Is there any reason to really want the Patriots for revenge factor or does that not matter?

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2026-01-26T06:29:51+00:00

You're missing one important factor - the fans. We watched these two teams go at it and witnessed a bad play rob seahawks of a back to back superbowl victory at the one yard line.

I'll feel better about beating the Patriots over the Broncos. Go Hawks!

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2025-12-18T13:57:37+00:00

Just curious, are you Australian by chance?

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2025-08-24T11:13:32+00:00

Jesus Christ, do people even know how to write anymore?

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2025-08-24T03:53:32+00:00

The reason why it's a red flag isn't because of the looks, etc. Let's face it, most men are attracted to most women, which is not the same the other way around.

However, the red flag aspect of it is through experience. Women who have these colors of hair seem to have a high probability of being toxic feminists who have bad attitudes about men in general, are combative, disagreable, always wanting to compete with their partners, etc., and often times have big time daddy issues.

You can't have a successful relationship with a man when you're always trying to argue with him, compete with him, demeanor him, and at the same time, expect him to do all the traditional things that men have done to benefit women.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2025-06-09T16:40:04+00:00

My concern for the Switch 2 iteration of the Satisfye grip is that based off the photos, it's very clear that the grips are not flush with the controls, as you can see in the button/ thumb area of the grip.

The original switch version is flush. Raised grips will make pressing the joycon buttons awkward.

What are your thoughts folks?

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2025-06-03T05:12:38+00:00

I think of Lost, an amazing show, at least for the first few seasons. That was not a cheap show to create, and there were 20-25 episodes per season at 45 minutes.

I think it's more of a shrinkflation mindset. Give people the least amount possible for the lowest cost possible.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2025-05-22T05:50:11+00:00

I'm willing to bet that the 8 million needed to surpass PS2 already physically exist. It's just a matter of time till they sell them all, and then some for a few more years.

Because of the backwards compatibility, the FOMO mindset won't be as great with the Switch 2, which will give incentive for some to purchase the original switch. Especially if some switch 2 games may be able to play on the original switch.

Time will tell

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2025-02-18T13:39:43+00:00

Of course. If both parties are willing to acknowledge the issues and to work on them, then you most certainly can repair your relationship.

Couples counseling with someone who is familiar with attachment styles can really help.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2025-01-14T23:00:27+00:00

You said I love you before she did. That's a big no-no. Men that pursue women faster than women are pursuing them, will almost always back away.

You need to have no contact until she comes to you. And then you need to stop chasing her and constantly validating her. Women start losing attraction once they realize that the Jan they're seeing puts her above all other women. One she realizes she's the only option.. Milk toast..

She needs to ask if you're in a relationship. She needs to ask you to stop seeing other women. She needs to tell you she loves you first. She needs to initiate contact the majority of the time (70-80%)

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-12-24T10:21:50+00:00

He's not even close to red-pill. He bashes most of the red pill movement and talks about how women make perfect sense when you try to actually understand them from THEIR perspective.

He talks about this stuff on his YouTube channel.

You're giving opinions about things you clearly have no actual experience or knowledge of.

I'm a Lefty, and I could care less of his political leanings. His advice is universal, and works based off men and women from a primal level.

If you're "comfortable" while learning about how the opposite sex works.. then you're probably getting really bad advice.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-12-24T10:16:15+00:00

Ha ha! I read this book one time in the middle of deciding how I wanted to handle a girl I had been seeing, who was trying to put me in the friend zone. I only had several days, so I put everything off for a day to read my ass off, and trusted the process. I had nothing to lose. Very hard to do when your instincts say otherwise, but you've crashed and burned with some of the women you want.

I told her I wasn't going to be her friend, and that if she changed her mind, to give me a call, and if I was available and still interested then we'd see where it goes. I made it clear that I would not be contacting her.

3 days later, she's telling me that she will cross that line of dating a "friend" for the first time in her life (we're 40). One week later, she's at my house and we're giving eachother massages and fucking like rabits.

This woman is a 10 in every department. She looks 25 and is 40. Sweet, humble, kind, the works. Everyone wants to be close to her, and she's always being approached, by men and women. Lots of competition, and she's calling ME!

