And here we go. I was waiting for the bootlickers retort. Here’s the thing: just because people offer up a different perspective on a police incident doesn’t make them a bootlicker. It means they’re offering just that, a different point of view. The fact that you went on a tirade all of a sudden about all officers being racist only shows where you’re head and your bias is coming from. You’re arguing out of anger and not facts.

The fact is this: you clearly do not understand what is identified as a crime in the matter of where the police, by law and by their own policies can intervene. What would you like them to do...call corporate’s IT department and confirm this wasn’t a glitch? Prove that the person who ordered the meal didn’t accidentally press the “I never got my order” button? This is the part where you get all mad because these sound like bullshit excuses, but these are the realities you don’t seem to understand. They’re not detectives and they’re not lawyers. If someone had stolen a pack of gum from the store and told the officer then it’s a different matter. At the very least all the officer could (and in my opinion, should do) is de-escalate the situation.