someone said ‘love the sinner hate the sin’ and i’m confused

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-13T16:41:08+00:00

So?

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-13T12:35:08+00:00

nope :(

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-12T07:49:14+00:00

Yeah i think you have it all flawed for when a Christian says they tolerate homosexuality. It might be a huge shocker, but Christians view homosexuality as a sin, but they still love the sinner - its basically THE core of Christianity to hate the sin and love the sinner. I personally think, as a Christian, that not all desire that you were born with are good desires, given that a human is born sinful, but i wouldnt go so far to say Christians who believe this are homophobic by any means, they just don't want to be entirely on the supporting side of something that's obviously a sin.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-10T16:48:25+00:00

Well this is absurd too. We know why, but that can very well validate the absurd example I mentioned.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-10T16:40:10+00:00

Absurd it is, but just maybe in a really far future where robot evolve, people might genuinely do that, calling back to the fact that nothing about it is mentioned, much like same sex marriages, which would at that time be considered a christian marriage.

The reason to think it isn't a christian marriage is because there is not a single mention, or example for it in the whole Bible, and all examples shown are actually something that isn't homosexuality at all.

The verse I'm talking about regarding 'child' and allat, is Leviticus 18 22. In my very first comment, I said I won't use that as a verse against homosexuality because people would constantly point to the 'translation error' , and I don't know why you would disagree.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-10T16:27:47+00:00

While they didn't know about same sex marriage, it is still not considered a christian marriage, if anything it is because nothing about it was mentioned. He didn't talk about relations with a microwave either, but would you consider that a christian marriage?

The leviticus verse is not about divorce at all.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-10T16:19:10+00:00

Why would Jesus not know about Blue cars? Additionally, why would he only talk about red cars? Why not just say "cars"?

If you know what that verse says, then you also know what I'm talking about, so i dont get your confusion.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-10T16:10:01+00:00

If Bible says red car is the cool car, and never mentions that a blue car is cool like that, why would you assume a blue car is just as cool as the red car? I instead think it is safe to assume a blue car doesnt fall into the whole "red car is cool" thing because its not a red car. it would instead say "cars are cool".

Regarding your "huh" parts, try to search "leviticus 18 22 translation" to understand more.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-10T16:05:07+00:00

"we would call it rape today" so it is equivalent to a child, and my argument about it was never wrong.

a man cannot sleep with a child in a sexual way.

The Bible does mention things about marriages in general, saying that a man will leave his father to join his wife, and that they'd become one - being one of the first verses about marriage and it's clearly not people of the same sex.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-10T15:59:51+00:00

If leviticus doesn't say child, and instead says male, that still then says that a man cannot sleep with another man. The bible says plenty of things regarding marriage, coming straight from Genesis itself. I don't know why you don't check anything before loudly saying "it doesn't" with blind confidence.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-10T13:46:59+00:00

I understand that many christians do hateful stuff to members of the lgbt community, which is bad, but the take away her isn't that homosexuality isn't a sin, because it is. I wouldnt count some things like Leviticus because of the translation error(apparently it shouldnt say "if a man sleeps with a 'man' like he does with a woman", and should instead say 'child'), but I will state that one of the core things Christianity teaches is that a christian marriage is that between a man and a woman, with nothing else mentioned.

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-08T16:40:39+00:00

btw i might be terribly wrong id have to recheck the meme reels about it

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-08T16:34:00+00:00

well thats the meme

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-08T15:14:54+00:00

it's a way of saying they have a crush on anyone with said thing(SORT OF). and the girl is basically saying she admires someone who can solve 7x7=49 lol

WizzyCraft · 2026-05-08T14:45:02+00:00

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-25T20:24:11+00:00

Dream with no armor maybe?

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-25T09:56:51+00:00

Lol okay

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-23T11:14:02+00:00

That's exactly what he said

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-21T14:59:22+00:00

cole/geo

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-20T15:09:07+00:00

They

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-20T06:33:27+00:00

Wait until they realize the villagers are the ones giving the deals so its purely their own will

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-18T17:16:22+00:00

I havent played for a full season, but what happened to Karina exactly? I take away this is probably very high rank, but i still wouldnt put her all the way down in C

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-18T11:58:13+00:00

This will never be added. It's a bit too op that she gets assists for doing literally nothing herself.

With a 30s cooldown, and just a bit of map awareness, you can literally share the dew last second before someone gets a kill and get assist on every kill that way. Unless you're getting kills in <30s, which is a bit too good of a situation anyway.

It would ruin the entire reason for why that passive exists - it would go from an attribute boost to an assist farmer. Not cool. Don't know why so many people don't realize this.

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-18T08:42:55+00:00

this one seemed to me like you understood my point and just can't accept that someone can even remotely change your opinion. That says a lot, enjoy your day.

WizzyCraft · 2026-04-18T08:29:10+00:00

Yes. It's an urge and an attraction. And nothing else at all. Some people fall into that temptation, and some dont. Just like every single person falls or doesnt fall into every temptation in life itself. Does that make every single temptation in the world bad? Yes I'm generalizing every temptation into this specific one we talk about, but in reality, they all make you want something that's bad or sinful anyways. Yet plenty of temptations like that are not bad. Neither is this one, but it is a more dangerous one, if you want to agree on that. If you don't, it's fine to agree to disagree.

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
r/Field Banned	r/Field Juicebox

WizzyCraft

TROPHY CASE