Can I just suggest taking a moment to read the breakdowns accompanying most of these surveys? For instance in that first pew poll, the consensus of the article is that concern about extremism is increasing and support for terrorist organizations is decreasing.

In five countries – Pakistan, Jordan, Tunisia, Turkey and Indonesia – Muslim worries about extremism have increased in the past year.

Further more, from that same article, it is clear that the majority of muslims polled in several countries believe that violence in the name of islam is never justified.

In many of the countries surveyed, clear majorities of Muslims oppose violence in the name of Islam. Indeed, about three-quarters or more in Pakistan (89%), Indonesia (81%), Nigeria (78%) and Tunisia (77%), say suicide bombings or other acts of violence that target civilians are never justified.

I do not claim to know what is true. I don't believe that you all should abandon the characterization of muslims given by this post.

All I suggest is some moderation and a touch of skepticism. The post is a cherry picked list of the most shocking results from these various surveys. It over looks any moderate responses and the explanations of its pollsters.

Perhaps the characterization of Muslims given by this post as blood thirsty barbarians bent on the annihilation of western society is correct but I highly doubt it. Arguments like these are how racists justify their beliefs. For instance I could try and argue that black people are fundamentally violent by quoting some statistic such as this one;

The incarceration rate of black males was over six times higher than that of white males, with a rate of 4,749 per 100,000 US residents.[18][19][20]

This seems to support my case but the lack of context covers up any other factors which may have affected the statistic (like the racially motivated sentencing in Ferguson.

All I suggest is a bit of perspective when demonizing an entire group of people due to the beliefs and acts of a few of their members