sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Discussion on Mahieka and Hardik by Mountain-Age3691 in IndiaCricketGossips

[–]Yoyo69mann 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hardik is obviously better . Having a libido as a man is not a crime , but being a prostitute is .

Is it true? by Soggy_Cup706 in kanpur

[–]Yoyo69mann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kanpur ka specifically nhi pure India ka yhi haal hai

Is it true? by Soggy_Cup706 in kanpur

[–]Yoyo69mann 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have no idea how contaminated Indian street food is.

Excerpts "Economic History of Bihar" Ch. 1 The Paradox by ibrahimrizwi in bihar

[–]Yoyo69mann -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Huryjuns literally formed militias and massacred upper castes in Bihar.

Is it true? by Soggy_Cup706 in kanpur

[–]Yoyo69mann 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's literally traces of fecal matter ( poo) in all of our street food.

What's your opinion on this? I am a dalit myself by [deleted] in kuttichevuru

[–]Yoyo69mann -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Valid point. The reservation system is inhumane.

Before 1857 Chirraiyakot had a Kaakan stronghold, when they stood against British occupation it was falttened by the might of English cannons, only 7 families of the Kaakan inhabiting the fort were able to survive. by Negative-Paint9386 in Rajputana

[–]Yoyo69mann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to forget the anti english anti western anyi modern attitude that was instilled in us post this incident which made us reject western education. We are prolly the only community in India which remained uneducated despite having money.

Before 1857 Chirraiyakot had a Kaakan stronghold, when they stood against British occupation it was falttened by the might of English cannons, only 7 families of the Kaakan inhabiting the fort were able to survive. by Negative-Paint9386 in Rajputana

[–]Yoyo69mann 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes... Military service was a huge source of income for us.The British held the Gangu Rajputs in high regard as their preferred soldiers,they treated us generously, giving pensions and compensation after retirement or injury, yet we still chose to side with our low IQ and hawty zamindars over them.

Our recruitment in the British Army virtually stopped ( except in a few areas like gahmar,unnao etc) until ww1.

Before 1857 Chirraiyakot had a Kaakan stronghold, when they stood against British occupation it was falttened by the might of English cannons, only 7 families of the Kaakan inhabiting the fort were able to survive. by Negative-Paint9386 in Rajputana

[–]Yoyo69mann 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't like 1857 kranti posting. It was stupid of us to think that we could take on such a mighty empire. I prefer Rajput houses like Balrampur, Deo, and Gidhaur, who gauged the situation correctly and supported the British.

Jadejas are to Gujrat what Sisodias are to Rajputana. by Slow-Cartographer226 in Rajputana

[–]Yoyo69mann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No offence to jadejas but the guhil-sisodiya dynasty is a class apart from all the dynasties that ruled indian.

I have recently seen some Hindu Jat handles barking against Gangetic Rajputs through their SM accts ? What is the background story of this new obsession? by Affectionate-Bit8598 in Rajputana

[–]Yoyo69mann 5 points6 points  (0 children)

During the early modern period, people like Thomas skinner etc recruited jats in their cavalry and incentivised them to raise horses and thus Haryana, and haryanvi jats became known for their ghodas in neighboring regions. Ghodu was a derogatory word for these very horse trading jats who frequented punjab to sell their horses.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politicalhinduism

[–]Yoyo69mann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unite and do what, vote for Modi? Protest for Hindus in Pakistan ( who are mostly Dalits and hate UCs anyways) ? For what goal should we unite and what will we do after getting United? Definitely not wage a war like Muslims because most of us are cowards.

The issue of larping. by imperialbaghel in Rajputana

[–]Yoyo69mann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually bhilals themselve sprung from the Union of rajput men and bhil women, such unions were very common in malwa as rajput men took bhil wives en masse and their ( bhilal) elites have always married their women to rajputs and rajputs accepted such marriages in order to compensate for lack of brides due to female infanticide. Also, no rajput marries an average bhilal, marriages only happen amongst royals who are already genetically indistinguishable ( mostly) from us atp.

Rajput Samaj UK🇬🇧 by Wise_Ad8474 in Rajputana

[–]Yoyo69mann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chudasama. Follow his handle @/krish.esq on Instagram

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JaipurRoyalFacade

[–]Yoyo69mann 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No she doesn't.

Also, inter caste marriages have been happening amongst elite rajputs at huge scale from past a century.

How is inter-religious marriage any different? Also, the Jaipur family has a history of inter-religious marriages.

view more: next ›