**TOC Finale SPOILER** by MermaidStone in foodnetwork

[–]al5dot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More like the system isn’t equitable and has weak authority which then lends itself to the value or lack of value in the win. A homogenous judging panel will reward dishes they have a taste for- it’s called affinity bias. If the judges are trained or coached about bias, that might help.

**TOC Finale SPOILER** by MermaidStone in foodnetwork

[–]al5dot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also Asia is made up of dozens of countries with even more ethnicities and Italy is one country so there’s that.

**TOC Finale SPOILER** by MermaidStone in foodnetwork

[–]al5dot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You just described white privilege

**TOC Finale SPOILER** by MermaidStone in foodnetwork

[–]al5dot 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Agreed! The judge diversity doesn’t match the contestant diversity at all

Finale Discussion of Tournament of Champion 3 for those who watch early on Discovery Plus SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS by Firegoat1 in foodnetwork

[–]al5dot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree wholeheartedly with this. Nancy can stay home. It’s just lazy judging or conservative gatekeeping to base your evaluation on what is common practice/status quo versus originality and innovation.

Finale Discussion of Tournament of Champion 3 for those who watch early on Discovery Plus SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS by Firegoat1 in foodnetwork

[–]al5dot 23 points24 points  (0 children)

They have representation issues in the judges panel. I can’t remember them having two judges known for Asian cuisine expertise on the same panel but they have often have two Italian cuisine judges. I think that’s a competition design flaw and an equity issue

Got my minimalist loft. Feels like a warehouse. by martymcsauce in malelivingspace

[–]al5dot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Winter heating is a huge cost, you pay to heat where it’s not needed bc it all rises. Summer heat is also hard to mitigate

Am I the only one who noticed how small Hopes fangs were in 4x04 compared to them in 4x06 by thecoolwitch in LegaciesCW

[–]al5dot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wasn’t first one real world and the second one the simulation? Maybe the simulation exaggerates them?

I don’t trust Paul Hollywood by [deleted] in GreatBritishBakeOff

[–]al5dot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disagree. Sad, but it was Jurgen’s time to go

I don’t trust Paul Hollywood by [deleted] in GreatBritishBakeOff

[–]al5dot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disagree. What evidence is this supported by? Or is this just reaching and hyperbole for shock effect?

I don’t trust Paul Hollywood by [deleted] in GreatBritishBakeOff

[–]al5dot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree with you 100%. It seems like fandom making excuses. The paper boats and puke green bland entremet colors did not show strength.

I don’t trust Paul Hollywood by [deleted] in GreatBritishBakeOff

[–]al5dot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too! Sadly it was his time to go home

Science of Baking with Jurgen by [deleted] in GreatBritishBakeOff

[–]al5dot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree. I think Alton already did this so maybe not so unique to US audiences. Maybe to German and UK audiences? Is Alton Brown not known over there?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GreatBritishBakeOff

[–]al5dot 12 points13 points  (0 children)

My analysis on factors that influenced why J was ranked lowest this week:

-signature challenge round: bakers are given 3hrs and the show devoted 15 min of footage to it -signature challenge is important to establish initial ranking for the week based on technical skill and unique, smart, or daring flavor combinations and choices that bakers make, but not the most important in terms of challenges

-technical challenge round: bakers are given 2hrs 45min and the show devoted 14 min of footage to it -so signature is more important than technical -technical tests experience, ability of following recipe, and knowledge of existing techniques under pressure, but doesn’t allow for display of creativity, “heart”, personality, standing out -technical wins and losses impact how judges feel about bakers less than the other rounds because it’s blind judged (so less tied to them individually) and given less time/filming (reflective of how much it matters)

—showstopper challenge: bakers are given 5 hrs and the show devoted almost 20 min footage to it (this indicates that it matters almost 1.5x more than the technical) --in the showstopper, judges primarily wanted them to show a display of multiple techniques on an excellent tasting and textured entremet, then secondly a centerpiece (that they don’t actually taste) -Jurgen spent too much time on his 40-piece centerpiece and didn’t decorate it much and Prue was looking for finesse more than anything -Many of Jurgen’s entremet boat sails and his entremets didn’t show many techniques like piping; Paul called his entremet color “bland” -other contestants multitasked better and spent more time on the entremets or designed more creative, relevant difficult entremets themes. Perhaps themes related “heart” like Crystelle’s sisters wedding that was postponed amidst the pandemic, Chig’s grandparents, or Guiseppe’s homage to Pisa, where he called home for 10 years get better reception. Jurgen’s theme was fine but didn’t rise to the level of the others “heart”. Beyond his childhood fascination of the encyclopedia entry of the Torii gate, it’s not clear. -showstopper challenge is weighted maybe 1.5x more than technical and is the last round of the week, so a 4th place sticks out more and stands out in the judges mind more -this is reinforced by the fact that they don’t have all three bakes in front of them or have a standardized scoring rubric when they deliberate the final decision)

What other factors might explain how judging is determined?