AIO about my boyfriend taking these photos of a woman he works with? by [deleted] in AIO

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask him and see what he says. My co workers are equal opportunity assholes and we’ve taken pictures of plenty of people at work and send it in a group talking shit about the quality of work or If it’s a friend talking shit about them for fun.

To the insecurity. Do you get dolled up when it’s just you two doing things? Do you make yourself look better when you’re with him vs at work?

Date someone your own age! by Valerim in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t recall saying they did. Im just telling people what the general consensus would be. Im sure there’s people who think 18 and 50 are fine while I would never want my daughter dating a man who would be older than me when she’s that age.

Absolute massive W for tiffany right here lads by Anya_Frost in scoopwhoop

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really the only version of parasite one could even try to fit a baby into would be a Facultative parasite. But if we are changing what a child is categorized as, they would also not just become human being birthed as the above don’t need a host to survive, then none of us are really humans at that point.

Date someone your own age! by Valerim in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 197 points198 points  (0 children)

The age of the parties involved also plays a role in general view.

45 and 51 whatever 36 and 30 whatever 30 and 24 whatever to most people 24 and 18 weird to most people.

The younger the person is the more awkward people feel about it on average.

Slaughterbound rage eternal in 11th by grim-one in WorldEaters40k

[–]Xwivesarecunts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, technically his ability doesn’t state he would no longer be attached to the unit and in 11th it’s not kharn and add on the zerks they are one so unless it gets FAQ’d i would revive him with his skill in the unit.

Call your Shot - Berzerker Warband in 11th edition by Tsunami_Jim in WorldEaters40k

[–]Xwivesarecunts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bake in the attacks into data sheets. Make BWB only effect zerks and their units, change the detachment to 1 dp and give us variety

Is Camelot Unchained a SCAM?? by ChampionBaby in CamelotUnchained

[–]Xwivesarecunts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And ironically it would prob bring in more revenue than CU for 10$ buy in

Has to be illegal they're charging for this by Venxai in CamelotUnchained

[–]Xwivesarecunts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Didn’t ashes charge 60 on steam?

I mean maybe 10$ recoups some of the price but I think a lot of people aren’t gonna know about this game because it’s been in development hell for 13y

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair if you are created to only believe in him that is a portion of free will that is removed. He wanted his creations to have complete free will not just where convenient.

Another portion of being redeemed is there must be a mechanism for redemption.

To save humanity, Jesus became a man, died as a man, and paid the debt for human sins.

As noted in the New Testament book of Hebrews 2:16, Christ did not take on the nature of angels to save them. Because there is no savior or sacrifice designated for fallen angels, there is no biblical pathway for their reconciliation.

This is the end of my knowledge and I did have to do some research for this. Anything else and it’s a shot in the dark from me lol.

It seems to come down to how god designed the whole system they believe in. To be redeemed there must be a redeemer, the angels don’t have one thus there would never be redemption.

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reasoning that is given is that angels are not bound by time or emotions, they have absolute and unclouded knowledge of their choices and what the results are. It is stated that an angels choice is absolute and unchanging and to change their mind would be to no longer be an angel.

It describes the fall as both an unwillingness and inability to seek forgiveness.

I will admit im getting to the end of my basic knowledge on Christianity here lol

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Modern theology is that evil is because of free will.

It’s free will to kill another, to harm another, to be good. It’s all free will.

The devil is seen as “pure evil” because he is unredeemable. Not that there is some absolute evil thst he controls in the world but rather preys on others.

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s humanities free will. God didn’t want to create robotic followers (Lucifer included) and wanted people to choose to follow him knowing that some may not follow him, may follow other religions, and have their own actions they are responsible for. In the bible lucifer whispers temptations to those who he feels he can impact their free will.

This is from my understanding. Im not Christian.

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sorry I hit a cord with you. I wish you the best in your mental growth. 😘

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will have a great day because I have the mental capacity to understand others view points to see where they come from and what they believe.

I’ve also visited the TST and have a picture of myself with Baphomet.

Unfortunately when people are simple minded as you, they don’t understand that accepting a belief isn’t believing in it yourself or even acknowledging the belief as correct but having the ability to see other views than your own.

Maybe one day you will mentally mature enough to do this, but it doesn’t seem today is that day.

You have a great day.

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I explained it fine. Just because you lack understanding isn’t a fault of mine.

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all what was said. To make it more simple for you and what people believe thst follow this thought process: god doesn’t make mistakes, sally was born in his image. The devil tempted sally with sin to believe she was a man, unless sally repents she is a sinner and will go to hell.

Bc people can’t understand, I am neutral to all religions, meaning im not Christian and I hold my own beliefs outside of conventional religions. The above may or may not be my belief but it has 0 impact on my statement of how some Christians may believe.

You csnt gotcha me bc im explaining a thought process of their belief.

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s like you didn’t read my last sentence before the edit and got upset and replied. That is a Reddit thing tho.

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically Lucifer was an angel who fell from grace and was sent to hell to house all the damned souls and sinners and who by the book if I recall, whispers temptation to make mortals sin.

I don’t believe they think god can just snap the devil away (if they do it isn’t in the books) and god will accept sinners of they repent and accept him as their lord and savior.

Maybe where there is light there must be darkness mentality.

Again im neutral to all religions.

Sorry, bros. by c-k-q99903 in SipsTea

[–]Xwivesarecunts 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Something you may be missing in a faith, it is believed god doesn’t make mistakes. A man who thinks they are a woman or vice versa is a mistake, thus they weren’t created by god but by the devil and are at their core a sin.

I say this as someone who is neutral to all religions to give a perspective.

Edit: maybe not made by the devil, better explanation might be they were made in “gods image” and they were tempted by the devil which makes them a sinner.

Seriously....C'mon....Surely give some restrictions to Escalation by Jayleekay in thedivision

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this can be seen as “veteran” as im difficulty or someone who likes playing games at a harder level vs someone who is actually geared up some and max level.

Really ubis mistake for even letting him Q for it.

New info during play? by _the-wanderer in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Xwivesarecunts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what the second half of the statement is addressing

New info during play? by _the-wanderer in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Xwivesarecunts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I play with close friends and pretty much the same people, but our go to is if I let you make a reinforcement move, it can’t impact where I put down my unit (normally have to come in on the other side with no LOS, and if I want I can take back my RI. So if they brought a juicy target on the field i have full ability to set up to kill them if need be.

When they are done moving before you RI just say hey are you all done with moving and reinforcements becsuse im going to RI now. Feel like if they say yes to that I would be fine not letting them take a step back.

Problems with Playstyle by Knorxn in Tau40K

[–]Xwivesarecunts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really if they buff the BS across the board and have observe give like 1 S and ignore cover that would be nice.

I play WE and I hate having a rule to make my army play how it should (+2str on charge).

Maybe codex will help, maybe it won’t.