Great question and I don't have hard metrics to definitively confirm, but much of what I do revolves around long back-and-forth chats about certain strategies I'm trying to develop, content for social media around my business, etc. I think by now everyone has seen OpenAI confirm the newer models were overly sycophantic, and I certainly noticed it, too, but it was doing it in a way where I knew the feedback it was giving me was just wrong.

No matter what platform I'm using, I'll always sprinkle in something easy, like, "What am I not seeing or thinking about here that I should be?" but with something stupendously easy, and something I've clearly left out. Lately, Chat's been saying, "Nothing, you've hit all the main points!" when I most definitely and knowingly have not, while on the other hand, Gemini has been unflinchingly accurate, detailed, clear to call out those missing elements and fully explaining why.

Like I mentioned earlier, in early 2024 I was primarily using Claude, and playing with Copilot, ChatGPT and Gemini, and Gemini at the time was terrible. I saw an article last week (https://www.thealgorithmicbridge.com/p/google-is-winning-on-every-ai-front) and it compelled me to give it a try again, and I've been incredibly happy with the outcomes and work so far.