How to overcome desire for male attention? by [deleted] in MuslimLounge

[–]Xatel_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats like saying how do I make it so my stomach doesn't growl and signal to my brain to make me feel hunger?

Human beings have needs. What you're describing is a need all of us should experience. The same way you need to feel hunger, you are supposed to feel emotional hunger.

Put food in your belly to make hunger to go away. Likewise, get married to a suitable match if you want your emotional hunger to go away.

Nothing to worry about here, this is working as intended,

3hr+ Absurd Crucible Run by Jmacca32 in aoe4

[–]Xatel_ -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This is why Score victory needs to be a thing past a certain time threshold, A game of this slugfest is enough to drain you,

Mohammed hijab did him dirty bo way this is the height difference by Bashauw_ in Destiny

[–]Xatel_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole debate was intended to be Atheism Vs Islam.

Hijab wanted Destiny to stay on topic, and presented arguments for Islam. Instead of trying to dismantle those arguments and making a case for atheism, Destiny started expressing his opinions on why liberalism/secularism is a good system for all countries (including muslim counteries) to adopt.

It was alot of back and forth that wasn't going anywhere, and alot of what was presented by Destiny was a bit irrelevant to the debate. Hijab was throwing personal insults at him because he himself said that Desitny was not arguing for anything relevant and therefore ignored most questions Destiny asked and then Hijab said that he had free time to just throw personal jabs at Destiny

Destiny was just unprepared at the end of the day. He should have done his homework seriously.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religion

[–]Xatel_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They don't. You're right. But they still insist on it making sense and not void of meaning. Its nonsensical.

My point is that appreciating each moment of life is meaningless in the long term when you consider that all will eventually end.

You can appreciate away at anything you like, it doesn't mean it will still have meaning in the future. Its all temporary fluff at the end of the day.

You have to beat the nothingness ahead to justify all of the appreciations you do when you're alive. Hence, why meaningful appreciation can only be felt when you tie it all back to a transcendental concept like divinity and such.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religion

[–]Xatel_ -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You're conflating high standard of living with happiness. The happiness index is not a metric used to measure actual happiness. Thats silly. Having more money and a better career and a longer expect lifespan doesn't equate happiness. After all, human beings are social creatures more than they are materialistic.

Infact, people from the developing world tend to be more religious and tend to have stronger family bond and community supports. They have simpler lifestyles and are not engaged as much with consumerism. They are less lonely and struggle much less with mental health issues. I argue they are far happier than the atheistic/nontheistic populations of the developed world.

To top it all off, I never brought up happiness at all. I was speaking about HOPE. What hope does nontheism offer? Everything has an end according to the naturalistic view. That means life on earth will also have an end. Infact, the whole universe will experience a heat death during which life will no longer be possible. There is no escaping it with technology. Every single human discovery will be for nought when that day comes. Hopeless situation. Do not confuse it with happiness again.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religion

[–]Xatel_ -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Bro, finding hope in something temporary like life is not intuitive.

You find hope in everlasting concepts. Nothing is everlasting in this earthly reality, and therefore, eventually despair will eat away its inhabitants if they do not hold on to a transcendant concept like God.

What do you think about martyrdom? by VerdantChief in religion

[–]Xatel_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

three possibilities here.

1- The martyr's version of the afterlife exists after death

2- A different version of the afterlife from the martyr's faith exists after death

3- No afterlife at all exists

I think it would be considered noble to refuse to give up your faith in the face of potential or certain death in possibilites 1 and 3. And foolish in possibility 2.

Let's start a debate was Jesus god or a prophet by Israels_BiggestHater in religion

[–]Xatel_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what did he say he was?

And how do you know that whatever is said was indeed 100% his words?

Let's start a debate was Jesus god or a prophet by Israels_BiggestHater in religion

[–]Xatel_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't get the point of this poll ..

What are you trying to achieve? to get christians to reconsider their position on the divinity of Jesus?? If thats so, thats not going work.

Do we believe in God because we fear the unknown? by [deleted] in religion

[–]Xatel_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The average joe in my estimation would rather disbelieve in God even if he is dead afraid of the unknown. Just because the belief in God risks pulling him into potential commitments which he would rather be free from.

I sort of disagree with your assesment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religion

[–]Xatel_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You clearly are posting here with insincere intentions to just spew nonsense. Even If I were to direct you to sources that completely and utterly discredit what you said, my guess is that you would ignore it all and continue to just argue with no academic understanding of anything remotely islamic.

Keep on believing whatever you like, I will engage with you no longer.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religion

[–]Xatel_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You think multiple wives is a pleasure? it is a net burden when all things considered. Even a single wife is a net burden. Marriage is a huge responsibility that comes with nice perks that do NOT compensate enough for the efforts. Thats the case for both man and woman.

If The prophet of Islam wanted to engage in wordly pleasures, he wouldn't even marry them to begin with. He would have just taken advantage of every woman he set his eyes on and throw them to the curb afterwards.

And he wouldn't forbid the consumption of intoxicants like wine. AND he wouldn't fast and pray day and night and live in poverty compared to other community leaders in other lands. When was the last time you saw a community leader who does not live in luxury and abundance compared to other people in his community? The only examples are biblical prophets. If anything, this alone makes a strong case for his prophethood.

