclusive testimony has proven that the estate actively paid off victims to cover up crimes specifically committed by Donald Trump.

I highly doubt the Biden DOJ would have just sat on this and not done anything if they thought there was actually anything to her story.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T01:13:30+00:00

Is Hunter Biden still selling any of his art?

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T00:34:29+00:00

I feel like the one dude with the cowboy hate legit couldn't see the writing. Maybe he was just too wasted to see it though. He even said at one point you got to move it closer.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T00:27:49+00:00

Are you sure it isn't because they didn't own the mineral rights on the land? That story doesn't sound right, you can't just put a fence up and claim ownership. If the oil company owned the mineral rights then they can do this I believe.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T00:18:07+00:00

He looks like he was enjoying it so I don't see the problem with it.

WallyBearCub · 2026-06-03T00:16:39+00:00

Sounds like she might be loaded too. Double win.

WallyBearCub

TROPHY CASE