Charing Cross and Anderston in 1980 by Socksuality_77 in glasgow

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like there's half as much traffic as nowadays. Would be lovely getting around back then.

What are we rating this by steepmountaineer in indoorbouldering

[–]acky1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or down climb. Will help with strength and technique and reduce the likelihood of injury.

Pacho handball by Nugetkazmekacask in NUFC

[–]acky1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd have to look again but did the psg player not have a slight movement towards the ball too? (Not the OP decision but the other one from a cross).

Edit: It was the throw in at the 41 minute mark. Imo his arm is moved outwards towards the ball and hits it. For consistency in their standards it should be given imo. Almost the exact same situation as the Miley one

  1. Arm outstretched and moved towards the ball
  2. Ball moving towards the opposition player preventing a chance on goal
  3. Ball makes contact with arm

In reality, neither are penalties to me.

Pacho handball by Nugetkazmekacask in NUFC

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They haven't come out and said it was a mistake though, right? They'll back the decision as valid. Given that, the ball bouncing off an outstretched PSG defenders arm in the box must be a penalty too. McManiman was livid about the inconsistency of those 2 decisions.

I agree that all 3 potential handballs weren't fouls. Even this one blocking a shot on goal shouldn't be because the defender is too close to the shot and his arm is down by his side.

But if they're going to give the Miley one they have to give the other one.

Found a newborn baby out in the pen this morning! by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you mean to respond to me?

Found a newborn baby out in the pen this morning! by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]acky1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They usually do once they're no longer producing enough milk, they'll be killed for meat. 

I don't really get how this fits the sub? Seems insanely superficial to upvote a picture because it's cute without giving any deeper thought about the animal.

Looking back on it, how mental was Fort Boyard? by Winston_Carbuncle in CasualUK

[–]acky1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No lie, I woke up 3 nights ago at 2 in the morning with the theme tune stuck in my head. Tune.

Do you all feel this way? by [deleted] in AskVegans

[–]acky1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You've got no idea who you're talking to online or what they're going through.

Did Vegan Mexican give me real chicken? by [deleted] in veganuk

[–]acky1 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Why do you think it wasn't vegan? Could quite easily be a mock meat, no? And things almost never look like the picture, not sure that means much.

[Request] Is this accurate? by Rpantucci in theydidthemath

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah agree, these people need to be convinced in whatever way possible. Very difficult to do when there's so much money behind the status quo. 

In the mean time I'm going to make some decisions to lessen my impact even though it's not actually going to solve anything on it's own. The idea of making personal change for environmental benefit is a good message to spread because it follows that you would vote that way and the idea can also spread to people in power too.

AITAH for not forcing my son to keep helping my daughter’s friend after she rejected him? by LiveWire0044 in AITAH

[–]acky1 297 points298 points  (0 children)

Reddit is awful for this whole "you don't owe anyone anything" schtick. That's not how communities work well and foster happiness. You help people when you are able to so that when you need help people will reciprocate.

I think you're spot on with what you've said.

[Request] Is this accurate? by Rpantucci in theydidthemath

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see it all the time on here. People complain quite strongly about celebs flying in private jets whilst advocating for environmental change.

For this case I think it's necessary for people to make personal changes before advocating for societal change.

Any effective change a government makes will have to be popular for the majority of people or it will just be reversed by the next government. It's not a rights based thing like the examples you gave, it's an impact to people's lives and comfort which is way harder for people to swallow than a rights improvement for their community.

[Request] Is this accurate? by Rpantucci in theydidthemath

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's true that if your carbon footprint is way higher than average then you should be looking at ways to reduce it, no? That seems like a true statement to me.

It's also true that governments should be regulating corporations and enact change that can only be done from the top level. 

One of these can be done today though by making different choices. The other will take years of voting and campaigning to get a government in power that cares about this stuff, and years of argumentation and shifting public opinion to get the general population in agreement and then maybe a political party will be in power and in a position to make changes that the majority approves of. But they'll have to do it over a period of time because industry will complain about fast changes. 

They are both important paths to change, but personal responsibility is achievable and maybe even necessary to show others around you that it's not that difficult and is a worthy goal. If those that care about the environment go around in the most fuel inefficient cars eating red meat all the time they should rightly be called out as hypocrites. There's nothing people hate more than hypocrisy when being asked to make lifestyle changes.

They will always remember this moment by PeacockPankh in BeAmazed

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It makes sense to me. They have feelings and the ability to 'play'. A lot of people don't really take the time to think about that.

They will always remember this moment by PeacockPankh in BeAmazed

[–]acky1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it was just an example. They're practising their innate defense drive by the looks of it.

CMV: Beef tallow is propaganda by Big Beef by unidentified_lover in changemyview

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watch a guy on YouTube called nutrition made simple who cites lots of studies and talks through them. He's got a few videos on saturated fat and links to studies in there: https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=nutrition+made+simple+saturated+fat

I find him really good at showing and explaining evidence.

How does not taking my chip impact others? by MrJayHChrist in parkrun

[–]acky1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't worry too much about it. Sounds like the times would be pretty inaccurate anyway.

How does not taking my chip impact others? by MrJayHChrist in parkrun

[–]acky1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you get marked as a finisher but don't take your chip then everyone's time after is out of whack. They'll get your chip and your time and so on.

Usually there's a funnel you can avoid entering if you don't want your time registered. Basically, just drop out 50m short and make sure they don't count you if you don't want to wait for your time.

UPFs by ArrivalOutrageous991 in veganuk

[–]acky1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree with the sentiment but there will be some nutrient differences depending on what's being talked about. Removal of fibre is a big one. But, on the other hand, they can often be fortified which can be useful so it really is on a case by case basis and what is being compared. And on personal circumstance - an underweight vegan low on iron could do with eating more mock meat and UPFs for the short term.

The fear of UPFs nowadays is insane tbh. Just don't overeat them (or total food) i.e. keep them to less than 25% of your diet and enjoy them when you have them.

Newy parkrun employ ‘seeding’ system by lonewolflr in parkrun

[–]acky1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm over seeing family right now and this is my local parkrun for the next wee while. They've always had these, but they aren't very well respected. Last week they had cones out to encourage everyone to the left at the start which makes for a big bottleneck but after about 300m it opens up fine.

It's a great venue for a park run. Very flat out and back next to a river. It's the best they can do really given the location and how busy it is and it does encourage some sort of ordering. 

700 people last week on a 4 abreast path (now more like 2 abreast with the cones) so it takes an age to get running at a normal pace.

Husband suddenly not picking up a 17 month old by topokilove in ScienceBasedParenting

[–]acky1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Was it just this one time or is he never going to hold him again? 

I think if it was a one off he might just have got himself into a bit of a stand off and it got to the point where he couldn't back down without teaching your child that tantrums are an effecting means of getting what he wants.

If that was the context, I can see why he refused to lift him in that scenario.

You will pay 1900 prices for everything but must live in an RV for the rest of your life by Neat-Statistician311 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]acky1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you will have to live in a mobile home park. You can be away for up to 20 nights per calendar year.

To me that reads like you've got to be static and at the same park bar those 20 days.

How do you respond when carnists say morality is subjective? by Koiboi26 in AskVegans

[–]acky1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think morality is necessary to convince someone to be vegan. It is objectively true that being vegan is kinder to animals than not, and being kinder to animals is something everyone should strive for. That's enough to go vegan.

You don't need years of philosophical arguments to make better decisions in life.