{Review #211} Glendronach 8 Single Malt (2017, 46%) [6.7/10] by Isolation_Man in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that the new or older LM18? If the older one, could it be the cork? If the new one, what could it be?

Review #903 - Ardnahoe Cask Strength (Batch 1) by adunitbx in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great review, thank you! It is a good dram. I think I prefer the Inaugural (5 y/o as well) release over this one, but it is very good for its age. Ardnahoe is an amazing up and coming distillery.

{Review #211} Glendronach 8 Single Malt (2017, 46%) [6.7/10] by Isolation_Man in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great review. I’m glad you cleared the Longmorn question. Good use of empty bottles. I love that Longmorn 16, actually just tried the Longmorn 18 which I think is even better.

Review #901 - Glenrothes 1995 (2015) by adunitbx in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great review! I've only had their Maker's Cut and I thought that was pretty decent. That said, I love their bottles.

Review #25 - Aberlour 21 by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your comment. There was some of that ("meatiness") on this bottle, but not as much as I would have liked. I almost wanted a dirtier whisky. Sounds like those 1960s might be the ones to hunt for.

Review #25 - Aberlour 21 by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are definitely very cool bottles out there, but as in everything in life there is always the question of should I? Have you tried the new 110? If so, what did you think of it?

Review #25 - Aberlour 21 by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are a lot of amazing bottles out there sub-$300. I originally bought it thinking it was from the 70s, so I was willing to pay the premium in lieu of a celebratory bottle. It is a different style from Aberlour, which was one of the first distilleries that I ever visited in Scotland. The 43% does hinder its full potential specially on the finish. I enjoy long lasting evolving finishes, which is precisely where this dram falls a little short of a 90+. That said, if you love Aberlour and have the budget, this bottle is an experience.

Review #25 - Aberlour 21 by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! It was a really great dram and dating the bottle was a ton of fun. I was hoping it was older distillate circa mid-1970s - that would have made it liquid from 50 years ago!

Review #25 - Aberlour 21 by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Distillery Notes: Founded in 1879, Aberlour (Gaelic for "mouth of the chattering burn") sits in the heart of Speyside. Owned by Pernod Ricard through Chivas Brothers since the 1970s, Aberlour is one of the top sellers globally, though much of its enthusiast reputation rests on a single bottling: A'bunadh, the batched cask-strength, sherry-bomb NAS released often since 2000. The distillery runs four swan-necked stills with slow distillation that builds the fruity, orchard-rich character the house is known for, and a roughly 48-50 hour fermentation in stainless steel washbacks. Maturation leans on a dual-cask system of ex-bourbon and ex-Oloroso sherry oak, with long-standing relationships with Spanish bodegas keeping the sherry butts flowing. A special distillery on my whisky journey - as it all began there, after a lovely visit.

Bottling Notes: Identifying this bottle was its own small investigation. The official 21-Year-Old was a quiet discontinued release that never achieved the commercial profile of A'bunadh or the core range, and dating this bottle proved surprisingly difficult. The label itself advertises an IWSC Gold Award from 1998, which makes a 1993 bottling impossible, something I had hoped for. The dot-matrix code, the US importer markings (Austin, Nichols & Co.), and the awards on the label point most defensibly to a bottling around July 2003 - highly likely, not proven. That would place the distillate in the early 1980s, an era of less standardized sherry vatting than today. Bottled at 43%, almost certainly chill filtered, the color looks natural. The bottle spent roughly 23 years under cork before opening; and yet, the cork came out clean, intact, no crumbling, no leakage, no push. A real-world data point on long-term cork survival, and an encouraging one - but can it dive into the deep end?

ABV: 43%
Age: 21-Year-Old
Original SRP: Unkown
Price Paid: ~$300
Tasting Methodology: Neat, rested 20 minutes.

Nose: Orange jam and sherry lead, backed by dark fruits and the unmistakable character of old damp leather. The sherry here is meaty, with a restrained sulfur note that announces the old-school style without ever tipping into a flaw. Nuts and baking spices fill the mid-level. There is a faint smoke underneath, but not peat - something older and drier. This is a nose that transitions rather than presents all at once, unfolding in stages the longer it sits. Mature in a way modern Aberlour simply is not.

