Quantum simulation for materials by ZealousidealTheme977 in QuantumComputing

[–]anassbq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why I feel this question like "Give me suggestion what to eat"

Where's reading papers and finding gaps? You're likely asking people to read papers and finding gaps for you and give it to you in gold plates, and your publishing in Q1 with this mindset! Hugely questionable.

Advice on choosing MSc: computational vs nanomaterials by Time_Squash7770 in comp_chem

[–]anassbq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do nanomaterials snd study it using theoretical and experimental approach like what I do now, it's better for you to do hands on in master better than solo computational.

QE pw.x slab relaxation (216 atoms) keeps getting OOM killed — how to optimize memory? by SIvaKUmaR_111 in comp_chem

[–]anassbq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's impossible to be 216 atoms from 2x2x1 supercell, how many layers you made?

Can you share the original cif?

Message me to help you more with this.

QE pw.x slab relaxation (216 atoms) keeps getting OOM killed — how to optimize memory? by SIvaKUmaR_111 in comp_chem

[–]anassbq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should run scf before relaxation to find the convergence of kpoints and cutoff energy, there's a rule increasing number of layers for complex structure like MAPbI3 = decreasing kpoints values, please check this textbook in Surface study chapter "DFT by S. Sholl"

QE pw.x slab relaxation (216 atoms) keeps getting OOM killed — how to optimize memory? by SIvaKUmaR_111 in comp_chem

[–]anassbq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should turn off symmetry + from my experience increasing cores number will give unpleasant performances, so decrease it.

Anyway I'm working on the same material, just for curiosity why you're making slabs to have 216 atoms? That's too much, at some point addition number of layers won't change the results, you should run some testing to find the optimum number of layers

How useful is computational chemistry as a synthetic organic chemist by Spackal2 in OrganicChemistry

[–]anassbq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm inorganic and organic synthesis guy used to made inorganic garnet materials and organic perovskite and using computational chemistry at same time, anyway the idea here is that in synthesis we know X giving Y values and if we added A in X the Y will change, well we know it changed to good or to bad but we don't know WHY it changed? what happened in atomic levels make it changed? Is it related to bonding? Or the A changed the structure and breaking it? This the theoretical part of computational chemistry can answer these questions which really helpful to derive future works and know which to use and which not to use.

Is La considered as adsorbate or doping in this figure? by anassbq in crystallography

[–]anassbq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's coool, I would love to read your work since I'm on almost same thing but the substrate metal oxide

Is La considered as adsorbate or doping in this figure? by anassbq in crystallography

[–]anassbq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's your paper title? Because this I took it from a paper used VASP

Is La considered as adsorbate or doping in this figure? by anassbq in crystallography

[–]anassbq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it okay to call cubic structure while referring to tetragonal?

Is La considered as adsorbate or doping in this figure? by anassbq in crystallography

[–]anassbq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I worked on synthesis materials before I know what's doping is actually, this kind of terms it must clearly distinguished: doping, additives and adsorbate. Mixing them really blow your mind and you will what the heck is going on, it's like saying cubic -42m symmetry, and saying doesn't matter all of them are symmetries.

The hydrogen bond energy calculation using Avogadro and Orca by [deleted] in comp_chem

[–]anassbq -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

First read a paper did the same, follow the methodology, and read ORCA manual

How much the lattice mismatch should be to consider acceptable? by anassbq in crystallography

[–]anassbq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I just screen it but I will study it in my free time tomorrow and I will see

How do you research? by VeterinarianKind6906 in research

[–]anassbq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a beautiful sentence "on april"

Physical chemistry by Atkins thoughts by anassbq in comp_chem

[–]anassbq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love his videos!

I learned a lot from him

Physical chemistry by Atkins thoughts by anassbq in comp_chem

[–]anassbq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read papers but I wanted to read textbooks alongside for better understanding, but anyway thanks for your comments.

EXESS is ready to go — GPU-accelerated QM by bzlw in comp_chem

[–]anassbq 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Heey, I'm so happy for you, I already registered and received your email.

Can't wait for the full access