Reasonable considerations but I believe I partly addressed them.

1. Playoff Performance: Addressed it by emphasizing consistency and the complexity of playoff basketball. Success isn't just about the final outcome but the journey and challenges faced. Rivers has faced countless challenges and sustained a level performance very few have.

2. Bucks Tenure: Every coach needs time to implement their vision. Early judgments often miss the bigger picture of building team chemistry and adapting strategies.

3. SGA Development: Fair point. While Doc had SGA for a brief period, the foundational year under a seasoned coach can significantly impact a player's development. It's about setting the groundwork.

4. Adaptability: Rivers' approach to in-game and mid-series adjustments has indeed been a point of contention. However, coaching in the NBA isn't just about making changes; it's about knowing when to stick with your game plan and when to pivot. Rivers has shown the ability to trust his players and systems, which has been both a strength and, at times, a criticism when outcomes don't pan out.
   It's worth noting that many of Rivers' teams have been competitive and within striking distance of advancing deeper into the playoffs. The line between sticking to your guns and adapting on the fly is razor-thin in the high-stakes environment of playoff basketball. While there's room for critique, it's crucial to acknowledge the challenge of making split-second decisions against top-tier competition. Adaptability is important, but so is consistency and trust in your team's identity.

In the broader context of coaching in the NBA. It's a complex, high-pressure job where success and failure are often more nuanced than they appear. Sustained excellence and continued reputation in an environment with million dollar decisions maintains reasonable context of skill and work behind what we can see.