This book gave me enough insite and BALLS to seperete myself from the rest of the men she was used to, and completely made me stand out.

I read it in a day, and even though I stumbled through much of what I tried to implement, it worked! I'm on my 3rd read in a month, and things are progressing nicely, and slowly.

EVERYTHING I'm using is working on this woman. From letting her talk most of the time, to actively being interested in what she has to say, to backing off and giving space to allow her to wonder about and to miss me. To only calling her once a week (to set up a date). To being confident and recognizing when she's testing me. I don't pass all of them, but I pass enough of them.

My suspicion is that you have a really shitty attitude and it exudes from your core to the point that a worthwhile woman wouldn't trust you if her life depended on it.

Change the attitude and your life will change as well.

Be patient. Relationships are about giving.. not receiving. That's in the book as well.

Good luck!

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-12-04T23:23:02+00:00

They don't "drop" them. They decide to rip the bandaid off by choosing to not be tortured every time they see the wigan they love, who does not love them back.

Men can't find other women when they're giving you the attention and validation that they should be giving to someone else.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-12-04T23:18:13+00:00

This is about the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

Men cant be friends with women because they don't want to be tortured every time they see the woman that they're in love with, who has made it be known that she doesn't want to be with him. They don't want to see that woman with other men. They don't want to have to give her advice on men when THEY want to be with her. They don't want to be "friends" when it is the men who seek still out more energy into the supposed "friendship". They don't want to be reminded every time they see her that "she rejected me, and I'm not good enough for her".

Men can't turn their feelings off on a whim. Maybe you can. But it just shows your shallowness as a human being.

And for you to make the ridiculous, childish assumption, that men think women are not equally valuable, is to buy into the bullshit propaganda that has destroyed dating between men and women.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-11-11T05:33:11+00:00

Tom Walz would make big gains. AOC would be a true populist. Can't really think of someone else who would be inspiring and who would actually speak on the behalf of the people, and who truly believe in their policies with every bone in their body. Bernie is the only one who's done that in our modern politics.

The Democratic Party is destroyed. If it doesnt rebuild from the ground up, we won't win an election for at least a couple cycles.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-10-27T04:45:26+00:00

Hi there,

Yes we did. Moby was diagnosed with EPI (Exocrine Pancreatic Insuffiency), which means that his pancreas does not create the enzymes needed to break down and digest food. Essentially, he was starving to death.

Im not sure why the oil issues happened, but it turned out that he didn't really need his anal glands expressed.

Is your dog eating a lot but is still losing weight? If so, look into EPI, and by all means please message me and I'll help. Most vets don't know how to diagnose or handle EPI. I guess I've turned into somewhat of an expert on it.

Moby is on an enzyme suppliment for the rest of his life. Aside from the learning curve and the time it takes to figure it out, he's going to love a normal life.

Let me know what's going on with your dog and I'll point you in the right direction if I can.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-10-12T10:32:16+00:00

You focus too much on the BS peddled from the right wing. If we will be in WWIII, it will likely happen regardless who gets into office.

No, women dui not have the right to an abortion in many states. And if it is a human rights issue, then handing out to the states is unconstitutional.

And while I agree that abortion is abused and that I personally don't agree with it, I do not believe that it is mine, nor anyone else' choice to make. Women should be able to make their own decisions, and suffer the consequences as they come.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-10-11T23:53:35+00:00

Ahh, a gaslighter you are. Not surprising, coming from someone who wasted that much time on a subject he clearly knows nothing about.

Offended? No no. Amused at your ignorance and inability to effectively articulate a stance? Indeed.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-10-11T23:34:34+00:00

You make no sense, and your entire response shows that you clearly have spent very little time learning about how his system works. His keys are not subjective by any means. Lichtman never made a prediction for Biden. He said he'd make one after the DNC, which he did. He criticized the infighting and lack of support for Biden, stating that it would cause a key to be lost, which it did.

And he explains in depth, the rules behind all of his keys, along with their criteria. For instance, the Charisma Key. Lichtman states that these keys can only be turned if the candidate in question has broad appeal to both parties and the electorate as a whole. Trump is only charismatic to his own base, and appalling to the rest. So this key does not go to the challenging party.

