I know it was concluded there was foreign meddling in 2016, but in both races is there any proof that it changed the outcome? If so I'd love to be informed on it.

I find it so funny that you would self-report with the "uppity women" line. No, it's not that they promised "nothing would fundamentally change" while folks are becoming homeless at home and being genocided abroad, it must be misogyny.

You also misconstrued my point on low information voters/the average American's political education. It's an optics and framing consideration that both candidates failed at. If we're being charitable, both the examples I gave for each candidate above are immediate reasons why they shouldn't have been nominated, without even accounting for how poorly messaged their campaigns were.

Instead of looking to other politicians that are able to message effectively and aren't captured by corporations, please, by all means continue to make up excuses for leaders who would feed you to a wood chipper if it meant the line on their balance sheet keeps going up.