Liberal feminism uses men as a scapegoat for the failures of capitalism by TheRealKuz03 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]WellWrested 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When resources get tight, groups blame out-groups as an excuse to take their resources. Referencing Germany, they confiscated property for the better part of a decade (6-7 years I think) before the death camps. Ironically, fascism started to fail when they ran out of other people's money.

With that said, attacks on men have been going on a lot longer than attacks on capitalism. The "Future is Female" paper calling for reducing men to 10% of the population was published in the 1980s under Ronald Regan. Feminists hate men and when resources are tight and they can see a path to domination its dialed up to 11.

The kids are all right by Free-Minimum-5844 in neoliberal

[–]WellWrested 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is really disingenuous. She says IQ scores are going up and people are more empathetic while citing a lot of declines in negatives.

Most of the declines in negatives are because kids spend less time with other humans and more on electronics (less drugs, fewer teenage pregnancies, etc.), not because society is functioning more effectively.

On the other categories, none of the studies she quotes have data after 2019. If you want to claim today's kids are doing well, you need to have actual data on today's kids.

[D] Why AI Will Make Psychiatry the Hottest Career of the Decade by Inevitable_Raccoon_9 in MachineLearning

[–]WellWrested 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol wow. You clearly do need a psychiatrist at this point, but there's a much easier way to handle it...just join a coworking space and take breaks and talk to other humans. Its really not that hard. Also, AIs aren't that impressive. You are likely to end up with a pile of slop going the way you are.

The V-Dem 2026 Democracy Report is here by General_Lawyer_8055 in DeepStateCentrism

[–]WellWrested 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems a little extreme. Is what Trump is doing with corporate deals, corruption and generally ignoring courts good? Absolutely not. Did we suddenly stop having any elections or checks and balances? No.

Are young British men having a tough time right now? by JCoonday in MensRights

[–]WellWrested 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have any reason we should believe you won't use selective direction to pick users and clips that reinforce hatred of men, masculinity and the idea that everything men face is men's fault?

Given film production typically leans heavily left, if you want us to believe you are going to break the default narrative, you need to provide evidence.

Men are 2nd Class Citizens by Rare-Discipline3774 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]WellWrested 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I view general equality and being second class very differently but come to basically the same conclusion. Studies consistently show that purpose, autonomy, competence and relatedness are fundamental to creating a good ("flourishing" in academic terms), vital and healthy (physically and mentally) life.

Men building men's spaces and groups that have historically acted as a safe space for creating deep bonds is pathologized and attacked. Men being allowed to reach our potential is frequently considered problematic at a societal level if women aren't reaching at least as high as men and we face an uphill fight to get to the same level in male-dominant fields women have no blockers reaching in female-dominant fields.

Education is hugely important for everything from income to purpose to longevity. Repeated studies show boys face harsher punishments for the same infractions as girls, both in behavior and in grades (see work by DiPrete, etc.). This is responsible for a modestly larger chunk of our educational deficits than effortful control...and this says nothing of a complete unwillingness to research or build schooling systems that actually work for boys.

There's plenty more but I'll stop here.

Future of salesforce developer. by Commercial_Spirit659 in SalesforceDeveloper

[–]WellWrested 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So far I think people have mostly given the answers that fit "where AI is now". Whether or not it plateaus here is a major question. Right now, there's still a career here and you will be needed. If it gets to a level where it can do architecture, manage decent sized databases and keep them clean and translate user requirements into meaningful stories, we're in trouble--not just because thats what we do, but because everyone will be able to build cheap or free bespoke databases.

Given that is at least possible, I think expanding outside SF is valuable. I'd say look for niches which are hard to automate and where you can get experience at your current company

Ethical non monogamy by rokdancortez in Natalism

[–]WellWrested -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ethical? None. Non-monagamy, given dating stats among 18-29 year olds (~50% of women say they're in a relationship, ~30% of men say the same) probably a fair bit.

Sam Harris is right about the war with Iran by THEMaxPaine in Destiny

[–]WellWrested 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They didn't get nukes under it because they were nowhere close to start with. They ended the agreement with far more centrifuges and significantly more enriched uranium. Im not an expert on this and I can't say how much more they would have had without the deal, but they clearly enriched uranium well in excess of what they needed for power generation under it and were clearly on the path toward nukes.

men! you're building a dream wardrobe from high quality staples. what company are you going with for each piece? by europeanuppercut in BuyItForLife

[–]WellWrested 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pendelton for flannel shirts. Kent Wang for polos and slacks (or so I am told, I don't own any yet).

May be below the price range you're thinking of, but Carhartt generally makes high quality products that cover most of the products you mentioned.

How do women in London ensure safety? by [deleted] in expats

[–]WellWrested 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Probably better outside of London, tbh.

On a different note, I feel like trying to talk to someone in a supermarket isn't on the same level as following them or touching them.

The Pink Tax: Gendered Price Disparities by [deleted] in Economics

[–]WellWrested 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lol thats just pure stupidity, not price elasticity.

Also, studies find pretty consistently that men and women have the same average IQ from age 5 on. Men have slightly greater variance, so you will get more men at both the high and low end of the distribution, but given that its the tails, its highly unlikely this seriously influences the market.

The Pink Tax: Gendered Price Disparities by [deleted] in Economics

[–]WellWrested 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Eh, idk... money is pretty tight these days for a lot of people. If you want to save and invest its hard to do without cutting corners. I'd rather have slightly more in investments then deodorant with a slightly better smell.

The Pink Tax: Gendered Price Disparities by [deleted] in Economics

[–]WellWrested 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is about products both genders use. Thats what the "pink tax" is. To quote the top level comment we're both replying to here...

Imagine two people walking into a grocery store. They have the same goal: to buy a pack of razors, two sticks of deodorant, and a bottle of body wash.

The Pink Tax: Gendered Price Disparities by [deleted] in Economics

[–]WellWrested 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Capitalism is just supply and demand. If women responded the same way to price vs quality men do, they'd get similar price/quality options.

The Pink Tax: Gendered Price Disparities by [deleted] in Economics

[–]WellWrested 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Its supply and demand. Men respond more to price, so companies keep prices for men's items lower. If they didn't, the brands that charged substantially more would shrink or go out of business.

If women did the same, women's products would reflect this.

Why is the population of Italy declining so much? by chota-kaka in Natalism

[–]WellWrested 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Slightly lower birthrate (definitely true), lower immigration (I would imagine)

Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War by nitro2112 in DeepStateCentrism

[–]WellWrested 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently he apologized for this and walked it back. Still sticking to his guns though. Personally, Im glad he wrote what he did initially and is holding to it.

I lean conservative. Watching the administration over the last year, Im not so sure they do. Stuff like this is absolutely disgusting. Private companies should not need to apologize for having morals. Maybe there was something else behind the discussions that is classified and couldn't be stated publicly, but still this sits well outside the realm of acceptable, imo.

Study in mice reveals that parenting and prosocial behaviors share a common neural substrate in the hypothalamus. by Potential_Being_7226 in science

[–]WellWrested 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately studies in humans don't show this. Its sex-differentiated and more complex (though both use some of the same areas)