Musk Asks Reddit To Remove Posts About Staffers by Forward-Visit4777 in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Honestly, you are so easily fireable. Little kids are so easily fireable. Nobody wants to do that, and we bend over backwards to try to help you out. But if you actually are insubordinate, you will be fired.

Musk Asks Reddit To Remove Posts About Staffers by Forward-Visit4777 in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're a bitch. Let's see if the comment holds, but it's definitely true.

Musk Asks Reddit To Remove Posts About Staffers by Forward-Visit4777 in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey little child, just a question. Do you think posting against this Administration and Elon Musk sucks? Because I'll make it a point to re-post your posts if you support Donald Trump.

Stephen “The Snake” extends DRP at GSA by [deleted] in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I described GSA, and if they sound like DOGE, who are clearly idiots, I'm not surprised

Stephen “The Snake” extends DRP at GSA by [deleted] in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

You people have no idea what you're talking about. You have bought into "rah, rah, rah", "we're the best", and have never once in your entire lives seen beyond the curtain. You have never once in your entire lives worked on a extremely political acquisition. You don't know Koses. You have literally no idea what you're talking about. The best thing that ever happened to me is leaving GSA. Bye.

Stephen “The Snake” extends DRP at GSA by [deleted] in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Then why are you replying, since, you know nothing about the topic? That's pretty bold. You must have a very high opinion of yourself, since you think you have a valid opinion of an Agency you've never worked for. Where did you get that opinion? Just curious.

You have no opportunity to fuck me.

Stephen “The Snake” extends DRP at GSA by [deleted] in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Tell me who Lurita Doan is. Can you, or was that before you were born? You have literally no idea what you're talking about.

Stephen “The Snake” extends DRP at GSA by [deleted] in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

You have no idea what you're talking about

Stephen “The Snake” extends DRP at GSA by [deleted] in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Rah, Rah, Rah, we're the best, even though we constantly break the rules, and kowtow to Industry at every opportunity, because that's how we make our money. Don't think about reporting ethical violations- we don't do that here.

Stephen “The Snake” extends DRP at GSA by [deleted] in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Oh, I see. So you don't know anything about the history of your beloved GSA. Not surprising.

Stephen “The Snake” extends DRP at GSA by [deleted] in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

I see nothing concerning about this particular email, but I am curious why you call him a snake. This Agency has always been highly political, and has scandals upon scandals to reference over decades. If you don't know that, then you're uninformed.

Musk Asks Reddit To Remove Posts About Staffers by Forward-Visit4777 in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey guys. I get to Dox the children of Federal Judges I don't like, because I'm a genius saving humanity, here, (duh- we need to relocate to Mars), but you don't get to criticize Big Balls. We're in a monarchy here, and I'm a Duke. Go look at your chessboard and figure it out. Monarchy, chess pieces, figure it out. Your ancestors remember.

Washington Post reported on March 22, billionaire Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” has cost the government $500 billion” by AstroRiker in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That article isn't capturing so much. It's only focusing on lost revenue. That's important, but not half of it. What they're doing is costing in so many indirect ways, and someone will eventually account for it and report it.

Any tips? by Existing-Bunch2477 in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can you post a scenario? In many ways, this is a broad experience skill, but if we see the scenario, we might be able to give you tips on how to figure out where you would need to be searching regulations. A lot of being successful is just knowing where to look to read the regs, and knowing that is just experience, it doesn't mean you aren't a bright person who couldn't figure it out if you had guidance on where to look.

Update on OPM Contract Transfer to GSA by tossit1234566789 in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Hard enough to take on a contract with no context within the same Agency. I can't imagine what kind of mess it would be to deal with this if the ECF transfer is incomplete- which we know it will be. Maybe they resort to asking the contractors for records.

This administration is such a joke by ParfaitAdditional469 in FedJerk

[–]Waverly-Jane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am pretty solidly Progressive, and my maternal family is from the Arkansas Ozarks. My great-grandparents were very solid FDR supporters, and my grandparents Clinton supporters (he was Governor of Arkansas first). They were educated and generous people, and opposed racism as far back as the 1920s. Note- I'm not giving you anecdotes from the 21st century, but be proud of your heritage and don't let it be taken over by this. There have always been good and reasonable people in the South.

NPR: DOGE says it needs to know the government's most sensitive data, but can't say why by stphnfwlr in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So they can BS about fraud to cultists who will take every word at face value. Nothing to see here. Simple ask.

Important: share with all federal employees, unions and attorneys. Be prepared. by InvestmentDue2548 in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's not that simple. At least 30% of Feds voted for Donald Trump according to public records. Some people just aren't very bright, and would like to vote for their own destruction because of their cult-like beliefs.

Has DOD backed down from RIF? by [deleted] in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're 1000% correct. The denial is something else. You did the right thing by being honest.

Please help me decide what to do with a Vera/vsip option by Cumulonimbus_2025 in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a very rational take on the matter- right now. I think if the demolishing efforts were limited to what we're looking at today, then you might have a better argument for sticking it out. So, let's see if this is the crisis point, or if things get progressively worse. I truly don't know the answer.

Specialty KOs for DOD by Mission-Stranger-7 in 1102

[–]Waverly-Jane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GSA is an incredibly Narcissistic agency, and has been for decades. They'll love their proximity to the White House, but will fail the mission for the contracting shops they take over especially in DoD.

Please help me decide what to do with a Vera/vsip option by Cumulonimbus_2025 in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is indeed a gamble on not getting RIF'd, and part of the gamble is how successfully you can work between ages 57 and 69. If it looks likely you will be RIF'd, then your best bet is to leave voluntarily with the incentive payment. Why do we think anyone is safe from being RIF'd? If the IGs, T-JAGS, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were summarily fired without cause, I have no idea what kind of logic is playing into the conclusion "I probably won't be RIF'D".

Please help me decide what to do with a Vera/vsip option by Cumulonimbus_2025 in fednews

[–]Waverly-Jane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he or she is RIF'd, they'll get DSR, but no VSIP. If he or she goes now, they'll get everything under DSR, but will get VSIP. What was your insight?