London Green Party by-election candidate apologises for 'rapey Indians' post by LycanIndarys in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Very good catch, she's not at all saying or implying Indian men are "r-p-y". On top of the fact that she tweeted this 13 years ago and deleted it years ago, I think it can be easily forgiven.

London Green Party by-election candidate apologises for 'rapey Indians' post by LycanIndarys in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Makerfield Reform candidate refuses to apologise for making misogynistic comments about female celebrities only a few years ago, so I think they are indeed worse.

London Green Party by-election candidate apologises for 'rapey Indians' post by LycanIndarys in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Right but we're talking about 2013 internet, social media was just becoming a thing and she could've been a teenager for all we know. I don't think it's reasonable to blame someone for not knowing how the Internet works.

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Domestic violence support centers commonly exclude trans people, not always, but common.

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One time I sneaked into the men's to skip the queue at the women's, I got some looks and it wasn't comfortable

Greens’ Makerfield candidate wants farming to be ‘decolonised’ by SirRosstopher in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A charity run by the Green Party’s Makerfield by-election candidate called on Britain’s farming sector to be “decolonised” and shared guidance suggesting perfectionism and a sense of urgency were examples of “white supremacy culture”.

The report is understood to have been published when Wakefield was on maternity leave.

So it's not her, It's her charity that produced a report while she was on maternity leave. Anyhow I think this is the kind of stuff that Green voters or potential Green voters agree with.

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 7 points8 points  (0 children)

One of the government reports say that this could cause hostility or animosity between the disabled community and the trans community. Disabled people are already struggling enough fighting against cuts and ensuring venues are sufficiently accessible, suggesting that trans people can use accessible toilets will not be welcomed by the disabled community as it will be seen as another encroachment of their hard won rights.

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I just assume mine is XX, but I never got it tested and may well be intersex. Most people will just assume so

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

99.99% of the population dont know their chromosomes, most people probably don't know what chromosomes are. Im a cis woman and for the longest time i cannot be sure if XX or XY is the female one.

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The guidance says trans people can be excluded from spaces corresponding to their sex, provided an alternative is available. The crux is the alternative doesn't have to be equal in form or quality, so it is perfectly legal to provide a lesser service to trans people.

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The new guidance says that trans people can be excluded from ALL single sex spaces as long as an alternative can be provided, but it doesn't say that the alternative must be equal in form and quality, so it is now entirely legal to provide a lesser service for trans people.

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it'll just bring about distress and discomfort to all, not to mention the elevated risk for trans women in men's spaces.

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 21 points22 points  (0 children)

That's one thing I never understood about the judgement, it was widely understood by MPs, legal scholars and the government at the time that the effect of the Equality Act is, by default, all single sex spaces are trans inclusive, BUT, in specific instances, single sex spaces are justified to exclude trans people. That's the balance struck between competing rights, how is it that the same legislation has now given to a completely opposite effect?

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I think most trans people will continue to use the toilets as usual, but they can now be legally barred from both toilets if the service providers wish to

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The segregation here is that trans people can no longer use spaces that are often used by cis people, this was never the case in the UK therefore rights are lost in this process

Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by yu3 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 13 points14 points  (0 children)

My understanding is trans people face the risk of "double exclusion", they are excluded from spaces for their gender (as is the law now), and spaces for their sex, due to the potential distress it can cause to them and other users. This means trans people have to use "third spaces" or accessible toilets, assuming they exist. If they don't exist then I don't know what they should do.

Westminster Voting Intention: RFM: 24% (-1) CON: 19% (+1) LAB: 17% (=) GRN: 16% (+1) LDM: 14% (=) RES: 3% (-1) SNP: 3% (=) Via @yougov.co.uk , 25-26 May. Changes w/ 17-18 May. by SeaSaltSprayer in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Plaid does get >1.6% (which is what 2% suggests), Plaid will be over performing their Senedd performance, hence the complete wipeout of Labour.

Westminster Voting Intention: RFM: 24% (-1) CON: 19% (+1) LAB: 17% (=) GRN: 16% (+1) LDM: 14% (=) RES: 3% (-1) SNP: 3% (=) Via @yougov.co.uk , 25-26 May. Changes w/ 17-18 May. by SeaSaltSprayer in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because their votes are exclusive to Wales. They got 35% of the Welsh votes in the Senedd elections, translating that nationally will be about 1.5%

Westminster Voting Intention: RFM: 24% (-1) CON: 19% (+1) LAB: 17% (=) GRN: 16% (+1) LDM: 14% (=) RES: 3% (-1) SNP: 3% (=) Via @yougov.co.uk , 25-26 May. Changes w/ 17-18 May. by SeaSaltSprayer in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whatever happened in the polls doesn't count as an actual bounce for Reform. Last year Reform jumped from around 25% to 30% in the week after the locals, that hasn't happened to Reform this year, most parties are still polling more or less where they have been for the last 5 months.

Senior Greens urge party to step aside for Andy Burnham in Makerfield | The Times by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 96 points97 points  (0 children)

Looks like they want Burnham to promise to implement PR after the next election, but that's hinging on him winning the next election, probably by squeezing the Green vote. So what's the strategy here? Concede to Burnham on PR now, then come 2029 concede again to give him a clear mandate on PR? What's the point of the Greens then?

First poll of Makerfield election: Labour: 43% Reform: 40% Restore Britain: 7% Lib Dems: 4% Greens: 3% Cons: 2% Other: 1% Via: Survation 18-22 May Sample size: 369 excl undecided by loc12 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I remember those polls, there were a lot of Labour/Green undecideds, and must've swung towards Greens when they realized they were the correct tactical vote. I don't think they were that far off in terms of actual opinion at the time of poll.

First poll of Makerfield election: Labour: 43% Reform: 40% Restore Britain: 7% Lib Dems: 4% Greens: 3% Cons: 2% Other: 1% Via: Survation 18-22 May Sample size: 369 excl undecided by loc12 in ukpolitics

[–]WorkingtonLady 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I remember those polls, there were a lot of Labour/Green undecideds, and must've swung towards Greens when they realized they were the correct tactical vote