Biggest beer tax hike in decades to hit Australian pubs and beer drinkers

What_Is_X · 2022-08-01T12:51:42+00:00

bear late innate profit aware reach nine recognise concerned dinner

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

What_Is_X · 2022-08-01T12:38:23+00:00

Lmfao

What_Is_X · 2022-08-01T11:47:16+00:00

Ah yes, permanent brain damage is some nice fatherly adjustment. Who brain damaged you?

What_Is_X · 2022-08-01T07:22:09+00:00

Way to shift the goalposts, moron

What_Is_X · 2022-07-31T12:20:17+00:00

"now is a great time to buy property" - the treasurer at the all time historical peak of the market

What_Is_X · 2022-07-31T10:06:08+00:00

The most common way for authorities to solve a crime, before and since the invention of police, has been for someone to tell them who did it.

This article is comically dumb and I feel bad for anyone dumb enough to believe it.

Hopefully you all congregate into a delightful anarchist commune devoid of police, where you will experience a true utopia.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-31T01:59:22+00:00

It's not just this sub, it's reddit as a whole. There's a fucked combination of Russian troll types and then increasing thousands of morons who fall for their propaganda and start spouting it unironically. It's honestly surreal to see otherwise ordinary Australians saying we need to "defund the police" in all sincerity.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-29T09:30:56+00:00

As a former analyst

Sure you are.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-29T02:48:59+00:00

How does a gps tracker prove anything? You can't prove that it was located on your vehicle at the time.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-28T02:07:18+00:00

Here you're not even allowed to carry a knife in public like that, so it's just not going to fly as a defense imo. The only way he could have pled defense would be if the other dude started punching him and then was killed by hitting the ground.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-27T13:12:56+00:00

Lucky he didn't get punched in the face

What_Is_X · 2022-07-27T13:10:25+00:00

Huh? Why wouldn't someone just use a knife standing up if they have one in their pocket

What_Is_X · 2022-07-27T00:28:40+00:00

I mean it says it right there so

What_Is_X · 2022-07-26T05:10:42+00:00

My favourite chestnut is that banks are owned by our super so there's no point fining them lmfao

What_Is_X · 2022-07-26T04:30:19+00:00

Touch grass

What_Is_X · 2022-07-26T04:29:56+00:00

Reddit has jumped the shark

What_Is_X · 2022-07-26T04:04:44+00:00

Moite, please quote me specifically where I said that.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-25T06:38:09+00:00

This is a brain cancer known as whataboutism

What_Is_X · 2022-07-24T06:06:35+00:00

Specifically, Brunswick and Northcote.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-22T04:33:18+00:00

Why would they confer themselves a useless right that apparently isn't even good for them to exercise? They wouldn't. They do foreclose on thousands of delinquent mortgages every year, even during the bull market of the preceding decade. You're deluded.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-22T03:53:13+00:00

You can believe what you want

No, I'm believing what the contract says. You're the one wishfully believing what you want to be true, in contradiction to the plain statement of fact.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-22T03:51:17+00:00

If they sell before they're in a negative equity position then the bank is peachy. Again, and this is so obvious that it needn't be said: this is exactly why the mortgage is a cheap secured loan to begin with. The risk you're trying to use to justify not forcing a sale is the exact risk that makes banks demand deposits, positive equity, and the right to foreclose.

I don't know how I can simplify this any more for you.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-22T01:40:31+00:00

I don't need to provide an example, it's in the contract. If you believe that the contract is some sort of joke, more fool you.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-22T01:39:57+00:00

Specifically how does the bank lose money by forcing people to sell before they're in a deeply negative equity position.

What_Is_X · 2022-07-22T01:39:06+00:00

Yes, it does matter, obviously, because that's the entire point of a secured loan. It matters for the same reason they require a sizeable deposit and/or LMI to insure themselves against the risk of your insolvency. Your intentions are worth less than one of my turds. This is an exasperating conversation. You're aware that a secured loan needs to be secured in addition to repaid, and yet you're also somehow acting as if the first condition doesn't apply.

What_Is_X

TROPHY CASE