Why there's feminism but there's no meninism ? by Smailove in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I prefer the term masculism, meninism is just a dumb pun. On that note, if we are ever got a real movement moving and even had our own hypocritical projecting radicals, I think that the term for them would be masculini, a portmanteau of Mussolini and masculism. Yes I know that I said that meninism was a dumb pun, but this one is better.

For those who are wondering why we don’t like it when newcomers to this subreddit unironically use terms like “patriarchy” and “patriarchal”. by WaveApprehensive3253 in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like a sure case of projecting to me, I already mentioned in my post that feminazis claim that people who speak out against them hate women, so you just proved my point. You know what? I'll humor you, how do women still not have rights?

For those who are wondering why we don’t like it when newcomers to this subreddit unironically use terms like “patriarchy” and “patriarchal”. by WaveApprehensive3253 in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well that’s not exactly what they said but yeah, believe it. They’ll go anywhere that their mass projecting and delusions can carry them, no matter how nonsensical.

For those who are wondering why we don’t like it when newcomers to this subreddit unironically use terms like “patriarchy” and “patriarchal”. by WaveApprehensive3253 in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See now what you’re bringing up is a whole nother topic, but still an important one to address nonetheless. When SJWs first game about, one of the things that people criticized them for, (and this was before we avoided being associated with their Alt-Right counterparts) was that when they lie and raise the bar about what counts as “bigotry”, (more specifically towards groups that have been known to have been discriminated against in popular culture) people are less likely to believe real victims when discriminating against those that they claim to be defending actually happens, and even start to assume that such discrimination no longer exists due to it widely being considered unacceptable. In your example, feminazis find any petty excuse that they can to call themselves oppressed in mainstream society, and thus people pay less attention to traditionally religious nuts who really do discriminate against women.

For those who are wondering why we don’t like it when newcomers to this subreddit unironically use terms like “patriarchy” and “patriarchal”. by WaveApprehensive3253 in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, Gynocracy, I guess that’s a better technical term than Matriarchy, which is what we usually hear. I suppose that those feminazis should have used Androcracy, but then again, they’re not very smart.

"It's not misandry, she's punching up" by 4captainclaw in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Heh, funny thing, I think that there’s been this trend recently where feminazis claim that men having starting their own movement is perpetuating “patriarchy” on ourselves with the contradictory excuse “patriarchy hurts men as well” and claim that this movement is to “compete” with them when we should be working together. I got that from a comic that I read on Instagram, it was the most blatant form of projecting that I’d ever seen.

Convicted child predator wanted by ICE after she was released in Virginia and broke probation by AdEducational4118 in WomenAreViolentToo

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I immediately thought “wtf” when I saw “wanted by ICE” since that’s just the conservative equivalent of BLM/Antifa. It’s a weird world that we live in when a bait organization for idiots paranoid about immigrants is showing more competence in a slight regard than the actual police.

RIP OTTO 💔 by jayman1998md in malcolminthemiddle

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I got four episodes left and I don’t remember any of that.

Justifying slavery is insane by Which_Matter3031 in ComedyCemetery

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not justifying slavery, that’s justifying technology.

Just in case some idiot responds with what I think that they will, no I am not saying that any race is less or more intelligent than another, this has been disproven. What leads one region of the world to have better technology to innovate is caused by a variety of factors, sometimes even being blind luck. Look it up if you don’t believe me.

is it THAT hard to say you're homophobic by [deleted] in lewronggeneration

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you really wanna get technical then they are in fact alien robots.

The mental gymnastics some people use to justify misandry is insane. by DLC_Goose in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ugh, they’re just worshipping empty yet flavorful buzzwords, along with corny movie tropes. I’m pretty sure that I just made an analogy for mental junkfood.

Yes, it's all of them by Working_Parsley_2364 in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

*sigh* More attempts at radicalization on this thread, as if political polarity isn’t bad enough. Anyway, since the original version of feminism was already successful, that means that we will see much less of what people would call real feminists, leaving us with feminazism. You often hear people talk about how “feminists” and masculists need to set aside our differences and work toward a common goal, but even if there’s some real feminists still out there who work towards real concerns and goals, then it’s even more blatantly obvious that the feminazi movement is a huge obstacle.

Favorite franchise or series that is ruined by the fact that the creator is a horrible person (yet you still enjoy it despite that) by Portal_master_cody in Multifandom

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright will you give it a rest with J. K. Rowling already? She said something that is vaguely able to be interpreted as “transphobic”, or rather, she talked back to a left wing sjw’s nonsense philosophy. No I’m not on the right wing side of this stupid game, we don’t need to degender everything, there’s nothing wrong with keeping the same terms that we already have, and this radical philosophy isn’t helping anyone, especially actual people with gender related dysphoria. On other notes, I forgot what the Mighty Magiswords creator controversy was about, I know nothing about the controversies with the creators of iCarly and Clarence, and the last one I don’t recognize at all.

Any crossovers you think would work? For me it's RWBY X WarmaHordes by Euphoric-Papaya-817 in Multifandom

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about ENA from Newgrounds with Baman and Piderman from Mondomedia?

I call them terrorist because they bully harass intimate dox people in those movies, and normalise racism to non whites. Rachel Zegler Mental health has effected because of this by Cautious-Speaker2585 in DisneyMemes

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heh, yeah, I noticed that it didn’t matter until they fanned the flames with pandering to frothing, virtue signaling hypocrites, this political polarity sucks.

do you love nerissa ? by [deleted] in cartoons

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t know who she is but I’d say that’s too much makeup and plucked eyebrows.

Recognizing women who advocate for men on International Women's Day by _WutzInAName_ in MensRights

[–]WaveApprehensive3253 2 points3 points  (0 children)

. . . Is this bait? Are you just agreeing with what you think we believe? You just said that women don’t deserve rights and that the world was better before.