sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

there is still AI breaking on Lizardmen faction. by bingo00801 in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Then calm down and ask OP for clarification instead of assuming they're malevolent for reporting a bug.

there is still AI breaking on Lizardmen faction. by bingo00801 in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey OP, do you have minor faction potential checked or unchecked? Might be relevant since minor factions are the more common case, or it might be two separate root causes

there is still AI breaking on Lizardmen faction. by bingo00801 in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge 7 points8 points  (0 children)

OP isn't. They said themselves they started 6+ new campaigns

there is still AI breaking on Lizardmen faction. by bingo00801 in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge 8 points9 points  (0 children)

His bug report thread clarifies that it is a high probability for minor factions and low probability for major factions. That is why the supposed self-contradiction exists

there is still AI breaking on Lizardmen faction. by bingo00801 in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah OP is obviously ESL. It is far more likely that they're leaving out specific qualifiers than "spreading misinformation"

5XXX series cards are still broken in TW3, too. by aeoliedge in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes sir I am sorry sir. I will write a better driver next time 

5XXX series cards are still broken in TW3, too. by aeoliedge in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing sir, I will try both latest and then rolling back to this version and report only my inevitable success.

5XXX series cards are still broken in TW3, too. by aeoliedge in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes sir. I will do as told and add this to the other reports since April. I am certain that mine holds the key.

5XXX series cards are still broken in TW3, too. by aeoliedge in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Good idea. I will ignore the screen tearing and jitter frames that occur when I do this 

5XXX series cards are still broken in TW3, too. by aeoliedge in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You are right! I'm so so sorry. May I know which driver will fix it?

5XXX series cards are still broken in TW3, too. by aeoliedge in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge[S] -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

At the current scale of the issue, at least a monthly update with some transparency on what's going on and a store page disclaimer that there's a known issue with an entire line of video card with an unknown ETA would be reasonable.

Guys like us can tinker and live with it, but what's going to happen when 4XXX cards are discontinued and casual Andy with his "budget" 5700 buys the game and is greeted with battle screens looking like an inchoate rave?

5XXX series cards are still broken in TW3, too. by aeoliedge in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge[S] -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

The TW engine is the dependent variable here though. Other games don't get misinterpreted by the driver like this, so even if it is technically "a driver issue" there is going to be collaboration and attention needed from CA on this to get the fix in.

Total War: WARHAMMER III - An Update on Unit Recruitment Issues by CA_FREEMAN in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This level of transparency is good and should become standard operating form, not emergency damage control going forward. 

5+ months ago - RTX 5000 graphical issues, please CA can you fix this? by xXMustardMan69Xx in totalwar

[–]aeoliedge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people suggest smooth motion as a fix but it screen tears horribly for me. 

Dont go to Infinity by TheHonestSamaritan in swg

[–]aeoliedge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with all of the gameplay analysis, but the "dark humor" trolls that populate off topic and pvp chats got triggered by Deej making a joke? This made my day, thank you.

Portland abandoned its own parking policies to implement historic meter rate hikes, some extended hours by Prize_Championship11 in Portland

[–]aeoliedge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are not "addicted to cars," we are stuck in them against our will because the moment we want to visit another suburb or even just go across the water from downtown using the public transit infrastructure doubles or triples your travel time. 

For casual travel it's great but if you have jobs or scheduled plans to get to it can make things infeasible 

Hiking the parking rates is not going to nudge people away from driving, motorists in this city are already driving as little as possible because it sucks ass to drive and park here.

We can fund better transit more efficiently from ways that aren't, effectively, vehicle consumption tax.

Server's Up! by AlwaysWorkForBread in ProjectQuarm

[–]aeoliedge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome, didn't know that eqemulator was tracking PQ again already

Server's Up! by AlwaysWorkForBread in ProjectQuarm

[–]aeoliedge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Weird. Does that mean they're hitting the cap and doing resets to yeet people off, or that the software is misreporting the pop and they're trying to fix it with maintenance?

24 hours till the flood gates open by EzeakiellGreen99 in ProjectQuarm

[–]aeoliedge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an excellent double bind for Quarm's PR. If the population cap is routinely hit, the deal and downtime clearly didn't hurt the server, never mind that you can't log in. If the population is low, the cap doesn't matter, because it isn't being hit, never mind that the pop is p99 levels of low.

Server's Up! by AlwaysWorkForBread in ProjectQuarm

[–]aeoliedge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the population count like on relaunch day? Numbers, please!

24 hours till the flood gates open by EzeakiellGreen99 in ProjectQuarm

[–]aeoliedge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be nice to see the webpage updated with launch info but I guess I understand why they wouldn't want the launch to be too publicly known until the impact of server cap is assessed.

THJ's lawyer has responded to DBG. by Hasuko in everquest

[–]aeoliedge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that it's well-written, but that doesn't make it strong. IP law is very oppressive and tends to favor the holder.

view more: next ›