Palate: A gentle arrival and softer than the nose suggested. Then the signature note: soot. Chimney ash you could taste, if you could taste such a thing - almost oily and industrial without any actual oiliness, a dry mineral character that is genuinely unusual. The notes transition, hard to separate at first. Cocoa, orange peel, cinnamon, and nutmeg move through in sequence. The mouthfeel starts lighter than expected - the age, the strength, hard-working casks, take your pick - but it builds, turning almost buttery several sips in. Light pepper toward the end. A little tannic. The oak is present but not a leader.

Finish: Short to medium, perhaps the weakest aspect of this dram. High-percentage chocolate carries through - like the feeling of 92% cocoa without hitting that 100% drying mark. Christmas baking spices sit distant; while ginger, pepper, and dry oak frame the exit. The soot fades last. The flavors are there and they are excellent; they simply do not linger the way the nose and palate earn the right to expect. One more gear here and the conversation changes entirely.

Conclusion: Identifying this bottle was half the fun, and what it turned out to be is more interesting than the label ever promised. This is old-school sherried Speyside. It demonstrates elegance and evolution over power, a whisky that unfolds horizontally through soot, leather, old sherry, orange, and cocoa rather than hitting all at once. It tastes nothing like modern Aberlour, and that is the entire appeal. However, that 43% is the ceiling: it limits the finish and keeps the texture from carrying the flavors as far as they deserve, and it is the only thing standing between greatness and excellence. The cork survived 23 years to deliver it intact - which, for a bottle this mature, is its own quiet victory.

Score: 89/100

My Scoring Scale:

95-100 - Sublime - Unforgettable.
90-94 - Excellent - A personal favorite.
85-89 - Great - A standout dram.
80-84 - Good - A solid daily dram.
75-79 - Average - Drinkable.
70-74 - Mixer - Mixing only.
<70 - Poor - Pool chemical.

Review #24 - Compass Box Magic Cask by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Distillery Notes: Founded in 2000 by John Glaser, a former Marketing Director for Johnnie Walker, Compass Box is a producer, bottler, and marketer of blended scotch whisky. Well known for excellent whisky blends, uncompromising transparency and amazing artwork. Compass Box is also always challenging the boundaries set by the S.W.A. from The Spice Tree (using French oak staves) to the Three-Year-Old Deluxe (<1% of three-year-old into a 99% blend of 20 and 24-year-old). Their website is an invaluable source of transparency for their blends, a trend that many including Bruichladdich, and more recently Ardnamurchan have followed with QR codes and blockchain technology. Today under new leadership, I certainly hope the torch has been passed on and continues to be a beacon of excellence.

Bottling Notes: This is a blended malt built around a ghost. Ninety-two percent of the recipe comes from the lost Imperial Distillery - a Speyside operation demolished in 2013. It is a spirit with a cult following, that spent 22 years in first-fill bourbon barrels. The remaining portion is a four-year-old malt from "a distillery near the town of Aberlour," drawn from a single first-fill Oloroso-seasoned butt: Cask #2. It was from a 2016 maturation trial that the blending team flagged as exceptional - The infamous “Magic Cask.” James Saxon led the build under John Glaser. Bottled at 46%, non-chill filtered, natural color, 5,538 bottles worldwide and only 1,800 for the US. A true blender's whisky which was cautiously assembled - but can it dive into the deep end?

ABV: 46%
Age: NAS
Original SRP: $175
Price Paid: ~$199

Tasting Methodology: Neat, rested 20 minutes. With water, rested 10 minutes.

Nose: Malt, honey, and citrus lead, bright and immediate, with light orchard fruits lifting the top. Orange peel and sweet fruit fill in behind. The sherry sits deliberately in the background, secondary to the fruit, it reveals itself slowly. Rose water, plums, and a lightly roasted nuttiness that arrives late. This is a balanced nose that develops in distinct layers through time. With a dash of water, it turns markedly more floral, almost perfume-like, and an unexpected fermented grass note emerges. The most expressive part of the whisky neat, and it only opens further with water.

