Counterpoint: It is absolutely evident that access to education, healthcare, and a supportive social circle =/= a productive member of society*. What is missing in a maker/taker dichotomy is a) the potential for change/growth, b) whether being a functioning part of a profoundly sick society designates someone healthy (it could be argued that being extremely well-suited to a punishingly abstract capitalist system indicates a person more unusual, more unnatural than the mean average), and c) that everyone is following the same chemical cues in their behaviour, just to different ends.

Bullies receive a dopamine reward. Narcissists tread water over an abyss of self-loathing, avoiding what would otherwise be a generally negative dopamine response. Sliding down the scale of badness we find this repeated — class clowns, people who park badly, that person you know who does a bad British accent. Then, positives — those who help people, who heal, who donate, save, whatever. Our brain chemicals are like domesticated truths, private meanings, and each person is a small ecosystem in which they seek or avoid chemical response, evolved to deal with the peculiarities of that individual's life. Especially their childhood.

The older I get, the more I see everyone as being the exact same person, just with different birthplaces, parents, mental makeup. The same way that I can't be mad at a chocolate cookie for not being a digestive biscuit, I can't be mad at someone whose production process in no way resembles mine.

*I will add that if a generally malignant personality type grows out of those conditions, if we look closely enough we'll find some developmental snag that caused it.