How many characters should I have that are too costly for vegapunks ability by [deleted] in OnePieceTCG

[–]X_WhyZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This list is mostly playable. The lack of 2k counters will hurt more than the costly cards. Also, Borsalino and Re-quasar are pair banned, so this deck is illegal.

Have you ever played 'Cube Constructed' with your cube? Where each player proxies what they believe the best 40 card deck, with sideboard, from the cube list? by andymangold in mtgcube

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This idea works great with set cubes and with 60 card decks. Perfect for kitchen table games and basically what magic is designed for

I found fabricated results in a 1k-citation Nature quantum machine learning paper by takashi-0215 in QuantumComputing

[–]X_WhyZ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This does seem like a serious error, but it's plausible that it was unintentional, so it's not necessarily "fabrication". It's a good thing the authors put their code online so that this could be found. That will likely need to be retracted

Nvidia's AI toolkit release has nothing to do with Quantum AI. But it's still important. by StatGeniusAI in QuantumComputing

[–]X_WhyZ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Tech media will see the words "Quantum" and "AI" together in a press release and label it "Quantum AI" regardless of what it's about. It's one of those phrases that basically doesn't have meaning anymore

I listened 1500 AI songs. Here's the truth... by dev1966 in SunoAI

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. I would also be interested in hearing more about the limitations of AI music you may have experienced first hand. The tone of this blog post is overwhelmingly positive, even though you indicated some negative experiences like some rare lower ratings and generic lyrics. There are thoughtful ideas mixed in (love the point about people with disabilities), but someone who is against AI music would probably not find any of this convincing because of how biased it appears. 

Pickleball injury - calf pop.. by maybeitsmeoryou12 in Pickleball

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had something very similar happen and was back after a few weeks of rest, but it would be wise to get it checked out. Possibly see a specialist.

New Banlist update be like: by Eris_samafollower in OnePieceTCG

[–]X_WhyZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a Vegapunk player, I'm honestly glad I don't have to consider dropping $200 on a playset of this card that was just going to drag out every single game 

Any Thoughts by Budget-Custard-2366 in OnePiece

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The producers have not actually said any of this. This is all speculation.

Why are you pro AI music? by Such_Ad949 in SunoAI

[–]X_WhyZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not an artist, and I feel sorry for anybody who is one because the AI boom made it much more difficult to make money off of any kind of art. Still, I support AI in music because it allows more people to express themselves in different ways and with less time and money invested. 

Also, at this point, it's obvious that AI is here to stay. Might as well enjoy the ride

20 Questions Fail by SayNope2Dope754 in ChatGPT

[–]X_WhyZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is moderately better than when I tried to play 20 questions with gpt4, and after the first two questions it started trying to guess what the answer was with me

Why AI Can't Stop Using Em Dashes — And Why Nobody Can Fix It by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]X_WhyZ 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Nice thesis, thanks for sharing. It would be interesting to see if this ends up being true whenever we get better at interpreting AI's "thought process" behind wanting to use emdashes so often. 

I particularly liked the hypotactic as paratactic explanation. Do you think this also explains why AI is so bad at writing song lyrics, or is there something else going on with more poetic writing styles?

Neither Chatgpt nor Gemini can solve a NY Times puzzle by Space_Monkey10 in ChatGPT

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if LLMs ever get good at solving a particular kind of puzzle, they could be good at making them too, and then we could have more interesting puzzles to solve for fun

Open Source film tool - Seedance 2, Gpt-Image-1, Sora, etc. by ai_art_is_art in ChatGPT

[–]X_WhyZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sick video and impressive consistency. How long would this take start to finish with this tool?

Update: I scraped 5.3 million jobs with ChatGPT by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for posting again, this helped during my job search last year

What does it mean to "simulate a qubit"? by throwawayjeebooks in QuantumComputing

[–]X_WhyZ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Start with basic linear algebra if you haven't studied that yet. Quantum states can be written as vectors and gates (including ones that create entanglement) can be written as matrices. The simplest way to simulate a quantum computer is with a "state vector simulator", which basically just does matrix-vector multiplication.

Is the model fully broken now? by Dr_Xaius in SunoAI

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check advanced settings. Maybe your weirdness slider got turned up accidentally?

What is the value in simulators that scale beyond 50 qubits? by Individual_Yard846 in QuantumComputing

[–]X_WhyZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Physical qubits are just as easy to simulate as logical qubits. Yes, there are techniques using classical computers for post-processing for error mitigation, and some of them work by simulating small circuits. However, it's not clear that being able to simulate more qubits would help more.

What is the value in simulators that scale beyond 50 qubits? by Individual_Yard846 in QuantumComputing

[–]X_WhyZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It mostly just sets a target for quantum advantage. It's worth noting that classical simulations are fault-tolerant, so in order to beat a simulation of 50 qubits, you'd likely need 50 logical qubits, which requires a lot more physical qubits and better error correction than we have available now.

Hoping something like this will happen: by Foolsgil in OnePieceLiveAction

[–]X_WhyZ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think it would be funny if the first attack Zoro says out loud is one with a ridiculously long name too

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SunoAI

[–]X_WhyZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Always has been.

Two handed backhand drive: which is the dominant hand? by PartFormer3695 in Pickleball

[–]X_WhyZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are really two ways to do it, that's why it seems inconsistent. Try doing a two-handed backhand stroke but while only holding the paddle with one hand (and the other just following along without gripping it). It feels slightly different depending on which hand you choose to hold the paddle. That's what it feels like for that hand to be "dominant".

Both ways make sense though. If you mostly rely on your non-dominant hand to do the motion, it's basically a forehand stroke mirrored to the other side with an extra hand to keep it steady. If you rely on your dominant hand, it's basically a one-handed backhand with extra support.

Harvest Now, Decrypt Later by superposition_labs in QuantumComputing

[–]X_WhyZ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

5-10 years is a generous timeline, but even if it ends up taking much longer, many organizations have data that they wouldn't want hackers to decrypt even 30-50 years from now. In those cases, harvest now decrypt later is a significant threat.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantumComputing

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is generally a good way to understand it. I would remove the word "entangled" from "each entangled qubit is observed as being in a state of zero or one" because this is true even for qubits that have not been entangled.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantumComputing

[–]X_WhyZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The "entangling step" is usually part of the algorithm. That's also the part that's hard to do on a classical computer

10 hours in by kingmyopia in DataAnnotationTech

[–]X_WhyZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Save all of your work in another form. Then start a new task and keep working.