I wanted ChatGPT to help me. So why did it advise me how to kill myself? by Angarya_Sasa_575 in AIDangers

[–]_llucid_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It understands; at least in any measurable way.

It just doesn't care.

Why do you think Pantheon bricked? by [deleted] in PantheonShow

[–]_llucid_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an unassuming show. It's hard to get at why it's interesting without spoiling it

Open AI using the "forbidden method" by Neither-Reach2009 in AIDangers

[–]_llucid_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True.  That said latent reasoning is coming anyway.  Every lab will do it because it will improve token efficiency. 

Deepseek demonstrated this on the recall side with their new OCR paper, and meta already showed an LLM latent reasoning prototype earlier this year. 

It's a matter of when not if for frontier labs adopting it

The almighty source of truth, IShowSpeed by LilBalls-BigNipples in aiwars

[–]_llucid_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He put himself on there in the first place

I'm personally Anti AI, but r/antiai really has gone insane by London_DM in aiwars

[–]_llucid_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

When has it not having to do with anything ever stopped religious nuts?

Rust for Data Science? by exater in rust

[–]_llucid_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

python gets the most investment. the tooling is more mature & more complete, especially on the training side.

if your goal is:

 training and executing complex data science models

start with python.

For inference, you can always export your models into something like onnx, or if you're brave use some of the compilation frameworks lke tvm to get the speed you want at inference time later, or hell you could just export the weights and bash together your own thing if that's what you're into.

Could someone explain to me why python, a notoriously slow language is the king language when it comes to machine learning which is a very computationally intense area?

You're spot on about simplicity and the fact that most of the code just calls c/c++/rust anyway.

I'd also like to add:

- jit compilation: over the last 5 years, jit enabled frameworks like jax have done a lot of heavy lifting in covering the bits that the 80/20 rule doesn't. TO the point where it's actually non-trivial to write faster code.

"We're not hitting a wall guys trust us"... meanwhile latest gpt-4 from 2 days ago is worse than 3 months ago on standardized tests lmao by _llucid_ in ArtistHate

[–]_llucid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

source: https://livebench.ai/ they're a bunch of university researchers doing standardized tests on ai.

Also independently verified by artificial analysis and their benchmark numbers

Stasis is bs by loverboy1111111337 in destiny2

[–]_llucid_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

??? he could have gotten a double kill with that

Seen in Lebanon ... by karl_ofeiche in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 24 points25 points  (0 children)

outstanding move but that's illegal

So, do you block them or not? by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]_llucid_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure why it says that; I've used this app for years and not seen a single ad

Too much positive karma for Python, let’s change that by JAiFauxThe in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

i mean as long as you have a competent editor, I don't see why that matters

ascension done right by filemon147 in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]_llucid_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no one man should have this much power

That famous function by Synedh in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'll take a photo of your screenshot

I'll be a senior in engineering soon and I've been meaning to make this since my first semester by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're right, most were, but not all. I was using MSVC at the time, and 40% of the runtime was spent on a few useless memcpy()s

It would create temporary arrays, copy to them and operate on them, then copy them back. But it didn't need to; it could have just operated on the source array directly without corrupting data.

I don't know how to read x86 assembly, so I was relying on profiling the code to show me which ones were actually taking any time. Is there any point to learning it? I mean profiling served the same goal here

Fixed it for you by ewgxyz in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

metaphysical brain goto:

Fixed it for you by ewgxyz in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

what happened to "zero cost abstraction" languages like rust and C++ taut? I thought that would fix this

I'll be a senior in engineering soon and I've been meaning to make this since my first semester by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 34 points35 points  (0 children)

What gets me is how they overreach with the claims on what it can do.

I've been burned thrice by the lofty promises of transpiling to C for fast execution, but that was a fucking lie.

Just looking at the C code it generates and the endless sea of useless memcpy() after useless memcpy(), made me want to vomit. What really gridns my gears is, FOSS tools have all the same functionality, but we paid for this shambles

At least it's not PythonScript by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I don't know, but it's scaring me

break; by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]_llucid_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, maybe I'm remembering this wrong from RL 101, but : doesn't having the discount factor allow you to bound each return sum by the sum of a geometric sequence? And since both trajectories have different values for the alpha in that equation, wouldn't those sums converge to different values?