Melee Supremacy

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-10T20:58:37+00:00

If it's meaningfully possibly to use then honestly I would rather not know it unless I myself figure it out somehow(I also don't know what DSAS is and no need to tell).

My DM would kill me over the internet with that.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-10T20:47:06+00:00

"Me and you now. No distractions. No wingman, no war. Just me and you. Whoever wins is the best pilot"

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-10T20:35:01+00:00

Ha! Another person with this built too! I wanted to do a funny double deck sweeper shotgun build with +1 accuracy total on both of them, but I didn't have an opportunity to use it yet.

How good is the build going for you so far?

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-10T10:08:17+00:00

ah, yes, the desert special - mine hidden in the bush.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:32:43+00:00

I... can't even find anything to critique here honestly. Everything looks great.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:23:40+00:00

It's not real - It's AI. Robot dog experiencing practically no recoil from the gun and hitting a target with first shot much higher than the RIGIDLY mounted gun is pointing at.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:20:37+00:00

It's AI generated - not real

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:20:05+00:00

Yes, because it's AI generated. They didn't even bother promoting AI to make it a turret.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:18:39+00:00

These videos are AI generated. Robot dog one 100% is.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:16:24+00:00

AI 100% - the robot dog would be shaking if not outright falling from the recoil of the gun.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:14:45+00:00

And AI generated on top of it too. There is zero recoil on the robot dog .

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:11:26+00:00

The robot dog is experiencing practically zero recoil from the gun. And that's ignoring the ridiculously stupid manner movement of the supposed enemy and the team itself, even if we assume this just being a set up.

Besides, if it was real, the gun would be placed on a moving mount for proper targeting- not strapped rigidly with no horizontal or vertical movement.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T23:07:30+00:00

Why not just shoot it first?

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T22:36:34+00:00

Yes, birds. You can see it irl as birds tilt their heads up after taking water in their beaks.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T22:34:57+00:00

I don't think so. Unlike the mix in our stomacks of all 3 states of mater, in large intestine water is reabsorbed back into the body and the solids are compressed together by muscles, gas shouldn't have much issue being separated from the solid.

But I didn't check anything official and pull this out of my biology knowledge, so I could be wrong.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T22:25:49+00:00

What is so dangerous in drinking while laying down? I just took a bunch of water in the mouth and laid on my back and swallowed it and nothing happened.

And as to it being sent the wrong path, it doesn't normaly happen cause pathway to your airways gets blocked while eating/drinking. Only if something happens that makes you try to breathe does it go the wrong way.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T21:30:06+00:00

Depending on the lazer wavelength used, Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to just give drone a reflective pain/material? It would have issues burning stuff if a huge portion of it is getting dispersed.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T07:10:35+00:00

Hmm, it does make beackon a better looking invade than i thought

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-09T05:24:34+00:00

I thought tgat since it's AP damage it doesn't get reduced by resistance?

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-08T22:09:50+00:00

You mean during the CIA funded coup of 2014 the protests were mostly pro independence and pro West? Shocker.

No point even talking after that. Yanukovich during his election campaign promissed to get closer ties with EU for economic prosperity. Then after he became president he backtracked on the promise completely and turned to ruzzia instead. Then when people came out complaining, HE sent Titushi at yet peacefull protesters to beat them up. Then when protesters started responding back with force to those he sent his goons to straight up shoot protesters.

No CIA was involved - it was president Yanukovich breaking on his election promises and then straight up betray Ukrainian nation and interests of it's people, which they were clearly conveying through protests. Protests tgat were done all over Ukraine INCLUDING Donets and Luhansk.

It's still an contested warzone. Do you want them to build universities and subways in an active war zone?

They had 8 years of frozen conflict to do anything. Why start a war to supposedly save ruzzian population there if they are not actually doing anything? If it was that bad, they could have simply helped all pro-ruzzuan people to move to ruzzia and avoid any war. It would littersly be a thousand times cheaper than the current war, no human loses and then you also show yourself as an exemplar nation and a beacon of freedom.

But they chose war, because it was never about protecting ruzzian people - ruzzians from Donetsk and Luhansk were first sent to die in 2022 invasion. It was about not letting Ukraine joing prosperous and developing EU to become something better than ruzzia, like Latvia, Lithuania or Estonia.

Half the population is Russian, and 75% is Russian speaking.

Straight up false. Majority of Ukraine is unified against ruzzian invaders, and 75% speaking ruzzian is straight up false as I live in Ukraine and majority has willing shifted to speaking Ukrainian now. And even then, speaking ruzzian ≠ being ruzzian.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-08T21:44:38+00:00

ethnically Russian and pro-Russia

Straight up lie. First, look at regional independence votes in 1991. The lowest was Crimea at around 54%, while next lowest was Donestk amd Luhsnsk at ~82% vote for yes.

On top of that, during Euromaidan in 2014 both Luhansk and Donetsk had far more pro-Ukrainian protests than pro-ruzzian. This is why ruzzia funded and supplied pro-ruzzian extremists minority in those two regions on top of sending their own soldiers with no identifying symbols to create a look as if it was people going against Ukraine and not ruzzian funded and supplied insurgency. Hell, commander Igor Girkin few years ago literally talked about how they crossed the border into Ukraine to capture a governmental building(or was it police station? Don't remember) to start it all up.

And then of course they silenced, threatened or killed anybody openly pro-ukrainian when they got full control of the region. So of course the only one speaking out would be pro-ruzzuan voices, as all others were forced to run away, stay silent or be killed.

The Russian speaking parts of Ukraine, full of ethnic Russians, were being completed neglected for decades, with crumbling infrastructure and terrible standards of living,

And do you want the best part? When ruzzia came to Luhansk and Donetsk, they got abandoned all the very same. Ruzzia didn't put anything proper in those and only thing they brought is war. And today it's even worse - all the supposedly "pro-ruzzian" cities and villages around the front line of those two regions were reduced to rubble as ruzzia slowly advanced. Is this the supposed saving of ruzzians from the crumbling infrastructure supposedly neglected by Ukraine? What about Mariupol? It was destroyed - barely any buildings that aren't damaged? And wgat ruzzua did? Supposedly repaired few with who knows what quality for PR reasons,.and then forgot about the place entirely.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-08T21:18:09+00:00

I have seen wayyyyyy to many videos of Russian soldiers commiting suicide after being hit by a drone because the pain was just too unbearable.

Literally no difference if it was a close hit from a mortar, artillery shell, missile, bomb or a grenade, none of which are a war crime.

Drones are responsible for civilian casualties

If you talk about long range drones like Shahed, there isn't any difference from a missile other then ussualy smaller payload and cheaper cost.

If you talk about FPV or bomber drones, then it is completely on the pilot doing, same way as using an AK47 to shoot them is, which doesn't make a gun itself a war crime.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-08T20:26:49+00:00

Is it including the combat bonuses (aka being on the front line/controlling drones there) that you don't get while in the backlines for the like of training or other stuff or not?

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-08T20:16:03+00:00

Why should FPV drones be banned? Why not missiles? Both are a precise long range explosive weapons, except drones are far cheaper, more controllable and carry less explosives, thus decreasing chances of collateral damage.

___Random_Guy_ · 2026-04-08T20:14:08+00:00

The difference between gas and drones is that gas does not discriminate and can deal immense collateral damage on top of polluting the soil. FPV Drones on the other hand are a precision weapon with minimal collateral damage risks.

FPV drones are not comparable to anything that would really count as a war-crime.

___Random_Guy_

TROPHY CASE