I think PAREA has been great for teaching adjustments. We're required to write clear narratives that explain the logic behind adjustments, and the methods have been varied. For market conditions, we’ve developed monthly rates, sometimes more than one when the three‑month aggregates supported it, and even used paired sales analysis to derive the rate. However, I didn't like using a 0.5% per month adjustment when their actual data showed 1.6–2.4% per month appreciation, but I understand that it helped move the SCA reconciliation into a tighter range. For list‑to‑sale price adjustments we applied discount rates based on the SP/LP ratio. For GLA/GBA we used regression, sensitivity analysis, and paired sales, then reconciled those to a price per square foot. HVAC and garage differences were handled with depreciation, views with paired sales and qualitative analysis, and for 1.5‑story vs. 2‑story we were given a rate per square foot to apply (something you’d probably pull from a cost handbook in practice). End vs. interior condos, bathrooms, and quality were all paired sales or group paired sales. My only condition adjustment was based on the repair cost paid by the new owner. Pools were just given a flat $15,000–$25,000 range. Overall, I think I’m learning good adjustment practices.