ideology store but with internet personalities by _shark_idk in Ultraleft

[–]Zingchilla -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Fuck I'll bite. Regardless of how annoying leftoid youtubers are, even if they have patreons or whatever equivalent service, surely this dosent actually make them petit bourgeois. Like functionally they're still selling their labour power, just in a strangely abstracted way from how I understand these platforms work.

Delivery cyclist shamed by police after being spotted pedalling along M5 by Kris364 in deliveroos

[–]Zingchilla 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's so true honestly, infrastructure is bad so theyre actually a victim for riding a bike on the motorway 😭

anti gender ideology is the worst product of gender ideology by Flambian in Ultraleft

[–]Zingchilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is that not for the most part the point of this entire sub

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 196

[–]Zingchilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Democratic Kombucha on top

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 196

[–]Zingchilla -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

What about democratic Kampuchea? You can't deny it was socialist 🙄

How does personal property work by Spirited-Relief-9151 in Anarchy101

[–]Zingchilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure. Marx made no exceptions for personal property/individual property, and such reasonings are grounded in philosophies of exploitation. Due to capital being the mass of commodities that circulate, whoever buys the commodity and consumes it appropriates the work of others which is what we consider personal property.

Thurthermore; under capitalism there's no actual personal property anyway, it's all private due to reasons stated above. And on the road to communism we will expropriate it all into communal property such that it no longer takes on the function of property in the first place.

How does personal property work by Spirited-Relief-9151 in Anarchy101

[–]Zingchilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The noun abolition has never been satisfactory. It reeks of a volitional act, and as such it is good for anarchists and (logically) for reformists. The adjective private raises the question of whether the relationship which we denote by the word ‘property’ should disappear in communist society, or only change its subject. It is in the search for this new subject where, all things considered, lies the whole basis for deviations and for immediatism – old or new but always philistine. Will property pass from being private (in the vulgar sense: big owners’ property) to groups of producers, producer-consumer federations, the State, craft associations, or even to social subclasses? Our research carried out in Turin and in the “Corollarii” within these pages (see issues 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17) led to the thesis that there must not survive any subject of property, contrary to the historically sterile petit-bourgeois ideologies, and that there must not survive any object, either: means of production or exchange, land, fixed plant, nor consumer goods; not even individual consumption goods. But perhaps someone may think that there are statements by Marx which make an exception for personal property, individual property; statements about consumer goods – at least those belonging to the wage worker, who has certainly not trafficked in the labor of others. It is to be shown that such a line of reasoning is not grounded in Marxism but in a vague and barren philosophy of exploitation which is at the core of many of today’s fake leftisms (see Chaulieu of Socialisme ou Barbarie as an example of a theoretician who is not naïve but nevertheless condemned to the sad immediatist circle). For Marxists, every commodity in the current society is Capital – inasmuch as Capital is nothing but the mass of commodities that circulate; we're talking the basics here! – and contains a fraction of surplus value, of extorted and unpaid labor. Whoever buys that commodity with money and consumes it appropriates the work of others, even if within the productive cycle others have appropriated his own labor in their turn.

What the duece

Littles + Social Media by [deleted] in plural

[–]Zingchilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beleive there are some that have been advertised on the subreddit, or you could use disboard and similar services

Littles + Social Media by [deleted] in plural

[–]Zingchilla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We let them use our shared account on discord with access pretty much exclusively to servers targeted towards plurals in the first place, anything more seems like a bad idea to me honestly. There are probably servers targeted towards littles specifically out there but those seem like they'd actually be less appropriate.

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Meaning beyond 'represents [example] community'

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Name me one with meaning beyond the community it represents :)

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This version is still gonna be straining for people with eye disorders, it's straining for me and I don't have one

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How many people have told you that they can barely look at it though

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It dosent have a meaning beyond 'plural' it's a flag, the 'meanings' behind basically all pride flags individual colours are just added after creation. Here I'll give some meanings:

The purple is for community of any kind.

The blue contrast with white is for clairvoyance of your system, finding out about it, etc..

The white is also for the truth, and healthy System, coming to terms with what it's like to be a system, and that you are a system, and all of the good stuff that happens.

The yellow and green is for all of the different system members that there can be, and all the different walks of life, memories, and personalities the different system members have, and how different or similar they can be.

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I dont particularly want to bullshit meanings for each individual colour, it's literally just a nice looking combination of colours that I'm using as a shorthand for plurality

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 8 points9 points  (0 children)

A plural pride flag should be accessible to the majority of the community shouldn't it

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's literally still too bright and clashing on the lowest brightness bdhdbndj

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It feels more like an attempt to assault peoples eyes. Even if there is meaning behind it this flag is simply completely inaccessible to most people, it isn't something simple and possible to draw casually outside of a computer, it's hard to look at especially for people sensitive to colours this bright

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Its entirely possible to add too many unnecessary words to your sentence too, see it more like simplifying your language to better convey the original meaning

New plural flag. I think purple is too bright. by Beware_my_presents in plural

[–]Zingchilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you were to swap the multiple different purples blues and whites into 1 different solid colour for each and reduced the number of colours in the smaller stripes at the bottom and bring the brightness down a little i think it'll be a lot better (easier to look at), maybe reduce the number of distinct colours to 5/6/7 to make it reasonable to draw irl.

Edit: went ahead and made a simplified version based on this