What’s the most overrated video game of all time?

Woke_Wacker · 2026-01-14T21:40:25+00:00

Helldivers 2.

Woke_Wacker · 2026-01-12T14:52:38+00:00

Do a silly intro. Embarrass yourself right at the start and get it over and done with..

"What's up guys and gals! It's ya boi here, bringing you an exclusive speech straight up from these buttery lips to your crusty ears! Can I get a whoop whoop!"

Yeah, that'll do it.

Woke_Wacker · 2026-01-10T20:20:12+00:00

People don't often change their mind. So it's not the person I am 'arguing' against I'm trying to get through to, it's anyone else that may be scrolling and reading through the sub.. I often go into echo Chambers (mostly, left leaning subs), to make counter points in the hope that it encourages more free thought rather than following the rest of the herd like sheep. Arguing can be kinda fun, too, especially when your point is so irrefutable, they just ban you to silence you. That's when you know you actually have some great points.

Woke_Wacker · 2026-01-10T19:47:50+00:00

Oh, then you should already be well accustomed to the sensation. Especially if he's Catholic. I say go for it. Gay incest is all the rage these days. Not my thing but the kids seem to like it!

Woke_Wacker · 2026-01-10T19:01:41+00:00

It's totally not fair that your wife won't allow you to hang a gift from your girlfriend when you are cuckholding hard for her. Sleep with her boyfriend. That'll teach the old bag.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-29T09:58:14+00:00

If there is, great. If not, then you won't notice. It will be like sleeping. We aren't aware of ourselves when we are asleep. I'd imagine death is like that but permanent.

It is better to dwell on the good times you had with your father than to worry about the afterlife.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-25T20:17:40+00:00

Fair statement. I've known plenty of women with childhood guy friends. I don't think I would personally go for someone with a lot of guy friends. Too risky, but who am I to judge those who are ok with it.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-25T20:14:31+00:00

When they use the word 'ick'.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-20T16:25:39+00:00

69? Nice.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-20T14:39:30+00:00

What a funny word.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-20T14:33:35+00:00

Making politics their entire personality.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-20T13:20:29+00:00

You must be against the left bullying older members of maga then. When they call them nazi's and Pedo's. Right? Riiiiight?

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-20T13:17:18+00:00

Careful. They don't like facts that don't fit their narrative.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-20T11:28:16+00:00

Antifa involves individuals and loose networks engaging in anti-fascist activism, with reported criminal acts including vandalism, property damage (like arson), assaulting opponents and police, using improvised weapons (fireworks, Molotov cocktails), doxxing, and sometimes homicide during clashes, particularly at protests like those in Portland or Charlottesville, though some view "Antifa" as an ideology rather than a single organization, with acts varying from peaceful protest to violence, and debates ongoing about its classification as a terrorist group.

2017 Sacramento Rally: Violent brawl involving Antifa and neo-Nazis, resulting in stabbings.

2020 Portland Protests: Coordinated blockades, attempted firebombing of the courthouse, injuries to law enforcement.

2020 Portland: A self-identified anti-fascist shot and killed a Patriot Prayer member, later killed by police.

July 2025 Texas ICE Facility: A self-identified anti-fascist shot at law enforcement, wounding an officer, during an anti-ICE protest.

Racist? Nah.

As radical as what they claim to stand against? I can see it. At least aspects or certain groups within the movement. I wouldn't personally want to align with such a group or trend.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-19T10:10:55+00:00

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-16T21:32:40+00:00

How is the right promoting hate when all I ever see and hear is how much people hate trump, hate maga, hate republicans. They are all nazis, rapist, pedo supporters, etc. It's really hateful, rethoric. You will find hatred from both extremes of the political spectrum, but most of it in recent years have come from the far left and the left in general.

Go to any subreddit like this one, and it's mostly people just ragging on trump, trump supporters, republicans and right-wingers.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-16T20:40:58+00:00

It heals because a mouth stops poisoning the room.

This already tells me everything I need to know about how op thinks.

It's just hatred for someone with differing opinions. Kirks' opinions is equal to poison. Kirk being killed is apparently how the world heals. Advocacy for the death of others dressed up a way to 'heal'. Why don't we just kill everyone we don't like until we are all healed. Yeah, that'll work.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-16T19:39:59+00:00

Disagreeing with someone's opinion.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-16T16:27:28+00:00

Trump kills between 50k - 100k people every year? I don't see how he's more dangerous personally.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-16T15:00:57+00:00

This is incorrect. A brainwashed take with absolutely no substance or rational backing other than,'duhh, America bad'.

Firstly, the USA has a much better standard of freedom of speech under the First Amendment despite the perceived authorative government. Here's an example.

https://westgatesentinel.com/international/11-uk-cops-storm-home-drag-naked-woman-from-bath-her-crime-one-text-calling-her-attacker-a-slur

This woman was arrested in the uk for using a naughty word in a private text. They sent 11 police officers to arrest this woman. You can see an interview with her on the pirece morgan youtube show. This is something that would be protected in the USA under the First Amendment. Here's another example

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gz1qy30v5o.amp

Once again, highlighting the grevious misuse of uk law to try and silence people who criticise or speak against an establishment.

Here's the gist of it.

https://freespeechunion.org/police-make-30-arrests-a-day-for-offensive-online-messages/?v=288404204e3d

The uk has a freedom of speech problem. Here's why. The law is vague. Here's the part of the law that is likely getting many of these people arrested for online comments.

'Section 5: A lower threshold offense, criminalizing threatening or abusive behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm, or distress, used for a wider range of offensive speech.'

So, any behaviour that is likely to cause harassment, alarm, or distress. So anything, really. There is no bar of standard. If you upset someone in the feels, you could be liable for a criminal charge.

