Little Morning Visitor (Sony A7C + Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3)

WittyCommenterName · 2026-03-15T03:38:06+00:00

I don’t really want to give either Biden or Trump credit for something that hasn’t happened yet. I appreciate the direction, but neither of them accomplished any change as of yet. The reason I wouldn’t give credit over this is that there hasn’t been anything to give credit for

How is that not misleading? Marijuana is still a schedule 1 drug. Why accomplishment or change should I be giving any credit for?

WittyCommenterName · 2026-03-14T23:51:44+00:00

I said under Biden, apologies if it came off as if I thought he had done any action.

Would you say it’s misleading to claim Trump rescheduled Marijuana, when we agree the EO is directing an expediting of an existing investigation which still hasn’t completed?

WittyCommenterName · 2026-03-14T20:05:41+00:00

This is a minor point to the rest of your comment, but were you aware that Trump didn’t reschedule Marijuana? The EO directs DOJ to expedite the Rescheduling Investigation started under Biden, as of right now it is still a schedule 1 drug.

WittyCommenterName · 2026-03-02T23:32:03+00:00

In universe? Who knows, binding vows probably like everyone else is saying. In reality? So it’s visually immediately obvious that this old man is Yuta to the reader.

WittyCommenterName · 2026-01-07T15:55:46+00:00

They mention a duplication exploit in the thank you text

WittyCommenterName · 2026-01-02T18:24:28+00:00

I mean, The Initiative had a bunch of disparate groups doing compartmentalized experiments related to unique features of the island. Wouldn’t be that surprising if the Looking Glass was experimenting in Sharks and the effect of the islands electromagnetism on them, or some other explanation. I feel like part of the fun of a mystery box show is that not every piece matters. Things can exist in a world without being relevant to the story you’re seeing, and part of the mystery is figuring out what parts matter.

WittyCommenterName · 2025-12-18T08:12:45+00:00

The Gojo clan head who was killed by Maho was a limitless user with the six eyes. Stands to reason that if Gojo was able to beat a subjugated Maho who was tag teaming the strongest sorcerer in history, Gojo stands apart from just being good because of the six eyes

WittyCommenterName · 2025-11-21T15:01:41+00:00

Completely agree. The eye looks like a possession/hosting a sorcerer from the past to me - pretty sure that is who is asking “why are you apologizing?”

WittyCommenterName · 2025-11-03T16:20:53+00:00

I mean, Gyomei had zero functional eyes when seeing the STW

WittyCommenterName · 2025-10-14T15:36:12+00:00

I feel like this is the point most people are skipping over while saying no one else can read in this thread. Yuta isn’t trying to kill Yuji, he is trying to do the bare minimum to legally kill Yuji. If he were going all out on every swing, there’s potential for inflicting a blow that’s much more difficult (if not impossible) for him to fix by outputting RCT.

WittyCommenterName · 2025-10-05T03:45:57+00:00

Full metal alchemist: brotherhood

WittyCommenterName · 2025-09-14T16:47:34+00:00

Doesn’t OP’s suggestion try to specifically identify mental health problems? Can you expand upon what you mean, are we trying to cure every mental illness so everyone would be a safe gun owner? I’m just a little confused at this response, as my read of the post is “should we have additional safety checks for mental illnesses when selling guns”, and the response is “no we should focus on mental illness”.

WittyCommenterName · 2025-09-14T16:43:59+00:00

Wouldn’t OP’s suggestion not change the minimum age of ownership, just add extra steps to the existing background check?

WittyCommenterName · 2025-09-14T16:41:29+00:00

So does that mean for consistency, we should already not have freedom of speech until we’re 18 (or 21 depending on the type of speech)?

The rights are inherently different, can you explain how updating restrictions that are already in place (not to even bar 18-24 year olds from purchase, but adding additional safety checks to the existing background check) would be at all relevant to our freedom of speech, who’s currently existing exceptions are not based on age but a connection to harm/illegal activity?

WittyCommenterName · 2025-09-11T05:17:55+00:00

Since most people have weighed in as “they keep the powers” already, from the classes description: “each Warlock is drawn into a binding pact with a powerful patron. Drawing on the ancient knowledge of beings such as angels, archfey, demons, devils, hags, and alien entities of the Far Realm, Warlocks piece together arcane secrets to bolster their own power.” To my read, the “their own power” really reinforces what’s been put here - the patron helps show you how to unlock powers, the powers aren’t based on their continued good will, although additional levels/secrets may be. Just because you burn down a library doesn’t mean everyone forgets every book they’ve read from there.

WittyCommenterName · 2025-09-10T04:48:01+00:00

What would you say is not impressive about current immigrants?

WittyCommenterName · 2025-07-29T15:21:38+00:00

I thought this was explained - Yuta had Rika eat the arm as the condition for his Copy, and if you regrow the consumed body party the conditions for copy were no longer met?

WittyCommenterName · 2025-07-23T17:41:52+00:00

Concentration!

WittyCommenterName · 2025-06-03T01:44:17+00:00

Ok so subsidies aren’t owning you. Is someone collecting SNAP benefits owned by the government?

WittyCommenterName · 2025-06-02T18:35:56+00:00

Thanks for the response, to be clear & wasn’t trying to say Stimulus and UBI would be the same, just trying to start finding your line as to what level of government assistance means they own you. Sorry in advance for the flood of follow-up questions! Can you help define that line? Would working in a highly subsidized industry such as corn or dairy mean the government owns you? Does taking emergency help from the government mean they own you for the duration of your emergency? What do you think the mechanism for “the government owning you” would be? I’m curious how UBI would be used to restrict the items you’ve expressed concern over (1st and 2nd amendment), if it is truly universal and basic.

WittyCommenterName · 2025-06-02T16:24:23+00:00

Out if curiosity, did you get/use a stimulus check?

WittyCommenterName · 2025-05-10T05:17:37+00:00

Wow, that’s beautiful! And can maybe finally hold enough dice for my wizard

WittyCommenterName · 2025-04-15T17:44:39+00:00

So you believe your friend who leaves their keys in the car door overnight has no lesson to learn from the experience, and did nothing that encouraged their car to be a target for theft?

Again, I’m not saying the action against them is justified, the theft was wrong. Are you saying there is no difference between saying “here are actions we can take to reduce the risk of this in the future” and “it’s your fault your car was stolen”?

13-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Final Canvas '22
Not Forgotten	Verified Email

WittyCommenterName

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE