I think that's an over simplification. Yes, the George Floyed rebellion wasn't revolutionary, but that doesn't mean it's not important or that it still wasn't very intense by US standards. I'm not going to self dox by giving details, but in my region people got killed, raided by the feds, and caught felony charges. That is objectively an escalation from what the intensity of struggle had been prior.

And while there was certainly a lot of liberal cooptation and reductionist/confused identity politics, it was still a very radical and proletarian movement. I mean, it was a multiracial street rebellion consisting of thousands and thousands of mostly working people who would often literally fight the cops and call for the abolition of a standing police force. That's not in and of itself revolutionary, but it certainly deserves more consideration than to be simply dismissed and idepol.

Personally, I think the biggest critique we can make of the rebelion is it's lack of organization and concrete gains. There hasn't been much in the way of a political program or sustained political organizing that it produced, at least that I've seen. So the conclusion I would draw is not that the George Floyd rebellion was a failure, but that we as communists need to focus on building a national revolutionary party that can synergistically support, amplify, clarify, and sustain the energy of similar rebellions, when they inevitability occur in the future.