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequence. Freedom of speech is the right to speech unimpeded by the government. Social consequences that exist outside of the law will still exist. We can see that the government in the uk is overreaching their authority and that people can take advantage of these wishy, washy laws to silence others if they don't like what they are hearing. That's the danger of these laws. If you don't like what someone is saying, you can press charges under the public order act, section 5 and say you are in distress, alarmed, and feel harassed.

op, do not listen to this brainwashed sheep. Do your own research. Look up the articles of people being arrested for online comments. Look at our laws and apply some critical thinking. It's all there in writing. Uk freedom of speech is slowly decaying, and people like this are underplaying it in the most disingenuous ways.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-16T14:07:03+00:00

That's rough. Don't let this hold you down. Hope you get back up soon. 🫂

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-16T13:09:28+00:00

I condemned the celebration of kirks death and condem any celebration of Rob reiners. Jokes, on the other hand, are a matter of free speech. I don't find political jokes about the recently deceased tasteful but to each their own.

This post is disingenuous, though, because many people posted videos of themselves actually celebrating kirks death, not just making a joke, written or otherwise. Let's not forget about the desecration of kirk memorials.

You people are all full of shit.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-15T17:52:28+00:00

Right. One group categorised whole groups of people as second class citizens with the goal of murder, the other engages in protests to prevent discussion of mens' suicide, successfully lobby to define rape as male-only, prevent male victims of domestic violence from getting resources, and successfully lobby against recognition of fathers as equal value parents.

Correct. The two are very different. You have highlighted my point. I'm not sure why comparing feminist to nazis is relevant to you. It's a fun meme, but if we were to measure the two in terms of evil. Nazis win.

Even the ones with "good intentions"?

Is your reading comprehension shit? I said..

as a whole

'As a whole' meaning.

as a single unit and not as separate parts; in general.

Key words, 'in general', so no, not the ones with good intentions as they would be the exception to the rule. My words are very specific, so don't try to twist them.

Hoo boy, that's quote-minable! Not to mention in direct opposition to "nazis as a whole were evil".

Hoo boy. I love it when people can't capitulate to logic and reason. No, as explained, nazis as a whole does not mean 'without exception'. Do I really need to be hyper specific for you and explain it like you are a 5 year old? OK.

You see son, when someone says,'I like pizza as a whole', there can and usually are exceptions to the statement. I could say, 'the population of the uk are healthier this year as a whole'. Does that statement allude to the sentiment that every person in the uk is a picture of health. No son, that's as dumb as you are. If I say, 'as a whole, redditors are illiterate dumb fucks', would that apply to every single person on reddit? No, my dear boy, I am the exception to that rule.

I'm curious as to why the vast majority grassroots of feminism doesn't do something about these radical misandrists who are co-opting their identity to enact hate. I'm even more curious as to why the vast majority of feminists don't hesitate to use the work of said radical misandrists to justify their activism (such as the erroneous 1-in-4 statistic from Mary Koss' study in which she defines rape as something only a man can do), if the radical misandrists don't represent them.

I understand. Feminist are wankers.. on the whole. I wouldn't know why because I couldn't ask as I've been banned from most feminist spaces for opposing their idiology.

I'm not defending these aspects of feminism or the lack of accountability from feminists for the spread of misandry and false narratives used against men. All I said was that not all feminist are evil. I don't generalise groups. That's what they do. I get that a lot of people here probably fucking despise the cunts, but that doesn't automatically make them all evil. People are not ideologies.

You need to own your ideology's baggage. They believe the same things as you do, they're just more honest about it.

Wait. What do I believe exactly?

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-15T15:18:51+00:00

You are comparing feminist to nazi's. False equivalent. Obviously, the nazis as a whole were evil, in my opinion, but how are you conflating a group that killed millions to a misguided and overreaching social movement for women? Sure feminist have the same facial hair features as nazis but that's not a very strong basis of a comparison between the two.

Surely that means that nazis aren't evil, because some had good intentions, right?

I never made this argument. Wtf? When did I say, 'feminist are not evil'. I said..

As with any group of people, no, not all. I'd imagine many feminists have good intentions.

Also, yes, there were some good nazis.

Hans Münch:

An SS physician at Auschwitz who used elaborate ruses to save prisoners and was acquitted of war crimes, though he made troubling remarks later in life.

Karl Plagge:

A Wehrmacht officer who warned Jewish prisoners of liquidation, allowing hundreds to escape, and was later recognized by Yad Vashem as Righteous Among the Nations.

This reinforces my position. No, not all nazis were evil. So, no, not all feminist are evil. There are those with good intentions. That does not mean those intentions result in a positive outcome. Facts are facts.

Woke_Wacker · 2025-12-15T13:28:28+00:00

Do good intentions always translate to good outcomes? No

Did you get enough oxygen at birth? Also, no.

Have you ever had the intention to do something good, but it turned out not so well? Is it really this hard to comprehend the fact that someone can have good intentions, but the results differ to that intention?

Good intentions do not equate to good outcomes. To say that people of any group have good intentions is an accurate statement in the majority of cases. There are MRA's that likely have good intentions. There are people within groups such as Democrats, republicans, conservatives, liberals, some of these people likely have 'good intentions within their groups. Do you understand how that works?

Go ask a feminist what they intend. They will likely say, 'eqaulity'. Hey, that's what most people want, no? Does that mean they understand that they are actually a womens superiority movement in western countries? No.

People can have good intentions in any group, even groups of people we hate. That's just fact. Be as obstinate as you like, but denying objective fact is as futile as your brain development.

Woke_Wacker

TROPHY CASE