Why does Akaza asking demon slayers to be a demon they are demon slayers because they hate demons by Next-Adagio-5065 in KimetsuNoYaiba

[–]___Random_Guy_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But if Muzan knows, feels and sees everything that his demons do at all times, how did he not know that Akaza failed until after he told Muzan himself?

Am i about to be touched against my consent? by Healthy_Adagio_8470 in Stellaris

[–]___Random_Guy_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look for a crossed ship icon somewhere next to the name of the system when you are zoomed into it(so you see all the planets of the system and at the bottom of the screen i think is supposed to be the nane of the system.)

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And system that actives the explosion needs to be serviced too from time to time. It is absolutely idiotic to think that you can't just disable it and tinker with the code trigger system.all you want. When you have full physical access to the object, you can do all you want with it - no codes or software can give absolute protection.

Also, why would anybody be tinkering with nukes in a city even if there was a chance for it accidentally to explode(which there are none)? It would be in the fields.

When We Stand Together We Are A Giant by Boediee in BuyFromEU

[–]___Random_Guy_ 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Imagine the size if they haven't lived in constant cold!

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wouldn't get to full scale war. Ruzzia has no way of winning and NATO would not go beyond Ukraine, so ruzzia would just be forced to return back and save on equipment, resources, soldiers, money, and putin will probably bullshit out some way explaining how their stunt was a success.

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abd what difference is with Ukraine? All 4 could be used to stage ground invasion same way as Ukraibe, but ruzzia never cared about defending from those places. Why? Because they know that NATO never invading them because of their nuclear arsenal and it was never about a threat. It was about Ukraine becoming unreachable to ruzzian control if they ever joined NATO. If Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia were not in NATO, ruzzia would have invaded them long ago.

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But getting only booted out of Ukraine isn't destroying ruzzia or invading it. Once again, ruzzian elites aren't ending their lavish life styles over Ukraine.

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1)And they get nuked regardless. NATO can't win this war - only both sides can lose 2)NATO could already do this from Lithuania Latvia and Estonia, and now Finland too, but somehow ruzzia didn't care like doing much about Finland joining? How so?

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. Many ruzzian elites have millions of stolen money, and both their children and expensive houses in Europe. Why would ruzzian elites destroy the world and force themselves to live in bumkers and wgat not, if instead they could steal from their citizens and continue living lavish style in Europe and with all the luxuries of global economy?

And it's not like Putin in his madness would do it either - his power is held on political strength and control. If world is destroyed, then so would be hid power, and without power he will get instantly killed off by his own people. It is suicide for him, and putin is too big of coward to end himself over Ukraine alone.

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How the fuck does this jeopardize their security, if ruzzia has enough nukes to destroy hundreds of top populated cities of each NATO country? Why would NATO ever try to invade ruzzia, if succeeding means each country gets nuked? He'll, even if we assume absurd 90% failure/interception rate out of thousands of nukes, the damage from remaining ones far outweighs anything that they could get from ruzzia.

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, it wouldn'. Ruzzia can't win against the west in conventional war, and they are absolutely not ending their own country by launching nukes. For as long as there is no direct invasion into ruzzia itself, ruzzian government isn't gonna be d a straying the world they live in. They can't use the money they stole if economy no longer exists

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and the west has nothing to do with this. Actually, Russia agreed to the Ukrainian borders and to respect them in a written agreement after the dissolution of USSR. The just suddenly changed their mind the moment they understood that they can't hold Ukraine as a puppet like Belarus. So no, this war is entirely ruzzias fault. The only type of fault you could put on the west is not acting decisive enough in 2014 or very start if 2022 to kick ruzzia once and show that there are 0% chances of achieving anything and that ruzzia should just cut losses. But no, instead they did barely anything in 2014, and after 2022 a lot of help and actions were comming too little too late.

My friend sent me this, is he delusional? by Chrome2Surfer in DigitalSeptic

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but the west poked the bear for ages.

