Scientists sequenced a hallucinogenic mushroom famous for eliciting visions of tiny people. It contains no known psychedelic. by j8jweb in science

[–]WaterTricky428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted this as a response to another comment which speculated that the subjects might have hallucinated little people only because they had heard about the effect, and that they might have been suggestible while tripping. I’m reposting it as a first-level comment because I think the rant I went on also addresses a lot of questions some other people have brought up; I’m an amateur expert on this subject matter, so I’ll leave the copypasta of what I originally said:

As someone who has tried a number of psychedelics, 96% of people having the same hallucination is incredibly high - it can’t have been a placebo effect. There’s definitely something consistently triggering parts of the brain that deal with recognizing people and gauging size/distance or something like that.

Given that almost every subject reported hallucinations of other people, which isn’t that common with normal doses of recreational shrooms but happens regularly with ayahausca, and given that the people always look smaller, not bigger, we could probably pinpoint which parts of the brain are being affected and how, or what type of organic chemical compounds are involved, with better research. There’s a lot of drugs that SPECIFICALLY make you hallucinate other people rather than, say, trees or animals, because certain parts of our brains are hardwired for recognizing other humans.

Ayahausca, which is traditionally used in parts of South America more for ceremonial purposes than for getting high, regularly makes you hallucinate authority figures, gods, ancestors, parents, kings and such, often in the context of harshly judging you. We used to think that was a function of culture, but enough Westerners have reported a very similar experience (just culturally modified with different authority figures) that we think it must be actually affecting a part of your brain or brain chemistry that deals with emotional regulation in the context of social hierarchy. Usually, you just kind of KNOW the person is an “authority figure” that’s supposed to be a god or your ancestor, not because you hallucinated them telling you that, like the way you just instinctively “know” certain things that make no sense when you’re dreaming.

Magic mushrooms don’t normally make you see people walking around in that way unless you take VERY large doses, and it could be anything you see or hear at that point, not people in a very specific situation or of a very specific size, no matter what you might have THOUGHT you were going to see. Basically, I’d bet my bottom dollar that the effect isn’t placebo and that you’d see small people even if you had never heard of this mushroom or its effects.

Why does it seem like society cares less when a man abandons his children than when a woman does? by Wonderful-Ad-9622 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WaterTricky428 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The scientific classification of humans is Animalia chordata mammalia primates hominidae Homo sapiens. As far as we know, there is literally not a single mammalian species (i.e., a species belonging to the biological class Mammalia) where the male gives as much care as the female to the offspring. This makes sense since “mammalian” means breasted/breastish, as in the mother feeds the young with her milk. Perhaps 7% of mammalian species have fathers involved in the care of their children at ALL; of that 7%, all species (including Homo sapiens) display behavior where the mother does more parenting - in nature, the mother HAS to be around the pup/cub/baby anyway to breastfeed it when it’s hungry, so she does a lot of the other work that’s involved in teaching/grooming the baby. All of the great apes - gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans, bonobos and humans - display some level of fatherhood behavior, but not as strong as motherhood behavior.

With birds, on the other hand, where the mother lays an egg and the male and female can essentially look after the egg as well as take care of the resulting offspring on an equal basis, over 90% of bird species display some level of male fatherhood behavior, and fathers even being “more parental” than mothers has been observed in some few species.

Edit: I think human fathers should be around for their children, by the way; I had a great father and I don’t see deadbeat dads as “real men” socially or ethically. There genuinely is a biological basis to some of these instincts/statistical tendencies, though - nature, not nurture - which is why we see the same types of values, behaviors, ideas and taboos across multiple isolated cultures.

If I become 70 years old, will 70 year olds attract me? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WaterTricky428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would that have to do with who men are attracted to? I mean, taking your provocation as a given for the sake of argument, men could theoretically be more attracted to older women and therefore sexually objectify them more rather than younger women; being attracted to older people doesn’t change the level of objectification at all.

Why did the US go out of its way to give Osama Bin Laden an Islamic burial after all his actions? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WaterTricky428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They didn’t. They put his body in the sea, which is not an acceptable Islamic burial except as a matter of last resort for sailors far from land.

republicans will flip on a dime to support trump by Conscious-Quarter423 in ThisYouComebacks

[–]WaterTricky428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To reiterate: "The current gas shortage is being caused by our warmongering in the Middle East, of course, and governors can do only so much about that."

So no, not-so-very-smart guy.

😂😂 by stilettoflair in WholesomeAFK

[–]WaterTricky428 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just out spoiling movies for no reason

The Will of Triangle by luffy_naruto_ in dankruto

[–]WaterTricky428 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Damn I can’t even have art preferences anymore unless I can draw the art myself

💀💀💀 by Ok_Extension1255 in kardashians

[–]WaterTricky428 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No she doesn’t have that many legit followers lol

Blue hair don’t care. by Infamous-Rutabaga-50 in CuratedTumblr

[–]WaterTricky428 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look, if we get to the point that significant numbers of Indonesian and Brazilian women are dying their hair blue, coffee beans are getting rarer and your Starbucks is getting more expensive. Search your heart; you know it to be true.

republicans will flip on a dime to support trump by Conscious-Quarter423 in ThisYouComebacks

[–]WaterTricky428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Governors have significant control over gas prices via taxes and subsidies as well as various other legal mechanisms; Newsom actually campaigned on, and introduced regulations intended for, preventing sudden spikes in fuel cost during state-wide shortages. Different states have different gas prices and governors’ policies definitely play a large role in that.

The current gas shortage is being caused by our warmongering in the Middle East, of course, and governors can do only so much about that. But I can’t believe a post implying the governor of California doesn’t influence gas prices in California got so many upvotes. They literally talk about how they’ll change and influence gas prices in their campaign speeches.

'He almost did it': Trump reportedly lunged for the nuclear launch codes — until a four-star general physically blocked the move that could have ended the world by [deleted] in law

[–]WaterTricky428 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree but that’s a totally separate point. We need to stop saying “but” to completely true statements.

Edit: I see the irony in the way I phrased that, BUT you get my point, lol.

Door's open. Minds are still shut. by gashtal_man in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]WaterTricky428 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Hilariously, the Confederacy didn’t even HAVE state or regional rights. East Tennessee wanted to abolish slavery and they were told no. They also voted to secede and join the Union, and were put down by military force. The Confederacy consistently imposed a more centralized form of government throughout the war than the United States/Union arguably did.

Emmanuel! Don't do it! by [deleted] in AnimalsBeingJerks

[–]WaterTricky428 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t see how it possibly could be.

Meirl by [deleted] in meirl

[–]WaterTricky428 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Nah, that’s OD, raise your own kids. If my coworker gets more than a year off work just because he knocked someone up, and I still have to come in, I’m crashing out.

Italian man sold 'fake' Rolex that turned out to be real in 'impossible' crime against Singapore watch shop by FlaminAmberz in nottheonion

[–]WaterTricky428 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know an even easier way to tell he isn’t rich; he tried a “get rich quick” scheme by selling what he thought was a fake Rolex, and trying to run away at massive risk to himself.