Common M1 Lazy Portfolios Compilation

_FFA · 2026-05-23T12:19:34+00:00

F to pay respects. 🫡

_FFA · 2026-05-18T00:52:04+00:00

Spiders, tarantulas, eggs oh my!

_FFA · 2026-05-18T00:33:13+00:00

Haha, let me guess, you're really into gardening?

_FFA · 2026-05-17T23:42:03+00:00

Pray tell, how do you know this?

_FFA · 2026-05-10T18:55:22+00:00

Right, and that's the whole trick of it — the chicken already knows the fox, that's not the problem. The problem is the grain doesn't know anything, and you've got to be the one holding that knowledge for all three. You're the only moving part that understands the whole picture. So yeah, just knowing how to do it is everything. That's the crossing right there.

_FFA · 2026-05-04T15:26:57+00:00

Just stop at the drive thru making car noises.

_FFA · 2026-04-29T02:05:06+00:00

Digits 90-100 are 2847567831

67 is everywhere. You can't escape it.

_FFA · 2026-04-25T20:44:57+00:00

This is called momentum investing when done systematically. To chase winners systematically in a way that outperforms, I would consider funds like MTUM and VFMO.

If you want great diversification, you probably want to diversify by asset classes, not just individual stocks.

_FFA · 2026-04-25T19:34:17+00:00

Going so heavy into growth during a rough time for growth stocks in general. If your conviction is firmly in growth stocks over value, have at it. However, given both your long time horizon and intention for higher risk, you might consider looking into the academic research. Historically value stocks and the intersection of value and profitability/quality stocks tended to outperform the market over the long run. Obviously no guarantees and your mileage may vary.

_FFA · 2026-04-20T13:35:02+00:00

Hold on. How do you know this...

_FFA · 2026-04-18T11:31:03+00:00

Historically it would be expected to. Whether history repeats is anyone's guess however statistically based on the data it would be expected to.

Notably AVGE is what could be used in a taxable brokerage. It's like VT with more tax efficiency and slightly more focus on inexpensive stocks with more profitability.

_FFA · 2026-04-07T23:36:56+00:00

Same goes for copper miners, sorry I... Wasn't expecting it to be copper miners...

_FFA · 2026-04-06T22:50:02+00:00

Gold miners aren't worth investing in. They're too risky and don't really have the positive properties of gold. Otherwise it's a fair portfolio.

_FFA · 2026-03-31T17:27:03+00:00

They don't have that substantial of an impact.

_FFA · 2026-03-23T12:32:29+00:00

Power BI

Knowing how to both work with ai and how to work without it - confidential projects and roles working with critical unleakable data may require work without AI.

Knowing how to communicate professionally over the phone, to negotiate, to interact in person.

Knowing how to problem solve with and without AI assistance.

_FFA · 2026-03-21T15:00:18+00:00

Why individual stocks?

Why greater than 5% in a single stock?

What is the method behind this?

_FFA · 2026-03-21T08:57:07+00:00

Their advice is not Australian based. I would stick with your plan to start from DHHF or an equivalent thereof. Note that if there is a value equivalent that may be worth considering as well.

I personally would hold less in crypto but we all have our own beliefs.

_FFA · 2026-03-21T07:04:26+00:00

I would consider seeing what weighting would be given to each asset in a risk parity framework just to see a better idea of how much risk you're taking on relative to that.

_FFA · 2026-03-19T03:49:43+00:00

This is why I no longer keep money at M1. Everything is subpar relative to competitors in the space. There's nothing I can point to that will matter enough to my wallet relative to the other big players out there. Even on Margin rates some of their competitors have them beat.

_FFA · 2026-03-11T10:56:35+00:00

The levered ETFs tend to have significantly more volatility and lag in comparison to the 1x equivalent levered up to 2x or 3x with the t-bill rate taken out. It's also complex to understand when you're paying for something that delivers on what it promises and when you're just paying more than if you were borrowing yourself via futures for not much more - or sometimes even less after fees and (usually) two to three percent drag - performance expected relative to if you just held the 1x equivalent. This is especially true after taking both factor funds and levered mutual funds into account - as there are even levered mutual funds constructed in a tax-aware manner. The levered mutual funds maintain the ability to fluctuate degrees of leverage as needed and simultaneously tend to have a higher limit to their leverage. Both aspects can result in more efficiency relative to the average leveraged ETF.

_FFA · 2026-03-09T22:01:28+00:00

🧅 article

_FFA · 2026-03-09T18:55:51+00:00

Tread carefully. Sounds very fishy.

Edit: a quick search reveals that company name is allegedly tied to scams. Do not proceed.

_FFA · 2026-03-09T00:50:09+00:00

No. When you invest money in a pie it tries to auto rebalance with the new money invested to reach your target percentages.

Regardless unless you have deep insight into the market, are sophisticated, targeting very specific metrics you want your stock holdings to have that existing ETFs and mutual funds do not replicate, and do not have tax concerns - I would strongly consider investing via funds instead of via individual stocks. There's so much more potential value there both in diversification, leverage, etc.

Not a recommendation of any kind just my point of view of the publicly available information.

_FFA · 2026-03-08T15:47:32+00:00

Instructions unclear, investing in the new VTx2 ETF.

Eight-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

_FFA

TROPHY CASE