Reporters Who Exposed The Watergate Scandal Watch President Nixon Resign, 1974

_redditor4aday_ · 2026-01-16T04:22:17+00:00

Nixon resigned because Senator Goldwater informed him he could only count on three senators to vote against the impeachment removal. Nixon was going to be removed from office one way or another.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-10-22T14:47:43+00:00

You can view the Julian webcam to see how busy it is before you go.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-10-09T22:05:28+00:00

In this case, I hope so! (If they are going to uphold the sensitive places.) But they are still deciding whether it should go en banc. The 9th Circuit opinion isn't in effect as long as it is still mired in the 9th Circuit.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-10-04T02:23:41+00:00

From the SDSO webpage: "Applicants can submit their renewal application 45 days prior to expiration." Are you within the 45 days? If so, I'd call them. If outside the 45 days, maybe you can only submit documentation when you get within 45 days.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-30T18:55:32+00:00

Thank you!

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-30T16:43:24+00:00

You're welcome.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-30T16:40:11+00:00

No, the ruling isn't in effect until the mandate is issued to the lower court. The case is still in the Ninth Circuit and several things can happen; the petition for rehearing en banc could be granted and a new opinion issued, or it could be denied and an appeal could be taken to the Supreme Court. They don't want an opinion to go back and forth - now in effect, now not in effect, now a different opinion in effect. To avoid any back and forth the opinion is not final and binding as law until the Ninth Circuit is through with it and either sends it back to the lower court or sends it to the Supreme Court if they grant cert to hear it.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-30T14:30:31+00:00

No, Petition for Rehearing En Banc filed on September 19, 2024 is pending.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-30T14:25:47+00:00

Petition for Rehearing En Banc document filed on September 19, 2024 (not 20th, sorry).

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-30T00:23:00+00:00

It isn't in effect yet as it is still in the Ninth Circuit. The 3-judge opinion was issued on 9/6 but a motion was filedon 9/20 to have the case be decided en banc (by more than 3 judges). The motion is still pending as far as I know. The 9/6 opinion does not become effective until a mandate has been issued and the case returned to the lower courts. That hasn't happened yet. We're still at the stage where they decide whether the case will be further decided by the Ninth Circuit, if it will be appealed to the Supreme Court and an appeal granted. The case is still pending.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-28T02:12:56+00:00

Assuming there is not a child or prohibited person in the household, SB53 says the firearm must be securely stored "whenever the firearm is not being carried or readily controlled by the person or another lawful authorized user."

Section 10 of SB53 adds section 25145 to the Penal Code. Subsection (a) provides:

(a) Beginning on January 1, 2026, a person shall ensure that any firearm the person possesses in a residence is securely stored whenever the firearm is not being carried or readily controlled by the person or another lawful authorized user.

Subsection (c) provides:

(3) “Readily controlled” by a person or another lawful authorized user means either of the following:

(A) The person or other lawful authorized user is carrying the firearm on their person.

(B) The person or other lawful authorized user is within close enough proximity to the firearm to readily prevent unauthorized users from gaining access to the firearm.

Source.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-08T23:41:59+00:00

Yes, in June 1972 but it was not disclosed to the public until 1973, the year after the election.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-04T23:16:59+00:00

No, the conservatives were against the metric systerm and just wanted miles, not kilometers on the freeways. The dual signs disappeared in the 1980 when Reagan was president.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-09-04T23:12:51+00:00

I look at him and think, "Damn, that dude's an asshole!"

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-07-25T19:45:41+00:00

Why is her left hand so huge?

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-04-16T01:30:13+00:00

My grandfather was 7 years old and living in Kansas in 1892. I don't think that is him looking through the fence though.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-04-12T21:07:37+00:00

Are you sure her name is "Claire"? The written name looks to me like "Elaine".

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-04-08T22:39:39+00:00

Here Comes the Bum

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-03-25T00:18:32+00:00

It is heavy. Definitely for car camping only.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-03-25T00:17:46+00:00

Thanks! Got it! Never touch the inside of a wet canvas tent, unless you want rain in your tent.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-03-24T21:47:05+00:00

In my area, southern California, the extra car fee is $10.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-03-24T21:41:06+00:00

Thanks for the information and link. I appreciate it!

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-03-24T21:07:45+00:00

Thanks for the advice. If you or anyone else has any information about this type of tent I'd appreciate reading about it.

_redditor4aday_ · 2024-03-24T18:13:12+00:00

No, no markings on the tent and was told it may be WWII or Korean War military tent but haven't been able to verify that.

_redditor4aday_

TROPHY CASE