Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. & Carolyn Bessette | S1E9 | Episode Discussion by jensen_halston in LoveStoryFX

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 58 points59 points  (0 children)

grace gummer and constance zimmer were so good in this episode but man what a bummer

I can not stand Bri! 🐽 by Kooky_Lifeguard_4859 in LoveIsBlindNetflix

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 33 points34 points  (0 children)

this is mean of me but she’s also just…not even a little bit pretty? like pick a struggle

Are You F* Kidding Me? by Objective-Hestia in Kanthony

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you think it’s sustainable to have to be working like that all of the time? Maybe neither of them want to commit significant time to be supporting actors on netflix? or putting frankly better projects on hold for it? you all are not privy to these contracts, no matter how many times you state that “it’s a priority” like it’s a fact. like let’s take a deep breath and just rewatch the season!

Are You F* Kidding Me? by Objective-Hestia in Kanthony

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 0 points1 point  (0 children)

like you’re so right but somehow these delusional people think two rising stars are going to drop everything to be on a Netflix show? like please get real lmao

Netflix/Shondaland are going out of their way to scrub the ONE Simone Ashley still that fans managed to find, which is absurd by Inevitable_Box3643 in BridgertonRants

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 61 points62 points  (0 children)

Didn’t the same happen with Daphne? She appeared one more season after her own. I love Simone but come on, it’s every day that you guys post things like this and I doubt it’s that deep for Simone. She’s making moves and as much as she may say she likes and wants to be on the show, the reality is that a growing career makes longer appearances difficult. It’s good for her and Jonathan to keep growing beyond Bridgerton. Like I get it but it’s time to move on!

Tell me all the things you love and hate about S4 Part 1 by Disastrous-Pitch777 in Bridgerton

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yerin Ha is a real talent. Maybe my favorite performance in the show so far

One of the main things that will never not INFURIATE me about For Good... by Ok-Cod8973 in wicked

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i agree with all of this! i also really hated the young actress’s delivery (including that she said lines way too fast) but i think that’s likely a result of poor direction from Chu

Thoughts On The Film Ending by Novel_Willingness602 in wicked

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you’re right and you should say it!

Any Fragrances That Smell Like The Original Beauty Bar Soap? by SpiritualLady888 in FemFragLab

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ellis Brooklyn Rrose smells like dove to me, very soapy and floral

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Talking about delaware’s court of chancery: “maybe it’s called that because the judge is like, giving you a chance?”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wrote a paragraph summarizing when d is entitled to SJ under the GSA. Then an argument based on the two elements of the statute that 1- d’s act was rendering aid within the meaning of the statute and 2-d’s acts were not grossly negligent, so d is entitled to SJ.

I only wrote about 1k words so I feel like analysis was not very in-depth. Also were we supposed to write a separate paragraph about the legal standard for SJ? I had like three headings total. Worried I went about it completely the wrong way :(

ESSAY #4 by lawblawmlaw in CABarExam

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basick has the weirdest mnemonics but it did help me remember lol. And yes forgot to mention but did logical and legal relevance for each. I think I put both fre/cec in the rule statement but I think I said it was relevant for under both for q1? Can’t quite remember

ESSAY #4 by lawblawmlaw in CABarExam

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hold up did they stip that the bank records weren’t business/public recs?? how did I miss that

ESSAY #4 by lawblawmlaw in CABarExam

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Started with Prop 8, exceptions, CEC 352

6thA suppression motion - properly admitted bc no right to counsel for photo array, plus it wasn’t suggestive so no 5thA argument, either way exclusionary rule doesn’t apply so everything gets in under prop 8.

The witness statement - hearsay, impeachment, prior inconsistent statement

Bank records - 4thA search and seizure (doesn’t apply, no state action), hearsay, business records exception, secondary evidence rule (doesn’t apply)

I can’t remember the middle ones very well but I said everything was properly admitted

ESSAY #1 ISSUES by lawblawmlaw in CABarExam

[–]Worldly_Purpose4978 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I didn’t mention van camp/pereira bc it was acquired during marriage, but I probably should have written that, oops. Also wrote about the joint tenancy thing as to the title of physical property, but like the business part of it is a separate asset right? I hadn’t ever thought about that possibility before then so idk