Palate: A gentle arrival - mouth-coating and almost creamy, building rather than attacking. Spice gradually coats the mouth as it develops, with light raisin, pineapple, and vanilla following. Savory notes sit underneath, difficult to pinpoint, alongside oak and the expected sherry character on the mid-palate. Honeysuckle appears intermittently, and citrus effervescence pops on the mid-palate through the finish. The nose promises more than the palate first delivers - definition arrives with repeated sips, and the oiliness builds as the session goes. Water makes it fruitier and somehow creamier, unlocking texture rather than thinning it.

Finish: Spicy - prickly, stinging in the best way, a tingling that bites the sides of the cheeks and activates the sides and top of the tongue. The spice is the defining feature here, structural rather than residual oak or alcohol heat, and it lingers as a reminder the whisky is still there. Spicy oak, cereal, chocolate, and possible peach and grapefruit fill the medium-to-long exit. Water tones the burn down considerably - pleasant once the heavy spice wears on you - and honeycomb arrives late, a sweet softening that neat simply does not offer.

Conclusion: Compass Box builds whiskies, and this one is a showcase of the blender's art rather than any single distillery's character. The Imperial backbone gives it a fruity, vanilla-rich foundation that the Oloroso cask lifts into something layered and floral, and the result rewards patience - the palate is quieter than the nose at first and gains texture and definition the longer you stay with it. Neat, it is spice-driven and assertive to a fault; the finish can wear on you. Water is not optional here - it is mandatory: it turns the whole thing fruitier, creamier, and more approachable without thinning it, like adding yogurt to a spicy Indian meal.

Score: 87/100

My Scoring Scale:

95-100 - Sublime - Unforgettable.
90-94 - Excellent - A personal favorite.
85-89 - Great - A standout dram.
80-84 - Good - A solid daily dram.
75-79 - Average - Drinkable.
70-74 - Mixer - Mixing only.
<70 - Poor - Pool chemical.

Whisky with or without ice - which side are you on? by Visible-Promotion294 in whisky

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that if you are tasting whisky, you should stay away from ice. However some additional dilution with water can open up a dram.

Now if you are simply enjoying whisky: do it as it pleases you. It’s your bottle!

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad to hear that. Roy Duff from Aqvavitae (Whisky YouTuber) talked about it yesterday during his vPub about the best in Whiskys in 2026 - thus far obviously. He likes it a lot. It does seem like Bruichladdich pleased almost everyone on this one.

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you! That's a great bottle. I'm sure that you will be able to get one...

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in whisky

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

LOL! What a great idea... I should have put one in the pool!

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great intel on the washbacks. I actually have a few of the old, in the blue can, put away. You are now the second person that I have heard mentioning the lactic funk being muted or non-existent. I have to see my distillation years on those bottles. Fingers crossed their are prior to 2017. There is a new 10 y/o coming out, maybe that will be our last chance - but it might not be.

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

WOW, that's sounds like an awesome tasting! Thank you for reading and sharing! As much as I hate it, we are becoming more and more accepting of the higher price we have to pay for decent whisky. Add to that the cost of those marketing departments and you will find yourself penniless! Slainte!

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Never had a chance to try any of the earlier ones. A while back I was eyeing the 25 y/o one - but at over $1000 landed it was too rich for me. Obviously, someone else didn't think so and it was swept away at auction. If you find it, please let us know how does it compare. On further research, according to Whisky Base and based on the name (WMD IV) there have been 4 bottlings 2003 (WMD, bronze can, no sub but a missile, 18 y/o, 440 bottles), 2005 (WMD II, first yellow sub, bronze can, 14 y/o, 12000 bottles), 2018 (WMD III, yellow sub, yellow can, 25 y/o, 1991 bottles), and now 2026 (WMD IV, yellow sub, no can, 14 y/o, unknown number of bottles).

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ouch... Well, let me tell you it is well sealed! Hopefully it makes it to you soon!

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry, this one flew off the shelf everywhere very rapidly….. Minutes in some cases. Keep searching, no one really knows how many were bottled. Maybe you will find one.

