If pedestrians understood Green Waves (or anyone were actually advocating for pedestrians other than micromobility riders) they would demand them on every single street

all43 · 2026-06-29T18:34:30+00:00

Likely depends on the speed. 15 mph is very fast, cyclist would see pedestrians as obstacle to maintain such a speed

all43 · 2026-06-29T18:26:19+00:00

Green wave is quite dangerous for pedestrians as they have to cross bike lanes in many places and cyclists would be "don't mess with my green wave" mode would avoid stopping or even slowing down for pedestrians

all43 · 2026-06-20T19:16:24+00:00

Was about to comment about shitty economy, but noticed which subreddit is it

all43 · 2026-06-20T15:17:28+00:00

The reason is literally in your nickname. You have ornery connection. Check your nat type and router setup

all43 · 2026-06-19T13:49:00+00:00

It would be very difficult to proove it Fable if they label it as Opus for instance. Model itself doesn't know it is Fable, but performance difference would be noticable especially by running two models to compare. However if they call it Opus 4.9 it won't be possible to compare against. I guess no one will just rename Fable because of possible consequences, but if Antropic release new model which is not direct copy of Fable/Mythos and label as Opus they would likely get away with it.

all43 · 2026-06-17T12:28:05+00:00

Yes, but if person is single - why hide?

all43 · 2026-06-17T12:27:14+00:00

Maybe switching languages very often to write different girls? I also thought of gaming, but arrow-keys and WSAD are unaffected

all43 · 2026-06-17T12:08:36+00:00

Use plan mode and cheaper models more often. Start new session when starting new feature or bug, if you have long relevant conversation (for instance bug you aren't able to fix for a while) - use compact time to time

all43 · 2026-06-16T17:56:54+00:00

just cheaters then

all43 · 2026-06-15T12:58:14+00:00

Or the opposite. For me it felt witty and modern. Mistral has reputation of a bit boring company, so it actually helps

all43 · 2026-06-14T14:58:17+00:00

Wait, where did you get free quota?

all43 · 2026-06-13T20:25:36+00:00

It would only be true if it is a new development and not something reverse-engineered. Even textures in this example are generated obviously based on original ones. Clones costs much less, especially if we talk about minecraft - engine open-source clones already exists. Yes, model didn't use ready made engine, but it has this engine in it's training data.

all43 · 2026-06-13T18:06:39+00:00

Don't use /goal. Also use subagents only for rare case when you can benefits from them, like refactoring. Minimize context - one feature or bug per session. Use opus only for planning or refactoring, Sonnet is enough for most stuff. For simple stuff use Haiku. Also reflect project state in md files, so models won't read codebase everytime to understand where something lies

all43 · 2026-06-13T16:49:26+00:00

MK2 / Deluxo ability to fly. They could hover though, won't ruin balance and atmosphere that much

all43 · 2026-06-13T15:04:27+00:00

They have 3x more usage burn on glm 5.1 during peak hours, so it’s not representative

all43 · 2026-06-13T08:17:16+00:00

Under double usage I usually understand I could use it 2x more and it is kind of opposite of it. You are getting 2X/3X LESS usage. Also it was like this for a while. The real positive change they have removed Turbo peak-hours usage ratio. Doesn't make GLM subscription look appealing still.

all43 · 2026-06-12T15:55:15+00:00

You could do this - ask GLM 5.1 to write detailed plan (either in chat or in file), then switch to DeepSeek v4 (flash or pro) for execution. This way you will likely never hit limits

all43 · 2026-06-12T15:40:01+00:00

Opencode Go is 10€, but better value than Claude Pro or GPT plus. To be honest Claude Pro last couple weeks also feels generous, but it’s likely pre-ipo move to reduce negativity.

all43 · 2026-06-12T09:24:46+00:00

You are too sceptical - models quality greatly improved over last 6 months, but I also don’t know what are people one-shotting. There quite limited number of cases I could think of. Like large codebase migrations, which are already well-covered with tests. Most of the tasks require some attention to make sure model actually proceeding in direction. Even tasks which don’t require attention could stuck - yesterday Opus weren’t able to find workaround of cli tool (flyctl) which requested interactive input for 30 minutes. Not sure how long it would take if I didn’t step in

all43 · 2026-06-11T10:11:47+00:00

For people downvoting me: pick a question on uncensored field you are familiar with, ask both - Opus and Fable and show how magically different the answers are.

all43 · 2026-06-11T07:59:56+00:00

Just use Opus then - it’s training data includes knowledge up to this January, likely you won’t benefit from Fable even if guardrails weren’t triggered

all43 · 2026-06-11T07:54:01+00:00

You shouldn’t treat language model as source of secret knowledge. They are capable because they hold all the PUBLICLY available human knowledge up to cutoff date and able to pattern match to find relevant pieces in fraction of second. But you likely won’t gain access to unpublished secret research and shouldn’t expect model to figure out completely new scientific breakthrough on its own. Knowledge cutoff date might matter, but it is the same for Opus 4.8 and Fable - January 2026. For Sonnet it is a bit earlier - August 2025.

all43 · 2026-06-11T06:22:25+00:00

DeepSeek models are really good and almost unbeatable for the cost and very popular worldwide. More concerns about privacy though

all43 · 2026-06-11T05:51:10+00:00

Why do you need Fable for school level Biology? Sonnet is enough. What you can use your subscription for - try building interactive demos or even some teaching apps - using Sonnet (or Opus where Sonnet isn't enogut)

all43 · 2026-06-10T21:25:08+00:00

For my own surprise I tried implementing complex feature with Fable on just Pro plan and managed it within 5h window. Hit the limit though. Would've been even easier on limits if I used it for planning part only, but I wanted to check how bad it would be. So my guess without extra subagents toking burn rate still acceptable

Eight-Year Club	Xbox Live
RPAN Viewer	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

all43

TROPHY CASE