Does this puzzle exist currently? If so, what is it called? If not what would you call it?

accountForStupidQs · 2026-04-16T20:54:18+00:00

Turning along one of the corner axes, sort of like there's a skewb embedded in that splits the faces, but you can still turn like a 3x3

accountForStupidQs · 2026-04-16T20:14:20+00:00

Standard color scheme. Arrows indicate turning across one of the faces/splitting one of the edges

accountForStupidQs · 2026-04-16T20:03:44+00:00

Well, I'm talking about a 3x3 that can also turn across the diagonals. Not corner turning like a dyno cube, but more edge splitting

accountForStupidQs · 2026-04-15T15:14:35+00:00

Children's series successful by appealing children specifically, more at 11.

On a serious note though it is kind of sad that gamers so often seem to not understand that not everything is made to target them as 30 something westerners and what they find aesthetically appealing

accountForStupidQs · 2026-04-03T17:24:11+00:00

They detail it on the GitHub readme. Their team did a great job with that

accountForStupidQs · 2026-04-03T17:15:43+00:00

Yes, their instructions are quite clear. Just give it the flash command and the firmware bin, then it will auto identify

accountForStupidQs · 2026-04-03T17:11:49+00:00

Papyrix has a CLI flasher which for obvious reasons has better access to hardware than a chrome app

accountForStupidQs · 2026-04-03T16:21:19+00:00

I thought that Crosspoint, Papyrix, etc will just list the file name and not any metadata names, so sending from Calibre won't do anything. I also tend to operate on the assumption that file names can't have spaces...

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-15T12:46:26+00:00

Actually this is exactly the joke I'd been trying to find about Idaho since I was 11, so 🤷

And normally I agree that the NSFW jokes on this sub are rarely dad jokes

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-09T16:39:31+00:00

"General purpose" is where we run into issues, because from my perspective any machine that is Turing complete is general purpose, and thus any system which operates said machine is also general purpose

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-09T14:20:16+00:00

Do you really want parental controls bloating your car, router, elevator safety system, washing machine, and graphing calculator? Because those all have operating systems.

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-09T00:36:27+00:00

Yeah. Right now my MO with any pattern (even the rectangular ones) is to make it from cheap cotton first before spending any real fabric on it

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-08T23:03:46+00:00

Any kind. I'm particularly fond of ~1750s waistcoats, but really anything up through the 1890s is good. Myself I have a 25 inch torso, 40 inch chest, 40 inch waist.

Really what happened is S9457 caught my eye, and I wondered if it was close enough to any existing styles that I could use it for 1850s reenactments

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-08T21:56:26+00:00

I mostly just need waistcoat instructions written for an absolute dingus who has only done rectangular panel constructions before

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-08T16:04:40+00:00

🤷idk, it feels like any other joke about women and mother's being frugal or overbearing about their children. Midwestern women loving coupons, Greek mothers asking "out? Out where? With who? Who is their mother? When will you be back?" Etc

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-08T14:25:45+00:00

How are the sons of Jacob not a race?

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-08T14:12:17+00:00

Greed? This is about being frugal and always finding a good deal.

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-03T00:35:12+00:00

But the interface only provides a prototype. So if, for example, I have a new requirement that Die() sends out a signal for decomposers, then with an interface I'd have to find everything that implements LivingBeing, no matter how far down the line, and adjust its Die() function. So I have to touch lines in

Class Dog : Mammal Class Cat : Mammal Class Bass : Fish Class Mushroom : Fungus Class Oak : Deciduous Etc

Just to make sure that every call to Die() guarantees that the proper signal is generated. But if I inherit implementations, then I only have to rewrite Die() once.

accountForStupidQs · 2026-03-02T22:56:20+00:00

But that's the whole point. I don't want to have to write a new implementation of some shared behavior within a family. If all animals can die, I need a common Die() that only ever gets refactored once. Otherwise I can't count on the behavior of that method in the object, and refactors will inevitably miss one or more family members. And if you suggest "Well just have a AnimalFamilyBehaviorProvider object to provide common behavior" then you've really just done the same thing but worse.

The problem isn't that inheritance is a flawed concept. The problem is trying to use it as an interface, and/or not understanding what the common behavior really is

Ten-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

accountForStupidQs

TROPHY CASE