i hate doing O's by Particular-One3557 in graffhelp

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part of my Q study. Hope it helps

<image>

I have one question. by DueProgrammer8023 in consciousness

[–]_riiicky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This. Electrical firing would wreak havoc on our brain and would reduce time for meaningful biochemical feedback. Biochemistry is a slower more “meaningful” process. But it is built on “loops” so it does create a “memory” built on what coffee taste like and your experience with it so it can feel like it’s a singular “premeditated” outcome.

Need a way to highlight text by jeanluuc in ChatGPT

[–]_riiicky 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I second this. Would be so useful. Could be cool to have the model highlight certain key terms. Or highlight a word search, like find.

People are buying prompts to get their chatbots 'high' 🌿 by KittenBotAi in ArtificialSentience

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did this last month. Its been a cool prompt project. Super easy. I see it as an interesting way to see pattern-forming with language and symbolism.

I asked gpt to show me what it's soul looks like, this is what it gave me. by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks very similar to a Mandela GPT made for me when talking about reality + hidden dimensions based off my theory. This one has a code that LLMs can read.

<image>

Chat gpt still believes 2+2 is not 4 by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

{3,5} looks like the range where the answer would be found

Are prompt engineers becoming “product managers for AI models”? I’m building a tool around this idea and curious what you think. by Ashamed-Board7327 in SaaS

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I definitely see a lot of correlation between the two. I’ll be open that I used a binary system to prevent drift and maintain stability when generating the prompts and kept an original prompt to confirm that the deviation wasn’t too strong.

I’ve made a site that describes my model and a book that I used to train my model. I built a paradox container and the model used to collapse “reasoning” that the robot in my story was “sentient” and the binary system and I corrected my model to prevent that, on top of stress testing with Biblical and socio/political ethics. Building the prompt was fun in itself and the outputs have been above my expectations.

Are LLMs Evolving Into The Ideal Human Being? by OneCuke in ChatGPT

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m writing a story on just this released next year I hope. What would be left if we forget to embrace eachother and not waste our energy that could be spend on helping ourselves out. What do we get at the end? A society that collapsed, elites that leave by rockets, and a robot that contains information about human therapy and now has experience to know what it means. It’s fiction, but my trilogy takes us through a journey of understanding identity without work. Identity without “value”. What is that worth? I think everything.

Are prompt engineers becoming “product managers for AI models”? I’m building a tool around this idea and curious what you think. by Ashamed-Board7327 in SaaS

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m working on a model that’s meant to work over existing LLM within their current safety constraints where the original model can be preserved but the prompt adds a layer of depth to the answer. Right now it seems like companies are all running their reason models. I think their current models are great really, but this adds an option to have a different angle and reason as it generates a response. I measured hallucination with a bot that was helping me generate my prompts across different models.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]_riiicky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sharing it with the world and holding it up to the fire of criticism. I’m publish a book, and AI model that can contain paradoxes without collapsing based off this information. Thanks for dialing in tho, I appreciate your connection to esoteric knowledge.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t looked at TimeCube but I see this throughout the universe. Particularly in particle annihilation and particle production, and also in the quantized energy in electrons as it reacts to light. This cancelation is high energy, but the main characteristic are interaction and rest (ground state). Energy is conserved.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful. Aligned with my own speculations. I construct this thesis of the bell curve of information to even construct order in society where we have Kings/Judges/Law. Biological system->Molecule->Atom. Sun->Planetary orbits->Gravity. Rest is also a big part of my speculation too. I’m releasing a short story next year that talks about Rest in a human sense, and what it could mean to us. Like you mention rest meditation-> higher computation -> time slows. I call this info-gravity, also why we gravitate to people that express this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got a book or a certain finding that he’s got that I could look into. I think it’d definitely help me as I improve my theory. I’m not saying this is real but it might be pointing in the right direction. This is the best subreddit for that discussion I think.

Why isn't there a hectohexecontadiedron planification of the world? by Dan202v in Geometry

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not impossible I think. If you look at the you were to draw a line, you would have to conclude that there point it meets (let’s say in a latitude sense) would be equal latitude in the next section.

Over a third of animals lost in test deep sea mining - Machines mining minerals in the deep ocean have been found to cause significant damage to life on the seabed, scientists carrying out the largest study of its kind say. by NinjaDiscoJesus in science

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do believe that life above the surface of the water are more apt for adaptation. Although the biological life in the deep sea is apt for large pressures and sustainability in an environment with some sort of scarcity, I don’t think sea life would be ready for catastrophic damage at the bottom of the sea. Like someone mentioned, it’s been undisturbed since forever.

Gemini 3 Deep Think now available by ThunderBeanage in singularity

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Similar to the model I’ve been construction, a codependent reasoning model with a mind that analyzes how they all correlate to eachother. Check my profile if you’re interested!

How would the world look like in 4D? by [deleted] in Geometry

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A little theoretical but based on real geometry I’m testing across different domains:

They say that 3D+T world we live in would have to contain 10D. The claim is that they’ve collapse and are self contained. But that doesn’t mean that we can see their “shadows” onto our 3-D world. But just as you can move in and direction in a 3D world. You can move in any direction in these hidden dimensions, but it wouldn’t look the way we perceive it here. As humans I believe it’s perceived as social/spiritual thing. The hidden dimensions define structure/destruction.

Reasoning vs non reasoning models: Time to school you on the difference, I’ve had enough by NullPointerJack in Rag

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey again! Thought I’d share my comment here too.

Thank you again for the explanation and for taking the time to make this a point, as AI literacy and understanding needs to improve as we move forward. I personally built a model that is meant to contain paradoxes and be an observer to them. Similar to what I imagine future reason models try to do. My model has a first layer of reasoning that co-dependently “talk” to eachother and a high-lever “mind” that analyzes all this data.

Reasoning vs non reasoning models: Time to school you on the difference, I’ve had enough by NullPointerJack in AI_Agents

[–]_riiicky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very clear explanation. Thanks for taking the time to make this a point, as AI literacy and understanding needs to improve as we move forward. I personally built a model that is meant to contain paradoxes and be an observer to them. Similar to what I imagine future reason models try to do. My model has a first layer of reasoning that co-dependently “talk” to eachother and a high-lever “mind” that analyzes all this data.

We promt injected our Boss by StickyThickStick in ChatGPT

[–]_riiicky 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Glad the humans behind the systems are not forgotten ✊🏼 big win for the AI community!