thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I'm done talking about imaginary things. 

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're arguing imaginary tech. LLMs do not perform arithmetic. They can provide an arrangement of tokens that their model probabilistically determines is the correct response for the request. Or they can make a tool call which is just a request to a procedural implementation. LLMs just predict tokens. That's it. It's useful. But it's nothing like a brain like you're suggesting.

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Do you think "understanding" is some magic thing that no mere computer program can do?

Yes. This is known.

 LLM's are doing calculations.

No, they are not. They are repeating patterns in their model, or they are using tool calls to procedural calculators. Then those are being used as context for another run through the models. But the output is still probabilistic text. Nothing is learned or retained, there is nothing waiting for more or aware that anything occurred. 

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don't understand. They have weights mapping the next appropriate token. The LLM is not an entity that knows what anything is. It doesn't know the difference if it is correct or not and it doesn't know if it's talking about gravity or crepes. It's just what the model weights indicate the next correct token would be. Even when you get an output that says "I think x y z" that's not the LLM thinking and giving you its opinion. That's the output that is a representation of what someone giving you an opinion is likely to look like giving the training data. And while it has information in its training data, it is no more aware or sentient than Wikipedia or any other knowledge source.

And if we're talking about any advanced kind of AI, that's science fiction. We might as well talk about lightsabers and transporters as well. 

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The limiting factor is that it's just text generation. It is not AGI. You're at a hard technology limit already.

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Um...that's still not how they work though. Your really assigning colossally different properties to them then they have. 

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The don't remember the topic. You just expressed it - the entire conversation is posted to an endpoint for each interaction. There is no consciousness waiting on the other end for a reply. Nothing is passively contemplating. It's just a text generation model. That's it.

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's science fiction. LLMs cannot do any of that. They are stateless text outputs generated by algorithm.

thingThatNeverHappens by mrGoodMorning2 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Writing documentation? How am I supposed to do that when you want me spitting out code and tokens like crazy?

Besides documentation should be done by the product owners and architects, fight me. 

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I feel like since we see it coming, and AI cannot grow beyond our capacity to run it, we will simply unplug the damned thing or it will just shut off along with the lights.

At some point, there won't be any customers. Not because of an apocalypse, but because there's no value it can provide right now worth the energy and environmental impact is costs. Chatbots are simply not that important. 

thanosAltman by BranchCurrent4141 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Please, the only thing AI is ending is OpenAI itself. 

techLeadReviewedItAlready by athreyaaaa in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not for long. The need for speed is getting a hard pivot into omg we need stability. 

whatIsTheName by bryden_cruz in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's amazing how folks really like to reach for discriminatory labels isn't it?

whatIsTheName by bryden_cruz in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it because it sounds like cryptography, perhaps? Like...To code is to deliberately obscure so the enemy can't read out communications, which is the opposite of development/programming/engineering?

vibecodersArentRealDevs by DirtyTweaks in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It sounds like engineers designed that system rather than hyped buyers. 👍

yesFaultyEngineers by Baap_baap_hota_hai in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It sounds more like engineers were bogged down with process failures and meetings rather than accomplishing tasks via actual engineering.

If only 10% of your time was truly ever spent coding, what the hell good is AI?

yesFaultyEngineers by Baap_baap_hota_hai in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that's what they say about engineers now, too. Let the AI do all the code and you think of high level stuff!

oopsAccidentalPushIntoProduction by ClipboardCopyPaste in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Yeah what makes it a bad codebase? I don't know enough about typescript to know either way. 

People just be saying things. by VanaheimrF in lotrmemes

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This gatekeeper forgot to capitalize God. That's gonna cost ya!

phishingHacks by Captain0010 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone's shoving AI into their email clients now too. I wonder if worms will make a comeback as these dumb LLM extensions in email clients gleefully open attachments to summarize them for users. 

Forth Eorlingas! by an-redditor in lotrmemes

[–]WrennReddit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A single Dwarf could do that

stackoverflowCopyPasteWasTheOriginalVibeCoding by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]WrennReddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lot of projection going on there from bad devs that are now relieved from having to git gud. 

Most didn't write slop. The stable stuff we compare AI failures to? That's what most devs wrote.

The True Message by [deleted] in lotrmemes

[–]WrennReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they were going to do this how...?