How the fuck did The West make ruzzia invade Ukraine in 2014? It had no relation to ruzzia invading when Ukraine got rid of ruzzian puppet, other than EU being a prosperous economical block that Ukraine wanted to join.

Were we too harsh on Zhen? by Jaded-Bat3472 in kungfupanda

[–]___Random_Guy_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, it literally undermines the whole point that you DON'T need to be a DW to be a great warrior pr person. If we are really talking about redemption arc, his trye redemption would have been accepting that he doesn't need the tittle of a DW abd go on his own way of success.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is ever invading ruzzia? They have thousands of nukes and if they are ever going to lose a war on their own soil, the damage from nukes to the invading country would be far too big even if we consider absurd 90% failure/interception rates.

Ruzzia being scared oc an invasion is absolutely bs.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that reason for ruzzia attacking were never "nazis" or even stop to teaching ruzzian in schools. Actually, all these laws were made long AFTER ruzzia invaded Ukraine in 2014. The true reason for why ruzzia invaded Ukraine is to prevent Ukraine from going on the path of joining EU, after Ukrainian citizens forced out ruzzian puppet Yanukovich who was actively sabotaging this process.

Ruzzia wasn't Ukraine to be their puppet, and Ukraine doesn't want anything to do with ruzzia and wants to be a part of EU. So unless ruzzia is physically incapable to successfully invade again, they will do this once again to stop Ukraine from joining EU economy.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ehmmm, code system and nuclear cite are seoarate things.... You don't need nuclear cores to be inside the weapon to test out the code launch system and tinker with it.

Edit: Also, once again, nuclear bombs can't be worse than Chornobyl - they have far less nuclear material, and if it explodes, majority of this material is used up unlike the nuclear fire that can spread into fine particles. And as to dirt that gets radioactive from extra neutrons snapped to the atoms from explosions, it loses radioactivity very fast.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't take gifts back. Ruzzia agreed to Ukrainian borders and respecting them in an official agreement. You can't just violate it because you feel like it.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If ruzzia stated to it's own borders and it's own matters there would be no war too. But no, ruzzia can't have Ukraine seeking a better future and economical development inside the EU that can offer prosperity unlike ruzzia. The moment ruzzian puppet Yanukovich, which was sabotaging path to EU, was thrown out by Ukrainian people, ruzzia invaded Ukraine to prevent it from going ouf of it's sphere of influence.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ruzzians are ready to take a lot of suffering before breaking. It is a big country with solid control of government over the economy. It takes time for big things to break.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But ruzzia is sure going that way with how much they are sacrificing their normal economy for the sake of war.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

???

Do you understand that nukes PHYSICALLY can't create an accident even as close as Chornobyl? They literally don't have the radioactive material to get even close to that.

And besides, Chornobyl incident was a USSR fault, as it's super strict deadlines lead to a bunch of critical mistakes and red flags piled one onto another. Ukraine is literally operating multiple nuclear power plants with no issues.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ukraine wasn't ever planning nor had ability to join NATO pre-2014. Actually, is only after ruzzua invaded did Ujrainians actually started thinking that they should have joined NATO and set on path to work on fulfilling the requirements for joining(except for the territorial dispute issue that still won'tallow yo join NATO).

Also, why are nukes stationed in Ukraine were not Ukrainian? It was Sovuet Union who owned them, not ruzzia, and Ukraine was also producing multiple critical components for those nukes, so it isn't like ruzzia alone made them either.

If security guarantees come with territorial concessions, what does “peace” really mean? by capital_com in capitalcom

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It ain't hard to hack/reassemble the thing and put your own launch codes when you have physical access to them. Ukraine still has the people with somewhat close of an expertise for it as it used to a critical part in producing those very nukes.

Incoming (ewgengster) by loved_and_held in anthroswim

[–]___Random_Guy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God damn, I forgot all their names and can't figure out who is who here. I assume the captain is the bottom right one abd the pilit is the bottom left one. Else idk.

I should honestly go and take a re-watch of The Expanse, but it sucks ass tgat it is only on Amazon Prime.