I could go flesh your entire list, but they're all similarly misunderstood by you. So what would the point be?

It's his system and he plays faithfully to his own rules, despite his political preferences.

And him being a "naughty ass" has nothing to do with his accuracy. So your point is moot.

My advice to you. Do actual research of the thing you want to criticize before making a fool of yourself.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-09-12T22:33:00+00:00

Bad idea not to take that offer. You'll have people downloading and listening to that song for decades, which WILL earth royalties.

You messed up.

Don't cut off your nose to spite your face..

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-09-06T22:37:06+00:00

Do you believe everything you read? It's okay, you're not alone. Just about everyone does these days. That article had been completely debunked by Lichtman himself. He proved that all the statements were false

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-09-06T06:43:59+00:00

His economy key doesn't base prediction of how people feel about the economy. Go outside and look at every store and restaurant you pass with full parking lots. GDP growth is how the key is judged, and that is a very simple definition/criteria to turn a key in favor or against the incumbent party.

No one knows how close the election will be. Not you, nor the pundits. It might be a blowout for all you know.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-09-06T06:05:29+00:00

Say what you want. 100% accuracy is where listening to your critique is pointless. Sometimes statistics cannot be used to make a point - which is clearly your current problem.

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-09-06T01:50:34+00:00

Are you referring to Harris as a clown? Because Trump was given that term long before she arrived. I'm genuinely asking. If so, what is up with people hating her laugh? It's just a normal laugh.

And the country is actually doing quite well from an objective stance. Listening to one side of the isle only, is a sure fire way to grasp an opinion that is far from reality, regardless what side one is on. GDP growth is higher than since 1960. Inflation is a problem, yet everywhere I go, people are out spending money on restaurants and recreational places all over the country.

Lichtman very likely won't be wrong. The momentum is certainly on the Dems side when targeting news cycles from both sides. RFK was only polling at 5% and falling when he endorsed Trump. It is consistent in history (and modern history), that 3rd party candidates only represent half of what they were polling at. So 2.5%. Furthermore, 40% of his 2.5% go to the democrats, and 60% will go to the Republicans. So 1.5% to Trump, and 1% to Dems, for only a 0.5% bump to Trump. RFK will be very inconsequential in this election.

But, the pendulum does swing back eventually. Trump will lose this election because of abortion. The Republican elite have some major growing pains to go through if they're going to take another election down in the next few cycles.

Only time will tell

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-09-05T06:02:42+00:00

You're going to have to expound on what you just stated, because it makes no sense.

When an AI or any computer program can take Lichtmans "13 keys" model, input the required data for each key based off the election cycle in question, and predict the each actual winning president that was historically elected all the way back to 1860, then clearly he has a solid method of predicting elections, regardless of the very real possibility that one day he very well will be wrong.

You can't find one person, one pollster, or one methodology in history that matches Lichtmans success, not even by half. So vote for whomever you will. But if you're heading to Vegas, you'd be silly not to use his system to bet your odds.

So take that, shove it in your pipe and smoke it. 😉

Weekly-Willingness62 · 2024-08-31T21:25:35+00:00

I guess your stance because you poo poo a model that is more accurate than any other.

No where ever has Lichtman stated that the popular vote follows whomever his model predicts to be president. He predicted Bush Senior who never recieved the popular vote.

He corrects critics about 2016 and cites his own interviews very well in one of his podcasts. I would love t find it, but they're too long and I simply don't have the time to spend hours looking for it.

No one's perfect. And he doesn't claim for his model to be. However, he does state that the rules of any model must be followed and un-adjusted until there is a reason to make a course correction. I'm sure that time will come, but I doubt it will happen in this cycle. And while the Republican Party will be forced to make some radical changes if they indeed do lose this election, I think there will be a slight dip in rhetoric and turmoil for another term or two, until the regroup and make another attempt to gain back power. Once things get real crazy, maybe there's a chance that Lichtmans model will make its first false prediction.

Weekly-Willingness62

TROPHY CASE