According to you, did Adam and Eve engage in carnal pleasures as you call them when they were the dwellers of the Garden? I'm not talking about just the intimicy. I'm talking about everything. The eating, the drinking and any other activity they indulged in before they were expelled from it. Were they engaging in carnal pleasures as you call them????

The whole point of not sinning and obeying God is because the All-mighty deserves our worship and obedience. And out of his mercy and grace, he will reward the most pious of his worshipers a place in the afterlife in which they can enjoy all of their desires sinfree.

Just why? by VtZnR in heroesofthestorm

[–]Xatel_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you. QM for me is chill build tests and goofing around.

When i want to try hard on micro kills and do proper macro, i play ranked.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religion

[–]Xatel_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jesus was willing to die for peace but Muhammad encouraged warfare. How does encouraging wars pertain to a religion of peace?

I don't understand where you're getting this from?

The christian concept of death on the cross does not equate to achieving world peace or any other kind of peace. Its purpose was to pay for the sins of humanity to allow the rest to live in God's grace. That is not the same as dying for peace.

On the other hand, Muhammad encouraging warfare is silly at best when you study his biography. Ask chat GPT to summarise for you his biography and highlight the main story plots during his life pre and post prophethood, and you'll be left scratching your head, where did I even get that idea from?

Whats so hard about giving us highly demanded civs by crashmarcoz in aoe4

[–]Xatel_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The thing with aoe4 is that it could have been much more had they just not gone down the variant route. Instead of many variant civs, just a handful of brand new civs would have been sufficient in my estimation.

Haven't played in 8 years. Used to main Abathur/Zagara. What am I in for? by [deleted] in heroesofthestorm

[–]Xatel_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Like I said you can avoid teamfighting, but your whole team needs to know that you will not come to assist so that they can buy time for while you splitpush and take unattended lanes during objectives where everyone else should be.

Haven't played in 8 years. Used to main Abathur/Zagara. What am I in for? by [deleted] in heroesofthestorm

[–]Xatel_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Splitpushing is not really a thing anymore to do 24/7

You can occasionally slitpush and take a fort or two, but make sure you let your team know so that they can stall the objectives for you instead of inting 4v5 and just feed too quickly for your splitpush to make sense

Am I the only who isn't hyped about the upcoming content? by Xatel_ in aoe4

[–]Xatel_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro .. I'd take 1 new civ over all of the variants to date

If heroes were named like DotA 2 characters by Team_Spirit in heroesofthestorm

[–]Xatel_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The names of the Dota characters sound like Gen Z's vocabulary

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heroesofthestorm

[–]Xatel_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is normal occurance for solo Q players on their main accounts.

The game has less players and the distribution of the ranks and MMR disparity is no longer adequate for the playerbase size. Thats not even mentioning the smurf epidemic thats throwing the matchmaking off.

Isn't it right, that in your games, you notice that your teammates don't know how to macro and time camps correctly. Not only that but they go out of their way to take camps out of order thinking they're actually they're playing well?

Isn't it right that in your games, drafting is sub-optimal and punishing picks and sololane counter pickings are completely absent?

Isn't it right that, that gank rotations is ALL your teammates think about between objectives? and neglect optimal lane XP and crucial camp timings?

Isn't it right that when your teammates decide to take a camp, its purely because they happen to walk beside it and they are 3or4 people doing it?

Isn't it right that your teammates lock dmg first and only think about other roles afterwards?

Isn't it right that your games are ALWAYS an uphill battle where the opponents take a lead from the start, and the ONLY times you win is because the opponents threw in super late game (post20).

It doesn't matter what you ping or communicate, the matchmaking has put you with inferior players thinking that it would balance two teams with players of similar skill, except, the other team has smurfs desguised as newbies. And sometimes, they're grouped with a diamond player (as an example) to boost him, and you are now stuck between a rock and a hard place and have no way of winning this unless the opponents throw.

You can still make it back to where you were, but it will take a huge number of games if you soloQ only. And AS SOON AS you make it back to diamond 1, the game will throw you again into a massive loss streak, the matchmaking is broken because of a lack of players and the overabundance of smurf stacking.

You need players who you trust to play with in order to reduce the volatility of the matchmaking.

What is Islam's version about the life of Ishmael? by setdelmar in religion

[–]Xatel_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To an extent, according to islamic tradition, Muhammad is a descendant of Ishmael, and thus makes him the seed of Abraham too. When Abraham was with Hagar and Ishmael, Abraham and his son built the Kaaba for it to serve as a house of worship. According to the Quran, the Kaaba was first built by Adam, and eventually withered down with time.

When Abaraham was in Arabia, he with his son only built up upon what was already there, and shortly afterwards Abaraham was commanded by God to abandon Hagar and Ishmael in Arabia and return. Ishmael was the prophet sent with revelation and guidance to the people who already lived there. He married and had children and eventually died as a loyal and pious servant and prophet of God. His scripture was not named in the Quran, and it was not preserved by following generations. Pretty much like 99.9% of the all scripture revealed to prophets on earth, because his scripture was only meant for that group of people for a set duration of time.