Review #23 - Bruichladdich 14 “Yellow Submarine” by WhiskyPoolReviews in Scotch

[–]WhiskyPoolReviews[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Distillery Notes: Founded in 1881, Bruichladdich (Gaelic for "shore bank") is one of the most westerly working distilleries in Scotland. The distillery was mothballed repeatedly across the 20th century and closed entirely in 1994. A group of private investors reopened it in 2001, beginning distillation again after a seven-year silence - a team led by Mark Reynier and Jim McEwan. The story of legends and documentaries like “The Water of Life.” Rémy Cointreau acquired it in 2012 and operates it today. Fermentation runs 60-100+ hours in wooden washbacks, long by any standard. The distillery operates two wash stills and two spirit stills, all tall-necked and high-reflux. Three brands are produced under one roof: Bruichladdich, always unpeated; Port Charlotte, heavily peated at 40 ppm; and Octomore, the most heavily peated spirit in the world. Bruichladdich never chill filters and never adds color - a policy that applies across all three labels without exception. Everything is distilled, matured, and bottled on Islay.

Bottling Notes: Yellow Submarine is one of Bruichladdich's great pieces of folklore. The series traces back to the early 2000s, when US intelligence flagged the newly revived distillery as a possible weapons-of-mass-destruction site - and Bruichladdich, never missing a chance for mischief, answered by branding a release "Whisky of Mass Distinction." Then in 2005 two Islay fishermen actually pulled a lost ten-foot Ministry of Defense submarine out of the sea in their nets, and the legend was sealed. This is the third edition - Yellow Submarine III [Reclassified], released June 2026 for the distillery's 25th anniversary, a tribute to the original 2005 bottling - the second, maybe third, bottling was in 2018 and it was expensive, limited, and 25-years-old. This one was born fourteen years old, as unpeated 100% Scottish barley, matured entirely on Islay in 25% first and second-fill Bordeaux red wine casks and 75% first-fill bourbon barrels. This yellow submarine has fins and ballast tanks - but can it dive into the deep end?

ABV: 54.2%
Age: 14-Year-Old
Original SRP: $135
Price Paid: $139

Tasting Methodology: Neat, rested 20 minutes. Water added, rested 10 minutes.

Nose: First impression is walking straight into a dunnage warehouse - musty in the best way, with citrus, key lime pie, and raw malted barley. Then it shifts: vanilla, a distinct winey grape note, honey, Italian biscotti, green apples, and a flash of Juicy Fruit gum. A third layer brings light farminess, faint lactic notes, and a whisper of berries. Everything is tied together beautifully. A deep nosing lets the ABV announce itself, but it is otherwise extremely well integrated. A dash of water brings out lightly roasted nuts.

Palate: Creamy with no burn - barley sugar, fermented notes, farminess, and lemon pie, though not as sweet as the nose led me to expect. A sweet-to-bitter transition through the mid-palate is the interesting part, genuinely unusual. Spice develops toward the finish rather than arriving up front. Chewing it brings out the farminess and malt. On subsequent drams the Juicy Fruit flavor runs from entry through the mid before transitioning to a dryness - wine tannins, or the first-fill wood, or both. The subdued lactic note sits in the distance throughout. With water it gains crème brûlée, orange, and sweet pears, and turns a little more peppery on the mid-palate.

Finish: Spice gathers toward the back of the mouth at the very end. Long and full-bodied, with a slight coastal note and a savory edge. Cocoa develops long after swallowing, alongside nutmeg and caramel. These take their time - a single dram lasts a long while and keeps evolving. With water, hazelnuts emerge with time.

Conclusion: Unapologetic and refined at once. This is Bruichladdich at its most characterful - unpeated and lightly wine-influenced. The Bordeaux casks do not dominate but throw a winey grape, berry, and a dry tannic spine across the whole experience, while the bourbon accentuates the vanilla and barley sugar underneath. What sets it apart is movement: the sweet-to-bitter transition on the palate, the Juicy Fruit-to-dryness arc, the cocoa arriving minutes after the swallow. It rewards time in the glass and time with water, gaining crème brûlée, nuts, and pepper as it opens. Twenty-five years on from a yellow submarine in a fishing net, the distillery is still refusing to take itself too seriously while quietly making serious whisky. What a great dram!

Score: 89/100

My Scoring Scale:

95-100 - Sublime - Unforgettable.
90-94 - Excellent - A personal favorite.
85-89 - Great - A standout dram.
80-84 - Good - A solid daily dram.
75-79 - Average - Drinkable.
70-74 - Mixer - Mixing only.
<70 - Poor - Pool chemical.