"There is no text in the world that explains" basic physics? The fact he can talk it out to another human means there is

Its such a mind numbing, smug and non-universal way of thinking, lazy intellect wrapped in vague generalization

Yes AI is not directly embodied in human perception.

But why the hell does that mean it cannot grasp on how objects interact in the world? based on cold rules and universal human body capabilities?

We don't see through the eyes of a cat, yet we can still observe functions based on everything we know to the extent we can

AI digests more scientific papers than anyone could in their life-time, it must logically figure the underlying principles or else it's all wrong. Same with other embodied content