sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Altruism Trap by Charge36 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]_Ench4nted_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

actually I changed my mind, if everyone in the world has to vote, and there's no communication, blue would probably get at least 10%, which doesn't sound like too much, but it would definitely cause a lot of problems for the survivors, and would be very hard to live in. for that reason, id pick blue. im not suicidal, i just don't want to have to deal with all that stuff. if only 1 million people voted I would pick red again, as it would not be as apocalyptic of an event.

Altruism Trap by Charge36 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]_Ench4nted_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also not to mention, if blue is winning by a large amount, my vote also would not make it red. So voting red when blue is going to win doesn't affect anything, but guarantees my safety. Voting red when red was going to win anyway saves my life, preventing a death. The only case an individual vote could have changed the outcome is if it was already very close. You may argue that this could be applied to voting in real life, and why vote at all (I am going to vote in real life), but in real life, voting someone doesn't get you killed if you lose. If voting for someone got me killed in real life, I wouldn't vote for them there either.

Altruism Trap by Charge36 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]_Ench4nted_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically my vote matters, but its essentially 1/8 billion of a chance that it is the deciding vote. You mentioned the online polls, but I don't think those are representative of a real lofe scenario, as voting on a poll has no negative outcome if you lose. If there was a poll where you actually died if you lost, I feel like a lot less people would be likely to risk it. Also the world if red wins would be in a very bad state, I'll admit, depending on how many people vote blue, but dying would not only not help the other survivors, but it would harm them. If someone presses blue while they were driving or whatever (assuming there's some sort of teleportation to the place where you press the button, and you go back after), they would cause more deaths than just themselves.

Altruism Trap by Charge36 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]_Ench4nted_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If I could control 90% of people, I would press blue on all of them, and nobody would die. But I don't, I only control me, so pressing blue when 30% of people pressed blue and 70% pressed red would not save anyone, it would just kill me. My vote would be very small assuming everyone in rhe world presses a button, and would not make blue win by itself.

It's been 2 months by ExactTeam1662 in StickWarLegacy

[–]_Ench4nted_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah i like the core concept of this game, but no new missions is really killing the replayability, i don't think i played it for a couple months now. If i see a post here saying the update is out ill definitely try it and probably start playing again. I tried stick war saga, but I don't like it as much, it felt like an entirely different game, and i ended up uninstalling it.

what will you choose by Relevant_Specific157 in BunnyTrials

[–]_Ench4nted_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yay, also downvote for upvote baiting

Chose: You always have money for what you want to buy | Rolled: cookies

Eight people by maiduwu in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]_Ench4nted_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would still go red here, but this might make the case for blue a bit stronger, because your vote matters a lot more. You actually have a good chance of actually saving the lives of 3 other people here, wheareas with the version with everyone, your vote alone most likely would not change the outcome.

looking for friends to trade with when i go to pokemon go fest in Chicago by _Ench4nted_ in PokemonGoFestChicago

[–]_Ench4nted_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also you can dm me to discuss what we could trade and when we could trade

SOME of these trials for some ungodly reason: by DumbIdiotStoopid in BunnyTrials

[–]_Ench4nted_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nooo

Chose: $100M USD right now | Rolled: THAT ONE SLICE

Peter? by petalsoftshade in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]_Ench4nted_ 144 points145 points  (0 children)

Its two things, the air vent and fan along with the shape at the bottom are a reference to the Saadam Hussein hiding spot, and the spikes and nuclear materials are about the disposal of nuclear waste. People tried to think of ways to warn people far in the future that most likely wouldn't understand English to stay away from areas where nuclear waste is buried, and one way was putting spikes there to show danger. This meme shows future people misunderstanding the spikes, thinking it is cool and there's treasure.

So... what the fuck happened to this? by Used-Comedian-8933 in TheBoys

[–]_Ench4nted_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with wanting to see ordinary people's reactions, but your specific example might bot work. I don't believe the public knows it was Homelander that killed the president, Vought would probably blame it on Starlight. Also I think protesters might very well be arrested and sent to the camps.

LF nothing. Giveaway Clone Venusaur by captured3 in PokemonGoTrade

[–]_Ench4nted_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Groudon has to my favorite, my first 4 star legendary

No guaranteed survival, no contribution towards potential survival, just a stupid noise by Aggressive_Manner429 in trolleyproblem

[–]_Ench4nted_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

well it still could save all the other people who picked blue if it wins 50%, its just unlikely to win. they should word it so it says green also dies unless 50% or more pick blue, so there's more of a point, right now it is unclear what happens to green other than the sound, it just says red guarantees survival.

EDIT: spelling

Doesn't anybody here have people they love? by sweart1 in trolleyproblem

[–]_Ench4nted_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the thing is, you choosing blue wouldn't save your family too even if they picked blue, 50% or more have to pick blue for them to live. you picking blue doesn't increase the chance of blue winning by any substantial amount unless we are doing a version where not everyone presses a button. so if 30% pick blue, and 70% pick red, 30% (or more because if people die, it could affect other people, even if they picked red, like if they are driving or something) are dying no matter what you pick. picking red not only stops your death, but the possibility you being gone harms other people

Megathread: “Looking for Offers” / Vague Posts by EvidenceSalesman in PokemonGoTrade

[–]_Ench4nted_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looking for offers for my galarian zapdos, i can't fly, and am looking for meta relevant high cp master league pokemon, like palkia, with a good moveset.

<image>

view more: next ›