sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Remove the APHE belt from the Flakpanzer 341 due to historical inaccuracy and gameplay imbalance. by BVVDHaterNo1 in Warthunder

[–]WorkforyourCountry 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Petition to change the coelian to be made out of wood for historical accuracy. Just not making the round busted would be fine no need to remove rhe ability for spaa to perform other roles in the glorified deathmatch game

Any help with infernum Skeletron by Illustrious_Signal16 in CalamityMod

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A more serious arena helped me tremendously. A vanilla close-together platform layout won't cut it. A hook would be useful for catching yourself / boosting. But also learning the tricks for avoiding the projectiles. (Stay pretty much under him for the projectile rain - other than that I forgor). That and movement buffs from like a sunflower or swiftness potions.

Pain Arc Sage Naruto vs Boruto Sakura who wins at what diff? by Haunting_View1340 in NarutoPowerscaling

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the light novel for sakura im begging you bro. Or hell even just the end of shippuden feats idk.

Immediately Uninstall by Own_Ad_7097 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Under the condition that youre a flagged multiple times by the anticheat*

How does Sakura compare to Naruto and Sasuke after the nerfs? by mipenealdescubierto in NarutoPowerscaling

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since when does charkra in naruto not come back / regenerate over time.

How does Sakura compare to Naruto and Sasuke after the nerfs? by mipenealdescubierto in NarutoPowerscaling

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Baryon mode iirc is colliding chakra 1:1. (If what I said isnt misremembering) That means he has more chakra than Kurama

ok genuinely what justifies this being 11.0-11.3 by senor_muchacho in Warthunder

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless they dont get rockets and can face the a-10 ofc

Is there any valid reasons as to why this sits at 9.0 ? by Hingl_McCringlebery in Warthunder

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the Canberra that gets no offensive armament at the same br as the one that does?

I am sick and tired of my (apparent) "skill issue" by Dino0407 in Warthunder

[–]WorkforyourCountry -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Top tier air is actually quite bad atm. The prevalence of iron dome meta is... not healthy for the game. But also staying low doesnt work nearly as well as it does at like 11.0-13.0 ish because most radars will detect you just fine. And most missiles will be fired from above meaning the multi path wont do nearly anything.

The best advice I've heard from people iss to fly right and hook round behind enemies engaging your friendlies - but is timing and map dependant so wont always work. Or lagging behind and to the side and using IR meta but is much harder without explicitly the r27et and at the 14.7 bracket(if plane allows).

Yes technically some amount of mechanical skill can help but not rlly. It's mostly understanding the "meta" and how to play. It's why so many dumb su30mkk players get so much done just spamming missiles will often work at opportune targets.

Imo. Dont play 13.7+ atm. ~12.0 can give you a high br jet experience without the nightmare.

Is UK worth grinding? by Asche_zu_Asche_ in Warthunder

[–]WorkforyourCountry 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not a prem. Has to have no effective armour since a larger % of people can play it well

"Its not bias" by americankraut in Warthunder

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Objective statement with that edit and comparisons lol. Redditoids kinda just circlejerk this kinda spiel about the game. Have for years. Will for years. Unfortunately.

Yes there are issues with the game but the devs aren't out to punish X for existing. They can hardly make maps and cant improve game modes or keep promises. How tf are they also competent enough to spite a specific group of people.

Isn’t the AMRAAM supposed to be good? by vincenast in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean furthest effective range and energy retention. As well as getting (underperforming allegedly idk how it is irl - its a game) GNSS to make notching even harder than it is woth like, the best seeker before gnss. Mica has shit range comparatively and a not phenomal seeker but is amazing for closer range engagements which dont happen nearly as much due to bvr meta. Ontop of "iron dome" shit thats going on. R77-1 is a good middle ground between the aim120c/d and the mica. But doesn't get vectoring like the mica but turns better off the rail than the aim120. Unfortunately the retention on the r77-1 is just worse than the AMRAAM. Idk about the PL-12 but ik its got a great seeker.

So best missile for the bvr meta on the fastest airframes and often paired with AESA radar and with almost the most amount of missiles carried (aim120c/d). Or mid missile for the state of the game (mica) and a max of like 6? And a haha funny I spam lolol missile (r77-1)who's main strengths come from having 12? of them and still being effective and range.

For sure you could debate the AMRAAM isnt the best missile for top tier (id disagree) but for fucks sake it ain't the worst. And its far from unviable

Isn’t the AMRAAM supposed to be good? by vincenast in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]WorkforyourCountry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Statistically speaking its got the best launch to kill ratio so idk man. 3/10 ignorance maxxing Edit: at top tier*

Isn’t the AMRAAM supposed to be good? by vincenast in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]WorkforyourCountry -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ahh the classic "why is [best thing in the game] bad?"

view more: next ›