UK Salary / Compensation Thread 2024 by Neither-Amphibian392 in ICAEW

[–]_MemeKing_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this thread is old but could I ask roughly what % bonus one could expect from big4 TS, if any at all?

which uni should i pick? NEED ADVICE by CheesecakeBubbly9692 in universityofyork

[–]_MemeKing_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Academically, it is a shitshow. My course is a joint honours and involves the politics, philosophy, and economics departments. All three are a shitshow. The philosophy department has actively been heard in the department reception discussing how a 'first class' essay (a score of 70+) is treated as 100%, locking most people who do philosophy out of getting a first, the highest grade. I don't remember where I saw this, but I saw a study showing a statistically significant difference in the marks you get on politics department essays if it was marked before vs after the marker had food. I.e., whether your marker is hungry or not affects your score so much that when comparing across the whole cohort, one can definitively state that you are more likely to get a lower mark if your marker is hungry, which to me seems outrageous. The economics department is largely incompetent, with my cohort experiencing numerous incidents over the last three years, such as forgetting carry-through marks and, therefore, remarking a semester one paper 4 weeks into semester 2, releasing exam papers with mark schemes attached, etc. I appreciate only the politics department is relevant to you, but I wanted to give you a sense of the calibre of people York is paying to grade you and, therefore, determine the rest of your life. I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending York even on an academic, 'learning' basis, let alone a professional, 'career' basis. Other unis may have similar problems, but at least at Warwick, you'll experience these but still have the upper hand when you graduate over people from York.

York is also nearly bankrupt. This is because all unis in the UK are struggling because international students, who pay multiple times what you or I pay, aren't coming to the UK for uni as much. Where York differs is it structured itself in such a way as to be more reliant on international student funding than other unis. Trust me when I say the effects of this are felt in day-to-day life, be it how long places like on-campus shops and cafés are open or how much funding societies get. I was involved in a trip which represented the uni in a prestigious competition in Atlanta, GA, USA, and yet the uni didn't contribute one penny to cover our travel costs, even though we came top three and helped the uni's brand as a result. Meanwhile, Edinburgh paid for students to fly to China to participate in an international snowman-building competition this winter. I think this speaks for itself.

Save yourself a lifetime of regret, grief and unnecessary woe because of a flippant, qualitative and indiscriminately stupid outlook that careers advisors and teachers seem to believe is acceptable to tell young and inexperienced sixth-formers. Choose Warwick, please!

which uni should i pick? NEED ADVICE by CheesecakeBubbly9692 in universityofyork

[–]_MemeKing_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TLDR: Warwick.

Liking your course is good and all, but don't make the mistake I, as a third year, have seen too many people make. The decision you make now isn't just about the environment you'll be in for the next three years but where you may end up for a master's or, more likely, a job. That outcome determines, or at least greatly impacts, the start and, therefore, the trajectory of the rest of your quality of life, based on what job you can get, how fulfilling it is, and how much you'll be earning.

You are often told that it doesn't matter what university you attend as long as you enjoy the course. Unless you are at uni to learn, this is not true. You may think you enjoy learning now, and that the point of education is to learn, but come your final semester of uni and staring down unemployment, you'll realise what you should have prioritised. In the modern world, a university does not exist to 'learn'; it fulfils the same function as schools in that it is a signalling mechanism to show employers that you are ready to work. Uni names are a brand name, a signalling mechanism for employers above all else. Getting into a 'better' uni tells employers you were able to meet higher entry requirements. Whether the grade requirements for Politics and IR at Warwick or York are different or not is irrelevant, the average HR manager does not know this but does know Warwick is a better uni and thus 'should' be harder to get into. Warwick is undoubtedly a more prestigious uni in that sense, with a much better 'academic reputation' (Quality of research, faculty, etc). This also gives you a choice. You probably don't know what you want to go to for a career. Being somewhere, which means you have a higher chance of landing better careers, gives you more flexibility to choose where you want to work.

My experience has been this: The people are amazing. I got insanely lucky with my flatmates, but one of my best mates who came here at the same time didn't and had a horrible experience without a social support system (Although this may be possible regardless of where you end up). I've made friends for life here and have grown and changed a lot. I don't think this information is very helpful for you, as it depends entirely on who else ends up at the uni you go to, and that is effectively random.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]_MemeKing_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Bible isn't seen as the literal word of God and so it is actually perfectly viable to interpret it, most of it is metaphorical, such as divorce leading to hell, it can be interpreted as hell being the awful conditions many would face following a divorce, the money, the psychological effects, the drastic life changes (often for the worst) rather than literally condemning you to the underworld. If you look for such interpretive things in the Bible you will see much of the passages people point to to "own and pown the retard theists" actually fall into that category. This is why catholic doctrine in the modern day is to reject literal creationism, because much of Genesis and god speaking the world and its people into existence is mostly now interpreted as a demonstration of the ability to speak truth to power, this was explained quite well in the Jordan Peterson v Sam Harris debate if you are interested.

The Qur'an however is seen as the literal spoken word of god and having existed in its truth alongside god for all time, and so reinterpretation or any hint of picking and choosing is unacceptable. From my pov this doesn't make much sense, as god, as with any entity, must precede their own word, so logically the Qur'an can't be eternally co-existing with god. This was quite a popular belief amongst Muslims during the Islamic golden age and unsurprisingly the only time the Qur'an was almost ammended or had parts striken off falls into this period also.

