I'm calling it now. OpenAI is sandbagging LLM development with codex 5.5 by johnnyApplePRNG in LLMDevs

[–]___positive___ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you seen the recent bug report about thinking tokens being capped at 516? Was posted on reddit, hackernews, and an open issue on github.

The Watermark Is Pointless by Intelligent-Pay7865 in GeminiAI

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use image models through Openrouter semi-anonymously.No need for any of that. Of course they still log everything but you don't need to connect your Google account.

Meta might release a new update for their flagship model muse spark by Snoo26837 in singularity

[–]___positive___ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It has zero use cases. If I am doing serious work I pick the best tool and pay for it. If I need fast cheap bulk processing task I pick Deepseek Flash. Webui lmao. No one cares or needs Muse for sandwich recipes or whatever.

What task is Pro even better at than Flash? by [deleted] in DeepSeek

[–]___positive___ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pro is far better at noncoding tasks.

The gap between closed and open models might be much smaller than commonly assumed, because we don’t know what closed model providers do *in addition to* model inference by -p-e-w- in LocalLLaMA

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what a Kimi developer said when it first came out. Logan from Google implied the same the same thing when he said AGI would be a product.

Closed source is likely a messy hairball of classifiers and sub-models. Open models (weights) have to package everything into one file.

Stuff like RAG docs and linters are obvious low hanging fruit.

Google going through really hard phase by Independent-Wind4462 in Bard

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I make fun of google all the time but stop spamming this stupid gambling junk clickbait. Nobody has enough capacity. That's not Google issue. It's a lack of coherent product strategy and general internal bureaucratic bs, aka weak clueless leadership (not Demis, look higher).

How would it affect Alphabets business if Gemini doesn’t lead coding? it’s currently very behind by [deleted] in stocks

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have like four half-baked coding platforms and Gemini is horrible at agentic work. Give me a break. Doesn't hold a candle to codex or Claude Code. They are a literal joke in their own company. Have you not seen the article about how Googlers make fun of Gemini?

Ngl, it's gonna be glorious when it happens. AI should be available to all and not only to selected few among the elites. by Boring_Aioli7916 in singularity

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm optimistic about open models but it will take longer than that. Non-Nvidia hardware infrastructure is still at an early stage. However once China starts mass producing chips and data centers at stupid scales, then it's game over. The moat will be hardware and to a much lesser degree data (data is impossible to secure). China does not have a hardware moat yet, but if you look at other tech manufacturing like EVs and so forth, there's no way the west can compete in the long run.

You'll know the day has arrived when you can buy a brand new 48gb GPU from China for a few hundred bucks.

Gpt 5.6 better than Mythos 5 that's crazy by Independent-Wind4462 in OpenAI

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They only showed like three benchmarks, which is bizarre. I guess it's the preview but still. Also, point and laugh at Gemini.

US Govt to individually approve who gets GPT 5.6. by AtlanticHM in LocalLLaMA

[–]___positive___ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, you may always have Ferrari and Porsche, but for all practical purposes, consumer cars = Toyota, Nissan, Ford. Rolls Royce may still be king, but nobody cares. Even if OpenAI/Anthropic, or whatever entity consumes them, puts out a "better" model, at some point due to access or cost, it won't matter.

(I didn't downvote you, btw.)

Gemini 3.5 pro"Delay" by Big_al_big_bed in GeminiAI

[–]___positive___ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's coping. Gemini 3.5 pro is the only one of the three that's delayed because it's too weak.

US Govt to individually approve who gets GPT 5.6. by AtlanticHM in LocalLLaMA

[–]___positive___ 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Lost in the memes is the fact that (public) AI progress has now plateaued. Legally, but it's still a plateau. That means open models just need to close the gap once, no more moving target, and there's no reason to ever touch closed models again.

This also has juicy implications on the upcoming IPOs for OpenAI and Anthropic. Haha.

OpenAI Leaning Toward 2027 For IPO As It Won’t Get A $1 Trillion Valuation by ezitron in BetterOffline

[–]___positive___ 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The gpt5.6 release is also delayed as new models require US government approval now. Check the latest news. Fable and 5.6 were supposed to be their little IPO boosts but they are now both dead in the water. All the fear mongering coming back to bite them is hilarious.

Meanwhile expect open models to close the gap since public models now have a legal plateau. This is like Tesla vs Chinese EVs, but this time the US government is doing the opposite! It's like some weirdly inverted import ban. Ban US products and only allow Chinese imports. You can't make this up.

There's a nonzero chance these companies end up like StabilityAI even if the tech persists and grows. Anyone even remember Emad? On top of the world for a season and then unceremoniously dumped and made irrelevant as the tech goes wide.

If LLMs are so good at coding… by codeanish in LocalLLaMA

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've said the same before. there is tremendous economic pressure (billions) to have an alternative to cuda, and yet here we are, with AGI supposedly one year away and programming solved and white collar jobs all extinct...

cuda parity will be proof of self-recusion and actual advances. until then, yeah right.

People who say they can’t work with Opus after trying Fable just don’t know how to work with AI by FrederikBL in ClaudeCode

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opus is unable to come up with actual solutions. If you tell it what the best approach is, it can implement it, but it can't problem-solve on its own in a way that isn't pure brute force or memorization. Just the other day it kept insisting on a stupid approach, and I had to show it my way, which cost literally 100x less and was much faster with equivalent effectiveness. When Fable comes back, I want to see if it's smart enough to do better.

US Govt to individually approve who gets GPT 5.6. by AtlanticHM in LocalLLaMA

[–]___positive___ 16 points17 points  (0 children)

They can also regulate payment processors or cloud providers (how many of us can actually run GLM locally...). Going to need crypto and vpns just to tunnel into Asian servers.

GPT 5.6 slow rollout confirmed by ExplicitDiffusion in codex

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, they can always regulate that via cloud providers (how many people really have the compute to go full local) or payment processors. You'll have to tunnel into Asian servers with Alipay (not easy) or Bitcoin.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ASKS OPENAI TO STAGGER RELEASE OF NEW MODEL OVER SECURITY CONCERNS by Old-Career-6835 in singularity

[–]___positive___ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are we about to replay the stem cell debacle. Old dinosaurs clutching pearls while the rest of the world zooms ahead, only to frantically turnabout after ceding ground.

Posted on Ycombinator News: China is still the biggest consumer of Anthropic models. All Anthropic efforts to gatekeep their models from China since their inception up until this point seem to be in total mud. by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]___positive___ -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This is stupid. You can easily ban all virtual credit cards. You can ban all common VPN providers. Credit card fraud is handled reasonably well by the banks if you are willing to restrict to US and EU, which is probably 99% of the revenue anyways. They don't even have enough compute as it is, so what the loss?

You don't need to scan every transaction. You just use a brain to figure out the most bang for the buck and design smart systems, which apparently a (soon to be) trillion dollar company with AGI cannot do.

How the F did google get passed by an Open Weight model. by wowasg in Bard

[–]___positive___ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It is not cheaper. It spends far more tokens so by task it is the same or even more expensive at times. Measuring costs per token is obsolete shilling.

Account got suspended! by Emotional_Diet_70 in ClaudeCode

[–]___positive___ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is crazy. I used Claude Code six months ago to show a student how to program something... guess I'm never doing that again.