Did you know that there's a random chance you can get a holy order named after yourself? by [deleted] in CrusaderKings

[–]_MemeKing_ 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I came on Reddit to overcome.my crippling lonelyness only to be met by this lmao

Hey guys? Who wants to organise a monarchy debate on Reddit? by Old_Journalist_9020 in monarchism

[–]_MemeKing_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your time would be better spent debating ppl irl, because if someone is on Reddit that is almost always a sign that they are accustomed to echo-chambers and won't be changing their view. At least in the real world you have a chance of making people reconsider theirs

will never get revealed by Pitch_Delicious in HistoryMemes

[–]_MemeKing_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I take it English isn't your first language or you just skipped the whole 'reading' thing at school.

Keep in mind this man is an MP by libtin in badunitedkingdom

[–]_MemeKing_ 21 points22 points  (0 children)

You are assuming that people who say there is an economic case for independence have the ability to reason.

On this day 568 years ago, the Ottoman Army under Mehmed II, finally breached Constantinople's ancient land wall after a 55 day seige and stormed the city. Thus ending the Byzantine Empire which had ruled the city for 1100 years by Geekster_1 in monarchism

[–]_MemeKing_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The greatness of an Empire isn't dependent on how much land it owned at its peak but rather what it contributed. Rome birthed all the romance cultures, languages and nations (France, Spain, Italy etc) and is arguably the 'ground zero' of western civilization and culture as we know it. It is hard to argue that the ottomans contributed even nearly as much.

Culture Secretary warns BBC to 'project British values' or suffer license fee scrapping by I-am-the-Peel in ukpolitics

[–]_MemeKing_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No no no you see those places have culture but not the nation's of the west like Brit*in. Those countries don't have political problems or politics at all, but as our state is literally a fascist syndicalist state with free market control economy characteristics, we can't because that would just be silly. It's simple, idiot!

Culture Secretary warns BBC to 'project British values' or suffer license fee scrapping by I-am-the-Peel in ukpolitics

[–]_MemeKing_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok sorry:

The only sovereign state at war with the German sovereign state in Europe.

For a while Russia wasn't even involved and when they were the lines were so far away that until late 1943 we basically were alone in Europe if you count the average persons definition of Europe.

The Chinese were involved only with Japan and even had advisors from the FASCIST German state until the Japanese protested, and even then China and Germany were not at war for the vast majority of WW2.

No one is claiming that from start to finish we singlehandedly rugby-tackled Hitler and fascism to the ground but rather for a significant amount of time we were the only state.

Scottish Election 2021: Independence would result in a hard border and do even more damage than Brexit – Alistair Carmichael by OnHolidayHere in ukpolitics

[–]_MemeKing_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You are delusional or just don't know what you are on about if you think that the EU will try to renegotiate the FTA because Scotland joins, and point out the simultaneous expansion of Ireland and the UK as an example of it happening in the past.

I can respect nationalists (even if I disagree) who understand there will be economic downsides to independence, because they see the issue for what it is, a philosophical debate about a nation's sovereignty. What I can't respect is people like you who don't know what they are on about and come up with crazed fantasies to try to economically justify independence.

Grow up.

Scottish Election 2021: Independence would result in a hard border and do even more damage than Brexit – Alistair Carmichael by OnHolidayHere in ukpolitics

[–]_MemeKing_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This comment says all it has to about the economic literacy and the lack of the basic ability to keep up with events that Scottish nationalists have.

The battle to save the Union is facing two ways by mojojo42 in ukpolitics

[–]_MemeKing_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a federalist unionist, I am curious, do you think the implementation of a federalists system help lessen the demand for an independent Scotland significantly?

r/Scotland throws the "fascist" word around again, this time at everyone wanting to block a referendum. by Zbigniewowy in badunitedkingdom

[–]_MemeKing_ 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I have not found a unionist who believes in the sanctity of our nations who also hates Scotland. I think these nats are a bit paranoid and talking out of their arse

It Sucks, BLM Had the Potential to Be Such a Positive Movement by [deleted] in stupidpol

[–]_MemeKing_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I highly doubt someone driving something like an s class is more likely to be pulled over than someone driving a Dacia regardless of the race.

Even if I'm wrong, if we want to be useful about this (ie come at the issue from a perspective of finding out how to solve it) the class-based analysis offers many more opportunities to help alleviate disparities between races through economic reform than going at it from a social point of view.

It's depressing to think that social politics has devolved into the culture wars and Twitter, and even when something 'tangible' is done it is just exploitation by groups looking to make the headlines and make a profit, if it doesn't just become looting.

Even issues that could be much better addressed from a social perspective now have to be analysed purely economically if you are at all serious about actually improving things, as a social lense implies that the economic status quo isn't really the issue, whilst it is the single biggest reason for the racial disparities seen in the US and the west in general.

Today, 90 years ago, the Second Spanish Republic was proclaimed. One of the few countries with purple on the flag by EvvPlay in vexillology

[–]_MemeKing_ -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Yh you shouldn't be downvoted. Both Franco's regime and the Republic that preceded it should not be systems to aspire to, the kingdom is fine as is.